Originally posted by Richard Barrett
View Post
The wrong note school is back at last!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sydney Grew View PostOut of interest, what makes certain sorts of modern compositions "experimental" and other sorts of modern compositions not?
"if you're going to be experimental with the tuning"
Why does this need any elaborative explanation?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sydney Grew View PostOut of interest, what makes certain sorts of modern compositions "experimental" and other sorts of modern compositions not?
In some ways ALL music is an "experiment"
I would maybe make the distinction between music where the performance is an experiment and music where the experiments happen before (as in Mahler and Stockhausen)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostThe word "experimental" can be a bit over/mis-used IMV
In some ways ALL music is an "experiment"
I would maybe make the distinction between music where the performance is an experiment and music where the experiments happen before (as in Mahler and Stockhausen)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sydney Grew View PostOut of interest, what makes certain sorts of modern compositions "experimental" and other sorts of modern compositions not?
1.(of a new invention or product) based on untested ideas or techniques and not yet established or finalized.
2.(of art or an artistic technique) involving a radically new and innovative style.
So it appears to be a word which has been hijacked by the artistic community (John Cage?) to mean something slightly different. Can't help feeling that the word was originally used in an apologetic sense.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Oddball View PostA good question. Obviously this work is not an experiment in the scientific sense. But reference to the dictionary gives:
1.(of a new invention or product) based on untested ideas or techniques and not yet established or finalized.
2.(of art or an artistic technique) involving a radically new and innovative style.
So it appears to be a word which has been hijacked by the artistic community (John Cage?) to mean something slightly different. Can't help feeling that the word was originally used in an apologetic sense.
Comment
-
-
Richard Barrett
Sydney Grew's question is in any case based on a misreading of my post - I did not refer to the composition as experimental but to the composer's approach ("if you're going to be experimental").
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post. . . if you're going to be experimental with the tuning why be so conventional with everything else? why not go the extra distance like Harry Partch and build instruments which are conceived from the start in terms of the system you're using...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostYes - one of his best works, I think...
I don't possess that book and am trying to recall Nyman's definition of the difference between avant-garde and experimental music. If I remember correctly the latter had to do with music whose outcome is only decided in performance, not by working at a score until perfected in accordance with a composer's assumed intentions. But, a composer's intentions may be to be non-intentional regarding outcomes, or be intentional that his performers, possibly not including himself, are non-intentional. But in that case either s/he, or they, would have to be intentional about being non-intentional.
The only conclusion I can reach is that to be experimental one is expected to be non-intentional at the moment one originally intended to be.
Comment
-
Comment