Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro
View Post
Specifically organ
Collapse
X
-
Cornet IV
-
Originally posted by Cornet IV View PostNot really my field as my interest lies in small-scaled classical instruments; I prefer to leave the symphonic leviathans to others. But I think his inspiration probably was Cliquot, just as in turn, C-C inspired Henry Willis and later the Cassavant Freres. Produced some truly wonderful instruments without which I suspect that Saint-Saens, Widor, Faure, Vierne et al might have written differently. My experience of his orgues is limited but in my view his best is in St Sulpice. I think there are at least a couple of C-C's in GB - from memory, Paisley might be one.
Thanks for reminding me (see above); I have heard that organ on quite a few occasions.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Cornet IV View PostMy experience of his orgues is limited but in my view his best is in St Sulpice. I think there are at least a couple of C-C's in GB - from memory, Paisley might be one.
Comment
-
-
Cornet IV
Originally posted by subcontrabass View PostProbably the least interesting of Bach's organ toccatas. Technically not particularly difficult. Fugue lacks a countersubject.
"Oh yes" I responded, and gave them the Dorian. Nobody noticed a thing and I had a lot more fun!
Furthermore, so much rubbish is attached to it - things such as it was written for solo violin and it wasn't Bach anyway. Strange how supporters of the latter postulation never suggest who the author might have been if it wasn't JSB. Certainly, 565 is one of Bach's least accomplished works but unquestionably it is his, if only because it could not have been written by anyone else, although Nicholas Bruhns on a good day might, perhaps, have been a contender. Now, if the conspiracy theorists want something to occupy themselves, they should consider the first (C maj) from the Eight Little Preludes and Fugues. Bach could not possibly have written anything so banal - Mozart or Clementi, yes, but not The Master.
565 makes me liverish!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cornet IV View PostBWV 565 has become so terribly hackneyed that it is difficult to judge it with much objectivity. Not so long ago, Tracy and Wayne were was discussing their wedding and said "Do you know Toccata and Fugue in D minor?"
"Oh yes" I responded, and gave them the Dorian. Nobody noticed a thing and I had a lot more fun!
How snobbish and unprofessional of you.
Comment
-
-
paul duggan2
Originally posted by Cornet IV View PostBWV 565 has become so terribly hackneyed that it is difficult to judge it with much objectivity. Not so long ago, Tracy and Wayne were was discussing their wedding and said "Do you know Toccata and Fugue in D minor?"
"Oh yes" I responded, and gave them the Dorian. Nobody noticed a thing and I had a lot more fun!
Furthermore, so much rubbish is attached to it - things such as it was written for solo violin and it wasn't Bach anyway. Strange how supporters of the latter postulation never suggest who the author might have been if it wasn't JSB. Certainly, 565 is one of Bach's least accomplished works but unquestionably it is his, if only because it could not have been written by anyone else, although Nicholas Bruhns on a good day might, perhaps, have been a contender. Now, if the conspiracy theorists want something to occupy themselves, they should consider the first (C maj) from the Eight Little Preludes and Fugues. Bach could not possibly have written anything so banal - Mozart or Clementi, yes, but not The Master.
565 makes me liverish!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cornet IV View Post... Furthermore, so much rubbish is attached to it - things such as it was written for solo violin and it wasn't Bach anyway. Strange how supporters of the latter postulation never suggest who the author might have been if it wasn't JSB. ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Cornet IV View PostCertainly, 565 is one of Bach's least accomplished works but unquestionably it is his, if only because it could not have been written by anyone else,
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Wolsey View PostPaisley Abbey is in Scotland; St Michael's Abbey, Farnborough is in Hampshire. Both have websites.
Could we please have some consistency here?
EITHER:
Paisley Abbey is in Scotland; St Michael's Abbey, Farnborough is in England
OR:
Paisley Abbey is in Renfrewshire; St Michael's Abbey, Farnborough is in Hampshire
Comment
-
-
Extended Play
Originally posted by mangerton View PostI'm on my high horse a bit, but this sort of thing happens all too frequently in the anglo-centric media.
Could we please have some consistency here?
EITHER:
Paisley Abbey is in Scotland; St Michael's Abbey, Farnborough is in England
OR:
Paisley Abbey is in Renfrewshire; St Michael's Abbey, Farnborough is in Hampshire
(Have already dived for cover!)
Comment
-
Mr Stoat
Originally posted by mangerton View PostI'm on my high horse a bit, but this sort of thing happens all too frequently in the anglo-centric media.
Could we please have some consistency here?
EITHER:
Paisley Abbey is in Scotland; St Michael's Abbey, Farnborough is in England
OR:
Paisley Abbey is in Renfrewshire; St Michael's Abbey, Farnborough is in Hampshire
Comment
Comment