Does the Mail know / care about Jamiewhall's allegations?
Lincoln makes the Daily Mail
Collapse
X
-
Simon
Rumblings of discontent reached me a while ago. I can't confirm whether the post was advertised or not, as I'm unlikely to see such adverts.
The Lincoln choral establishment seems to have an unfortunate propensity for getting itself into unnecessary difficulties with some regularity. It's a shame.
Comment
-
Jamiewhall
I've since been informed that the alto vacancy was in fact for a choral scholar, not a lay clerk. All this fuss (much of it my own) over a one year appointment! Obviously my criticism of Lincoln was a huge overreaction. My sincere apologies to anyone who this may have upset.
Comment
-
Magnificat
Still begs the question as to how Lincoln will use the lady in her year there if she is indeed a soprano?
As far as Lincoln choir is concerned I am still hoping that one day the boys and men will once again broadcast CE rather than the combined forces ( including the new choral scholar).
VCC
Comment
-
bull-scheidt
-
Originally posted by Jamiewhall View PostWhether or not you agree with female altos being allowed to join cathedral choirs is beside the point on this one. Lincoln Cathedral appointed without advertising the position and against the wishes of the rest of the back row, who have been told to keep quiet! And who is this marvellous new contralto? The girlfriend of a current Lincoln choral scholar and, apparently, a soprano!
So everything that the Lincoln spokesman (or woman!) said about her being the best for the job and how they're simply trying to produce the best possible music "to the glory of God" is a load of bull to cover up the fact that presumably somebody couldn't be arsed to go through the appointment process.
You do realize that it's completely untrue to suggest that there was no appointment process? But then facts clearly don't get in the way of a bit of mud-slinging.
Comment
-
-
makropulos
Jamie did apologise as soon as he found out that he had been mis/ill-informed (#33). Let’s accept his apology for this time.
This thread has been most interesting and I hope it will resume the discussion of different voices and their effects. And English cathedral tradition.
Going back to Iestyn Davies's article posted by David Underdown (#22). I remember reading his interview some while ago (2009?) in which he said that he’d rather be thought as just a voice along with mezzo or tenor rather than bracketed as countertenor. He seems to have changed his thinking. Or is he saying the same thing? Sorry, this is a bit off the topic.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by doversoul View Postmakropulos
Jamie did apologise as soon as he found out that he had been mis/ill-informed (#33). Let’s accept his apology for this time.
This thread has been most interesting and I hope it will resume the discussion of different voices and their effects. And English cathedral tradition.
Going back to Iestyn Davies's article posted by David Underdown (#22). I remember reading his interview some while ago (2009?) in which he said that he’d rather be thought as just a voice along with mezzo or tenor rather than bracketed as countertenor. He seems to have changed his thinking. Or is he saying the same thing? Sorry, this is a bit off the topic.
Comment
-
-
Cases of the difficulty of filling the "adult" voices in cathedral choirs are legion. It is fine to advertise vacant positions but the main problem lies in prospective candidates finding other employment to make up a realistic income on which to survive when those other employers have to accept the peculiar working hours demanded by the cathedral choir. No cathedral is going to move CE to 6.30pm because they cannot get enough singers. This usually means altos, tenors and basses finding a part-time teaching post in a sympathetic school (or schools) on the doorstep of the cathedral. Both candidates and cathedral choirs have to be realistic in order to maintain the quantity of adult singers and the quality of the choir.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by doversoul View PostGoing back to Iestyn Davies's article posted by David Underdown (#22). I remember reading his interview some while ago (2009?) in which he said that he’d rather be thought as just a voice along with mezzo or tenor rather than bracketed as countertenor. He seems to have changed his thinking. Or is he saying the same thing?
You might get similar objections from actresses if a young man was given the part of Ophelia or Desdemona in a high profile new Shakespearean production.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
FWIW, I would suggest that jamiewhall's posting was not 'dishonest'. It seemed to me indeed 'knee-jerk', but based on what one might surmise was an honest reading of incompletely heard / gossip / hearsay. There is a big difference between that and conscious and fomenting 'spin', surely?
It also seemed to me that whatever the provenance, he was expressing a very real fear of many young singers / performers who find their place in their chosen world usurped by what they / their mates might call unfair substitution. He is surely right to suggest that if the Lincoln practice became widespread, young male altos / countertenors would become an extinct species within 30 years and more or less unviable as a career option. The performance of Early Music of various kinds would, IMHO, be irretrievably impoverished.
So while one might regret the haste, at least that haste has turned up a real lurking fear that DoMs / Ds and Cs nationwide might well be less choosy and looking elsewhere than for men to people bits of the back rows.
A door shuts, maybe never to open again?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DracoM View PostSo while one might regret the haste, at least that haste has turned up a real lurking fear that DoMs / Ds and Cs nationwide might well be less choosy and looking elsewhere than for men to people bits of the back rows.
A door shuts, maybe never to open again?
Comment
-
-
Jamiewhall
To clarify: The content of my original message is true if my (I assume) reliable source is to be believed. I just don't think filling a scholar post in this way is unusual or that big a deal. Hence the back-step in the intensity of my complaint. I would not post any information based on idle gossip, though in this instance the lack of one tiny detail made a huge difference.
Comment
Comment