The Choir 26.01.14

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jean
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7100

    #61
    Originally posted by W.Kearns View Post
    If this view is elitist, so be it.
    No, that's an ingeniously non-elitist way of putting it.

    I was thinking more of the poor souls and their predicament and talk of foisting.

    Comment

    • EnemyoftheStoat
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 1142

      #62
      Originally posted by jean View Post
      It's a while since I've lived in London and it did just occur to me to google the Philharmonia myself, and I discovered what you've just posted.

      Creeping professionalisation of an area we used to have all to ourselves, I call it!
      Letting the side down, I call it; I wouldn't want to sing with an outfit that has to be stiffened by pros.

      Comment

      • Eine Alpensinfonie
        Host
        • Nov 2010
        • 20578

        #63
        Instrumentalists get paid in professional concerts, but in general, the choirs singing with them do not. Solo instrumentalists and singers get paid for their work. It isn't exactly natural justice. Last year, I was invited to sing in the chorus for Rutter's Requiem, for I which I would have to pay a fee. Then on realisation that I was an oboist, I was asked to play th obligato in The Lord is My Shepherd in the Requiem, for which I was paid a 3 figure sum for 5 minutes' work. It felt wrong. I only accepted it because the cellist was being paid too.

        Comment

        • Gabriel Jackson
          Full Member
          • May 2011
          • 686

          #64
          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          I'm not sure that The Choir has ever lived up to the specialist credentials of Choirworks. I assumed that was why it replaced a programme that really was for people interested in choral music - too elitist.
          When I was a guest presenter of The Choir last year, talking about Baltic choirs and composers, there wasn't a whiff of an idea that we should be too elitist. Quite the opposite - the one thing the producer did not want was music or choral groups that are well-known (so no Arvo Part, No Peteris Vasks, no Latvian Radio Choir or Estonian Philharmonic Chamber Choir...) and I was very happy to have the opportunity to introduce listeners to a whole load of stuff they were very unlikely to have encountered before.

          Comment

          • Nick Armstrong
            Host
            • Nov 2010
            • 26601

            #65
            Is there a 'not' missing before 'too elitist', GJ?
            "...the isle is full of noises,
            Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
            Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
            Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

            Comment

            • ardcarp
              Late member
              • Nov 2010
              • 11102

              #66
              That depends how you read it, Calibs. Do you want a ne...pas?

              Anyway, come back guest presenters! All is forgiven.

              Comment

              • Nick Armstrong
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 26601

                #67
                Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
                That depends how you read it, Calibs.
                I read it that an extra 'not' was necessary in the first sentence to tie in with the second - nobody said 'don't be too elitist'... on the contrary, Gabirel was encouraged to avoid the familiar in favour of introducing listeners to new material
                "...the isle is full of noises,
                Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                Comment

                • DracoM
                  Host
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 13005

                  #68
                  Well, GJ, how many tweets, emails, 'choral epiphanies', choral classics were you enjoined to introduce?
                  Ans = NONE.
                  In which case just measure what The Choir might be [ and was in your prog] and what it now is, and you might begin to understand that there seems to have been a MIGHTY sea-change in the whole production style and content.

                  And in understanding that, perhaps the grounds upon which some of us are in a state of near despair as to what is happening to it 'under new management'?

                  Comment

                  • Gabriel Jackson
                    Full Member
                    • May 2011
                    • 686

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Caliban View Post
                    Is there a 'not' missing before 'too elitist', GJ?
                    Indeed there should!

                    Comment

                    • Gabriel Jackson
                      Full Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 686

                      #70
                      Originally posted by DracoM View Post
                      Well, GJ, how many tweets, emails, 'choral epiphanies', choral classics were you enjoined to introduce?
                      Ans = NONE.
                      In which case just measure what The Choir might be [ and was in your prog] and what it now is, and you might begin to understand that there seems to have been a MIGHTY sea-change in the whole production style and content.

                      And in understanding that, perhaps the grounds upon which some of us are in a state of near despair as to what is happening to it 'under new management'?
                      If you actually read what I wrote, you will note that it was to counter a specific suggestion (made by you also) that The Choir, from the off, was intended to be a less "elitist" programme than Choirworks.

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30647

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Gabriel Jackson View Post
                        When I was a guest presenter of The Choir last year, talking about Baltic choirs and composers, there wasn't a whiff of an idea that we should be too elitist. Quite the opposite - the one thing the producer did not want was music or choral groups that are well-known (so no Arvo Part, No Peteris Vasks, no Latvian Radio Choir or Estonian Philharmonic Chamber Choir...) and I was very happy to have the opportunity to introduce listeners to a whole load of stuff they were very unlikely to have encountered before.
                        That may be. But the BBC 'reason' for discontinuing Choirworks was that having 90 mins devoted to choral music on a Sunday evening was a bit inflexible for the scheduling. So the idea was to have a 'Performance on 3' instead, which might feature choral music, but didn't need to. So far, so good.

                        Two years later, the BBC signed Aled Jones from Classic FM, for various presenting jobs on radio and television and, lo! 90 mins of choral music reappears on Radio 3 on a Sunday evening, with our new presenter in place of the old one. You may read into that what you wish, but I'm cynical: Aled Jones had a big personal following on Classic FM... I listened to the first two programmes and never listened again. Unlike you, apparently, I wasn't impressed. That doesn't preclude individual programmes being very good, certainly more recently (I believe that was stated here). I don't presume to pass judgement on what I haven't heard.
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • ardcarp
                          Late member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 11102

                          #72
                          I'm not sure what 'elite' means really. To acknowledge it is to suggest that only stuck-up nobs sing in choirs. Many fine choirs (one could cite the male-voice choirs of mining communities) could be called 'elite' in terms of their performing standard. I was privileged to accompany the Morriston Orpheus on tour many years ago, and one could not help be struck not only by their standards but also by their musicianship and deep love of and commitment to the music they sang.

                          I think The Choir succeeds best when it chooses a theme (eg Male Voice Choirs, Baltic Choirs, Barber Shop, Youth Choirs) and explores it in some depth, preferably guided by someone with practical experience and thorough knowledge.

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20578

                            #73
                            What I want to know is - what is wrong with elitism? It isn't the same as exclusivity.

                            Is Sky Sports going to adopt the same exclusivity and replace Premiership football with Scholes Park Raiders playing similar clubs?

                            (SPR is the club Jonathan Greening played for before moving (via York City) to the elitist Manchester United, and later to the elitist Middlesborough, the elitist West Bromwich Albion and the elitist Fulham, and is now playing for the trying-very-hard-to-be-elitist Nottingham Forest.)

                            Striving for the best is a good thing.
                            Last edited by Eine Alpensinfonie; 11-02-14, 21:49.

                            Comment

                            • DracoM
                              Host
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 13005

                              #74
                              Originally posted by Gabriel Jackson View Post
                              If you actually read what I wrote, you will note that it was to counter a specific suggestion (made by you also) that The Choir, from the off, was intended to be a less "elitist" programme than Choirworks.
                              No: maybe I made the same mistake as thousands of others in expecting The Choir to be a more or less seamless continuation of the 'Choirworks' slot. How wrong I was.

                              Comment

                              • DracoM
                                Host
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 13005

                                #75
                                Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
                                I'm not sure what 'elite' means really. To acknowledge it is to suggest that only stuck-up nobs sing in choirs. Many fine choirs (one could cite the male-voice choirs of mining communities) could be called 'elite' in terms of their performing standard. I was privileged to accompany the Morriston Orpheus on tour many years ago, and one could not help be struck not only by their standards but also by their musicianship and deep love of and commitment to the music they sang.

                                I think The Choir succeeds best when it chooses a theme (eg Male Voice Choirs, Baltic Choirs, Barber Shop, Youth Choirs) and explores it in some depth, preferably guided by someone with practical experience and thorough knowledge.

                                Precisely said, ardcarp, and FF, and it is that very loss of proper thematic focus and the loss of being led by an expert in the field that excites and educates that I most lament.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X