CE Guildford Cathedral Jan 15th 2020 [A]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DracoM
    Host
    • Mar 2007
    • 12986

    CE Guildford Cathedral Jan 15th 2020 [A]

    CE Guildford Cathedral Jan 15th 2020 [A]
    (First broadcast 15 January 1997)


    Order of Service:


    Introit: Great and Marvellous Are Thy Works (Tomkins)
    Responses: Millington
    Psalm 78 (Bayley, Monk, Turle, Rogers, Walmisley)
    First Lesson: Isaiah 49: 7-13
    Canticles: Day in B flat
    Second Lesson: 1 John 2: 1-14
    Anthem: When Jesus Our Lord (Mendelssohn)
    Hymn: O Worship the Lord (Was Lebet)


    Voluntary: Toccata Prelude on Von Himmel Hoch (Edmundson)


    Geoffrey Morgan (Sub-organist)
    Andrew Millington (Organist and Master of the Music)


    An archive recording from Guildford Cathedral (First broadcast 15 January 1997).
  • DracoM
    Host
    • Mar 2007
    • 12986

    #2
    Reminder: today @ 3.30 pm

    Comment

    • jonfan
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 1445

      #3
      A total joy from beginning to end. Such attack and enthusiasm from the choir, the top line in particular. I relished the determination to savour all the varied corners of the psalm. The anthem was beautifully done with appropriate romantic feeling. Attention and excitement held to the end through the final hymn into the storming of heaven in the final voluntary. Great stuff.

      Comment

      • DracoM
        Host
        • Mar 2007
        • 12986

        #4
        Indeed.
        Q: is / was Guildford tricky to record in?

        Comment

        • Pulcinella
          Host
          • Feb 2014
          • 11062

          #5
          Originally posted by DracoM View Post
          Indeed.
          Q: is / was Guildford tricky to record in?
          A: I don't know, but the 'runner-up' BAL Enigma recording (RPO/Del Mar) was made there in 1975, according to the liner notes.

          Comment

          • Frances_iom
            Full Member
            • Mar 2007
            • 2415

            #6
            Originally posted by DracoM View Post
            Indeed.
            Q: is / was Guildford tricky to record in?
            Its acoustics were very bad - when the Guildford Philharmonic moved from the old civic hall (now totally rebuilt) to the cathedral for its concerts then unless you were in the front row of the seats you could not tell what language the choir was singing in - the acoustics were that bad. I believe some screens + other techniques were used to overcome the myriad of reflections from the brick walls.

            Comment

            • ardcarp
              Late member
              • Nov 2010
              • 11102

              #7
              Just in case anyone's forgotten:

              Against all the odds, and without a single formal musical qualification to his name, in May 1960, Barry [Rose] was appointed as the first Organist and Master of the Choristers of the new Guildford Cathedral. This controversial appointment would not have been made without the foresight and wisdom of the then Provost of Guildford, The Very Reverend Walter Boulton, who was to be shamefully passed over, when the appointment of the first Dean of the new Cathedral was made.

              Once in Guildford, Barry set about creating a musical foundation which would bring daily sung Services to the new Cathedral. Over the first year or so there was the inevitable hesitant start by the boys, but they were encouraged and supported by a most expert and musical group of Lay Clerks, many of whom were accomplished soloists in their own right. The Guildford choir soon established itself in the forefront of choral music of the time, achieving widespread recognition through its several best-selling recordings for EMI, both on the HMV label, and on the newly founded Music for Pleasure label
              So quite a bit of recording went on.

              Comment

              • MrGongGong
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 18357

                #8
                Originally posted by Frances_iom View Post
                Its acoustics were very bad - when the Guildford Philharmonic moved from the old civic hall (now totally rebuilt) to the cathedral for its concerts then unless you were in the front row of the seats you could not tell what language the choir was singing in - the acoustics were that bad. I believe some screens + other techniques were used to overcome the myriad of reflections from the brick walls.
                Is that "bad" ?


                Asking for a friend

                Comment

                • Serial_Apologist
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 37812

                  #9
                  Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                  Is that "bad" ?


                  Asking for a friend
                  Depends on the kinds of music the architects and their sponsors had in mind for the place I guess. The acoustics were just wonderful for Tallis and Byrd when I sang there in the early days of the cathedral in my school choir - amazing resonance.

                  Comment

                  • MrGongGong
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 18357

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                    Depends on the kinds of music the architects and their sponsors had in mind for the place I guess. The acoustics were just wonderful for Tallis and Byrd when I sang there in the early days of the cathedral in my school choir - amazing resonance.
                    Absolutely

                    When I moved to Lincoln about 30 years ago I always found it amusing to read the review of the Halle's annual gig in the cathedral which usually described it as "cold and over resonant"

                    So you mean a huge symphony orchestra playing a Mozart symphony is a bit "blurred" ?
                    hummmmm

                    Comment

                    • Finzi4ever
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 601

                      #11
                      Originally posted by jonfan View Post
                      A total joy from beginning to end. Such attack and enthusiasm from the choir, the top line in particular. I relished the determination to savour all the varied corners of the psalm. The anthem was beautifully done with appropriate romantic feeling. Attention and excitement held to the end through the final hymn into the storming of heaven in the final voluntary. Great stuff.
                      Quite agree and a treat to have the full 15th evening, done (at speed understandably) with feeling and drama!

                      Comment

                      • Serial_Apologist
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 37812

                        #12
                        Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                        Absolutely

                        When I moved to Lincoln about 30 years ago I always found it amusing to read the review of the Halle's annual gig in the cathedral which usually described it as "cold and over resonant"

                        So you mean a huge symphony orchestra playing a Mozart symphony is a bit "blurred" ?
                        hummmmm
                        Another bad experience of live non-intended Cathedral music was the one I had of the David Murray Quartet in Bristol Cathedral in around 1990. I was near the back; nevertheless, those right at the front said the sound was just as blurred, particularly when the band went into fast tempos. Ironically (perhaps!) the opening unaccompanied act judged the place exactly right: the berimbau-playing and chanting Brazilian musician Nana Vasconcelos, who understood the 11th century acoustics perfectly and deployed them as magnificently as if he was in ECM's recording studios in Oslo!

                        Comment

                        • cat
                          Full Member
                          • May 2019
                          • 401

                          #13
                          Another problem with Guildford besides the acoustic is that the two sides of the choir are half a mile apart.

                          Comment

                          • Miles Coverdale
                            Late Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 639

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Frances_iom View Post
                            Its acoustics were very bad - when the Guildford Philharmonic moved from the old civic hall (now totally rebuilt) to the cathedral for its concerts then unless you were in the front row of the seats you could not tell what language the choir was singing in - the acoustics were that bad. I believe some screens + other techniques were used to overcome the myriad of reflections from the brick walls.
                            When the cathedral was first built the acoustic was very reverberant, some would say too much so. Later, acoustic plaster was added to the ceiling to dampen it down. When I was there, one of my colleagues played me a tape made by a small group of singers shortly before the plaster was added, and the acoustic was certainly quite a lot bigger than it was when this service was recorded (not sure it's worth asking for a repeat fee 23 years after the event). What certainly could make ensemble with the organ difficult was the fact that most of it was round the corner in the north transept, with only the choir organ above the stalls on Cantoris, the organ loft being on Decani. There were also a couple of spots in the nave where the choir didn't sound quite together with the organ, even though it did elsewhere, which was a bit odd.
                            My boxes are positively disintegrating under the sheer weight of ticks. Ed Reardon

                            Comment

                            • DracoM
                              Host
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 12986

                              #15
                              Distance apart is what I vaguely remembered from many years ago, BUT it is pretty disconcerting to sing in such 'geography' I find. Would pro-lays / front line trebs etc have the same feeling? Is it a nightmare for the DoM quite apart from the recording engineer? Or do you just get used to it?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X