Worcester Cathedral: Evensong and Francis Jackson's Organ Recital, 1.10.2011

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gainasbass
    • Jan 2025

    Worcester Cathedral: Evensong and Francis Jackson's Organ Recital, 1.10.2011

    Last Saturday, 1 October, 2011, I was privileged to attend Francis Jackson's organ recital on the occasion of the Third Anniversary of the Dedication of the Kenneth Tickell Quire Organ. As this was my first visit to the Cathedral for a number of years it was my first opportunity to hear the superb tone colours and power of this magnificent instrument, truly worthy of such a fine building.

    As to FJ's recital, it was both most memorable and enjoyable, and easy to forget that the exponent was - all but a day - 94 years young! Well done Francis!

    Evensong preceded the organ recital, and on my entering the nave I summised that the choir was in the quire (if you see what I mean!) practising for the service. I was immediately struck by the strength and tone of the treble line, and on venturing further eastwards I was pleasantly surprised to see that it was the girls singing with the lay clerks. At Evensong the service was extremely well ordered, the choir ably directed by the AO Christopher Allsop, with Adrian Lucas providing sensitive and exciting accompaniments to the psalms and Darke in F; and concluding with a spirited voluntary - a 'tuba tune' (not Cocker). The unaccompanied parts of the service, notably the Rose responses and the Stanford anthem 'O Living Will' were sensitively phrased and executed.

    What I am saying about this service is two-fold. First, although on the face of it this was a 'normal' Saturday Evensong, it would have been more than appropriate as a R3 broadcast Choral Evensong (without the attendant preparation etc.), and obviating the need for (adverse) criticism, often justified, that has been expressed in these boards. Second, as someone who has been brought up to believe that the all male cathedral choir should be nurtured and encouraged, this service in particular convinced me of the valued place in the scheme of things which girls' top lines provide (especially when like those at Worcester they are well trained and disciplined) in removing some of the daily pressure from the boys. One additional point: to the best of my knowledge the Cathedral service list did not indicate whether it was the boys or girls singing the service. I am convinced that whether or not this was intended, it is the right course of action, for I admit that, had I been previously aware that the boys were not singing on that day, I would not have looked forward to the service as much. I now take comfort in the fact that whether it was either the boys or the girls, it was the choir of Worcester Cathedral and that, whilst the two top lines may be different in texture to some extent (and I have said previously that before I could see the choir practising, I could not tell it was the girls) this can only increase the choir's efficacy.

    So, thank you Worcester Cathedral for providing such a fine instrument on which to enhance FJ's recital, and to the music foundation for demonstrating just how much an efficient girls' top line can add to quality of liturgical worship.
  • DracoM
    Host
    • Mar 2007
    • 12993

    #2
    < it was the choir of Worcester Cathedral >

    Pedant alert: might it not more accurately be 'A choir of Worcester Cathedral'?

    Comment

    • Simon

      #3
      There's no doubt that a good girl top line can sound brilliant. There's no doubt that it's "a good thing" to encourage girls to be part of the cathedral music scene. There's no doubt that a carefully chosen mixed top line can also work and has its place at certain times and in certain celebrations. And, whilst I don't think it's a question of "taking off the pressure" from the boys - we thrived on pressure! - it does mean at some foundations that there are more sung evensongs than would be the case without a contribution from the girls - another obvious "good thing", especially for visitors and congregations.

      But these benefits, in my view, must rest on the foundation that the girls are supporting the traditional male choir establishment, and not slowly beginning to replace it as the easy way out when recruiting boys becomes difficult. Most of us know where the good boy top lines are: some of the best are in rural areas and small population centres where one would imagine there would be such difficulties - and indeed there are. But the boys succeed and are good because of inspired and hardworking music departments, often attached to local schools, because of financial support from cathedral authorities, charitable donations and trusts and because of DoMs who are imaginative, creative and brilliant at their jobs.

      As long as the attitude of "well, we can always get girls - their voices don't break" doesn't dilute the continuing efforts to recruit and retain the traditional boy top lines, I can't imagine many would have anything against the current situation where we can, as did gainasbass, enjoy hearing girls from time to time.

      Comment

      • AscribeUntoTheLad

        #4
        Simon, you're only considering two possibilities: girls being on the periphery of cathedral music, or girls replacing boys entirely in cathedrals. What's wrong with set-ups such as at York, where the girls and boys sing an equal number of services?

        Comment

        • Simon

          #5
          Nothing wrong with it, as such, of course, but for me it begs immediately the question "why are the boys not singing the majority of the services?" as they used to do.

          Until I knew the answer to that question I don't think I could offer any further worthwhile comment.

          Comment

          • Magnificat

            #6
            The girls at Worcester are in the age range 12 to 18 which makes may of them at any one time young women rather than girls. They ought to make a good sound and would be much easier to train than a choir consisting of girls in the same age range as the boys 8 to 14. ( a proper girls' choir in a cathedral context in my opinion ).

            To call all the girls, boys and men the cathedral choir may be incorrect as, possibly, the cathedral Statutes ought to be changed to accomodate this definition. The real situation in most places with both boys and girls is more than likely that there is the cathedral choir of boys and men ( as per statute ) and the cathedral girls' choir who on occasion sing with the men of the cathedral choir.

            I am rapidly becoming of the opinion that the increasing difficulties in recruiting boys will, in the not too distant future, mean a mixed top line of boys and girls will be the norm in cathedral choirs which could then, justifiably, still be referred to as the cathedral choir ( again will this need a change in the Statutes in some places ( probably the older Foundations at least )?

            VCC.

            Comment

            Working...
            X