Or margerine?
Has science really discovered what causes the 'tingle' factor?
Collapse
X
-
Simon
Comment
-
Simon
...did Britten write Flora’s part with a girl’s voice in mind?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon View PostYou can't train a girl to sing with a boy's voice, or vice versa. Each voice has its unique quality - though of course you can get them to use different registers, or adjust any vibrato, or change the tone somewhat.
Yes - and most of the time I bet you can! But that was my earlier point - some girl ensembles, by chance, seem to sound so like boys that one can be mistaken, at least in the short term.
Comment
-
-
Paul Sherratt
Jonathan Miller included the voice of Tammy Wynette in a list of sounds that tingled his factor.
I'm with him on that score.
Comment
-
Originally posted by doversoul View PostThinking about the difference between boy’s and girls’ voice, did Britten write Flora’s part with a girl’s voice in mind?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Simon View PostDid Britten do anything with girls in mind?
I belong in the company of those who prefer boys' voices for liturgical music. Given notes around Middle C, where the chest register is usually unmistakeable, or some high blasts requiring great power, I can distinguish boys from girls. Without those clues, my innocent ear can easily mis-identify, both ways round and for both solo and chorus, despite nearly 60 years of listening; yet I still choose to believe that boys pack a special punch. But there is rarely any difficulty in distinguishing children's voices from mature women's voices - that is the really meaningful watershed. I'm therefore intrigued by the 8kHz 'shimmer' that started this thread: might there not even be an evolutionary advantage in children's voices (screaming, perhaps) having an unambiguous sonority?Last edited by decantor; 07-01-11, 20:48.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by decantor View Post....might there not even be an evolutionary advantage in children's voices (screaming, perhaps) having an unambiguous sonority?
Comment
-
-
Exactly agree, Simon.
The under/overtones in boys' voices are usually unmistakable. Interestingly, boys have just a tad more strain producing / reaching for certain frequencies and in that tension you can detect the masculine. Girls generally sail through more evenly and in the process actually flatten out tensions and excitements by finding it usually easier to sing certain parts of the stave. Don't ask me why, I don't know. Just that composers of yesteryear intuitively knew where these tension points are and exploited them to dramatic effect. Besides the fact that the boy voice is what they heard every day and thus wrote for, responding again intuitively to the topography of it.
Comment
-
-
Simon
re: #19 - I'd have a go Wolsey - if the web address you provided could be contacted! Could you have another look, please? Cheers!
Comment
-
Simon and Wolsey. I've probably posted along these lines before, but I can remember being bowled over by Salisbury's first CE broadcast with girls. I was expecting (unjustly) a somewhat effete sound, but on the contrary a strong and confident performance was elicited by Richard Seal, indeed a pioneer. The tone had an 'edge' to it, and was by no means pure 'head voice', as I recall.
Comment
-
Comment