Originally posted by VodkaDilc
View Post
A SERVICE FOR ADVENT WITH CAROLS 27th Nov 2011
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Listened to the first two items with teeth gritted. Thought they were rather unpleasant and turned off. I would normally walk over burning coals to hear this choir, but not on this occasion. There was a terrible claustrophobic quality to the sound. I thought the piece with the saxaphone quite horrible and the first hymn just didn't seem to flow somehow. Perhaps I was just the wrong way out.
Comment
-
-
Liked the Swayne very much. Fiendish to sing, but there was real discipline and attack, boys sounding like real boys at the bottom of the register on the repeated 'an apple' like a drum riff and then to soar to higher areas. Terrific, exciting drive from the men in that carol too. Service opening was arresting too. That sax was eerie and effective.
Harvey I also liked very much. Much bleaker language, some excellent solo work, instrumentals worked, and I liked the space and air round the lines too. It was one where the dead acoustic of a packed St John's Chapel really worked to make the piece tense, waiting for the next musical event.
Still found the Guerero and the Stanford curiously out of place in that service. Can't put my finger on it - just against the context of the other solo pieces and particularly the O Antiphons, they seemed just.......odd. Yes, I know that the Rorate Coeli is smack on the Advent liturgy, but it just felt part of a different liturgical world. Perversely, I DID like the Eccard.
Choir, particularly the men seemed in very good nick.Last edited by DracoM; 28-11-11, 10:02.
Comment
-
-
Mr Stoat
Originally posted by Vile Consort View PostListened to the first two items with teeth gritted. Thought they were rather unpleasant and turned off. I would normally walk over burning coals to hear this choir, but not on this occasion. There was a terrible claustrophobic quality to the sound. I thought the piece with the saxaphone quite horrible and the first hymn just didn't seem to flow somehow. Perhaps I was just the wrong way out.
I liked the sound-world of the first carol, but loving the tune "straight" without any embellishment - and at a faster tempo - this didn't "work" for me. Took me a while to work out that the instrument was a saxophone in that acoustic!!
Perhaps the Stanford Mag was programmed, along with the Gardiner, as a "lollipop" to counter the Neild, Swayne, Harvey etc?
I enjoyed the service. A few years ago there was a tendency to "theme" the programme with a lot of, eg Mendelsohn, with little "carol" content.
I found Wachet Auf better "balanced" than last year, although as someone has already mentioned, I find it an anti-climax after the last hymn.
Comment
-
And here again, they seem tied into the tradition. Wachet Auf every year.
Liturgically, it may well be right, but musically, theatrically, it is very obviously wrong after such a rabble rouser of a final hymn and it just seems a bit after the Lord Mayor's Procession. Bach it may be, but, sorry, I wish they would re-think the final five or so minutes of that service.
Comment
-
-
Mr Stoat
Originally posted by DracoM View PostAnd here again, they seem tied into the tradition. Wachet Auf every year.
Liturgically, it may well be right, but musically, theatrically, it is very obviously wrong after such a rabble rouser of a final hymn and it just seems a bit after the Lord Mayor's Procession. Bach it may be, but, sorry, I wish they would re-think the final five or so minutes of that service.
I find "In Dulci Jubilo" at the end of Kings on Christmas Eve a similar (albeit less so) anti-climax if played on "authentic" registration.
Comment
-
Mr Stoat
Originally posted by DracoM View PostGood suggestions - but I disagree about the KCC finisher. It too is a very damp squib after everything. In fact, I freuquently turn off after the final hymn for that very reason. No sense of theatre, these guys!!
Comment
-
Well, Mrs Ardcarp and I have finally finished LA-ing the Service (with a fine-tooth comb) and (though one is not supposed to use capitals) would like to give it
A BIG UNRESERVED THUMBS UP
...ok, several (obviously).
We thought it was a beautifully balanced choice of music, extremely well-rehearsed and executed, and in short, the best St John's Advent thingy for a long time. Like Draco, I thought the Swayne and Harvey were fine pieces. Andrew N. had (it seemsd to us) a clear vision of how he wanted stuff to go, and even if one didn't always agree (e.g. Stanford Mag a bit of a romp IOHO) he brought it off really well. There was some lovely controlled singing....all the more creditable for having been done in a packed chapel and under a big metaphorical spotlight.
Particularly interesting was The Cherry Tree Carol...same version as on the old Guest LP, but sounding very different. In many ways it proves that AN has put his stamp on the choir.
I hope Draco will forgive me for quoting:
I wonder if, rather like KCC, their 'big' services might have become a straitjacket, such that improvisation of format, structure and musical repertoire is constrained by the need to remember or be reminded of their global audience. In the end, they and KCC can far too readily be defined by the image makers and even embalmed in aspic by their very successes in a particular format.
These are fine musicians, and at times I feel immensely sorry for them as they set out on what might seem like both millstone and the annual treadmill. As soon as a choir become indelibly associated with an annual ritual, they can become trapped.
On the subject of stops .....Wachet Auf, what's wrong with it? Who needs a 'big finisher?' We are in the season of Advent after all, and the slightly austere HIPP way of playing it these days seems to chime well with the penitence we're all supposed to be feeling despite Tesco's halls having been decked for weeks already.
Mrs Ardcarps's only adverse comment: "There's too many women in religion these days". (I couldn't possibly comment.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DracoM View PostSo sad that there are no more comments on this major service.
Comment
-
-
Let's get the Bad News out of the way first: I loathed the Nield, and clichés like "cultural vandalism" floated around in my head. I thought, when the sax first entered, that the fire alarm was sounding; as it continued, I considered switching off. What a tune to try to embellish with saxophone recitatives! Unforgivable! So say I.
There followed, thank heaven, a very fine Advent service. I remembered the Swayne from its first outing, and preferred this version - the cello somehow seemed better balanced with the choir. I thought the new Harvey piece was nicely worked for the occasion - plangent and lyrical, but still with some twists to negotiate. For the rest, I enjoyed Guerrero's flowing polyphony despite being on tenterhooks that a role had been found for the saxophone or serpent, and thought that the stately tempo of the Gardner added dignity to the piece, as it can easily become breathlessly jig-like. And the choir were indeed in mighty fine voice, well transmitted to us from the producer's van.
And I'd add a little personal - and, I fear, contentious - note. I find the congregational hymns in these services an unwelcome intrusion, as much when I'm present as when I listen on R3. The nebulous, heaving mass of sound contrasts so violently with the exciting precision and musicality of the choir that for me it comes close to ruining the service. It's like giving a punk band a gig between the movements of a Haydn string quartet.
In re: the closing voluntary. I abstain. My preferred option would be a Hakim improvisation!
Comment
-
Comment