As ardcarp says, there was lots of contrast in the psalm and elsewhere, so perhaps the broadcast did not do full justice.
But I have indeed heard another person say that the choir (in its current incarnation) can sound a bit 'shouty', though perhaps forceful/forthright/vigorous and energetic might be a fairer description.
As someone who has sung there only as a member of the congregation, albeit in both the nave and the choir, I'd say that it's not a rewarding place to sing in: there's very little warmth fed back from the building and it sounds like you're very much on your own.
And on Wednesday there were only 6 adults each side, so 12 in total, supporting the 23 upper voices: perhaps they were singing out a little more on grounds of overall balance and it came over that way more through the microphones than in the building itself.
Treat yourself to the Beatam CD mentioned above: I don't recall any problems with that (though of course that was a former group of singers).
But I have indeed heard another person say that the choir (in its current incarnation) can sound a bit 'shouty', though perhaps forceful/forthright/vigorous and energetic might be a fairer description.
As someone who has sung there only as a member of the congregation, albeit in both the nave and the choir, I'd say that it's not a rewarding place to sing in: there's very little warmth fed back from the building and it sounds like you're very much on your own.
And on Wednesday there were only 6 adults each side, so 12 in total, supporting the 23 upper voices: perhaps they were singing out a little more on grounds of overall balance and it came over that way more through the microphones than in the building itself.
Treat yourself to the Beatam CD mentioned above: I don't recall any problems with that (though of course that was a former group of singers).
Comment