Philip Venables: "4:48 Psychosis"; H&N, Sat 30/6/18, 1010:00pm

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
    Gone fishin'
    • Sep 2011
    • 30163

    Philip Venables: "4:48 Psychosis"; H&N, Sat 30/6/18, 1010:00pm

    Sarah Kane (1971-99) was to British Drama in the late 20th Century what Christopher Marlowe had been four hundred years previously - except that her work was rarely performed here during her lifetime; instead, it received an enthusiastic reputation in many countries abroad where critics and audiences were far more appreciative of its intense presentation of people at the extremes of emotional violence - visceral, in that it twists the guts both of the characters onstage and of the audience who witness. So unlike the home life of our own, dear Queen.

    How - and why - this could be translated into the medium of Music Theatre is something I can't imagine, which is why this broadcast of Philip Venables(b1979)'s adaptation of Kane's final (and shortest) work so intrigues me. Can the composer's style - sort-of Birtwistle's Punch & Judy meets post-Andrieesen - really add anything to what is already there in Kane's text, or will it simply dilute it for the delicate sensitivities of British Good Taste? The critics were very enthusiastic about the new opera - which suggests the latter, of course - but that shouldn't necessarily put us off. The composer introduces his work, and with particular mention of the new opera, in this youTube video:

    a short video introducing the work of composer Philip Venables. www.philipvenables.com


    ... which suggests something much more interesting than any of the "new" Music Theatre works presented on Hear & Now over the past several months.

    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
  • Richard Barrett
    Guest
    • Jan 2016
    • 6259

    #2
    "Interestingly" I was approached some years ago by a theatre company in Australia to compose music for a production of 4:48 Psychosis (which is the correct way round for the title) which of course I immediately agreed to... although the project didn't get much further than that, as a result of some kind of rights problem I wasn't party to. Before that happened I spent some time establishing the kind of music this would be, which I can still hear quite clearly now, so I don't imagine I'm going to end up with much sympathy towards this actual production. I have the impression that Venables' music in general is rather less radical in its tone of voice than it would need to be in this context. I remember thinking when I first saw the text that indeed spoken voices alone are not enough (given that there's basically no stage action either) and that some kind of non-verbal sonic framework (not really a "musical setting", still less an "opera") is implied by the way the text is structured.

    Comment

    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
      Gone fishin'
      • Sep 2011
      • 30163

      #3
      That "missed opportunity" is going to be stuck in my mind as I listen tomorrow night, Richard. Apparently Sarah Kan's estate have been very forbidding about granting rights to adapt her work, (including for theatrical performance it seems!) and Venables was the first person to be allowed to work with it in this way.

      Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
      4:48 Psychosis (which is the correct way round for the title)
      Yes - the "4:48" referring to the time each morning that Kane would wake during her depression. Venables maintains the order in his own work (which I should have noticed) - I don't know why the BBC website decided to invert it. Duly edited, now.
      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

      Comment

      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
        Gone fishin'
        • Sep 2011
        • 30163

        #4
        Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
        I have the impression that Venables' music in general is rather less radical in its tone of voice than it would need to be in this context.
        An "impression" that proved sadly to be all-too-accurate a prediction. I was terribly disappointed with this work - the best bits (like those for a bad film) presented in the "trailer" I posted earlier. So - that's how to impress British critics with Kane's work: dilute it!
        Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 05-07-18, 18:49.
        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

        Comment

        • Serial_Apologist
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 37691

          #5
          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
          An "impression" that proved sadly to be all to accurate a prediction. I was terribly disappointed with this work - the best bits (like those for a bad film) presented in the "trailer" I posted earlier. So - that's how to impress British critics with Kane's work: dilute it!
          Indeed: "When is something interesting, or something at all, going to happen", I kept asking myself as I struggled to stay awake.

          Comment

          Working...
          X