Originally posted by twmsioncati
View Post
CE St Mary's Collegiate Church, Warwick Wed, 7th June 2017
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mw963 View PostFor me, most - not all - younger girls' choirs can be easily distinguished by the sound of the vowels. Sometimes that "give-away" characteristic is trained out of them. But if it's there, and you mix it with the boys' sound, it dominates.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BasilHarwood View PostGenuinely intrigued to know what you mean by the vowel point. Can you say more?
Comment
-
-
I would like to say that girls' voices can be 'trained' to sing with exactly the same vowel-sounds (e.g. the 'oo') as boys'. Provided they can keep the awful mangling of pop-idols in a different compartment (same applies to boys too) there need be no problem. Time was when girls were not allowed anywhere near a church choir...even the meagrest village church choir....to the future Mrs A's chagrin. When in the 1960s 'straight' women's voices became acceptable, Mrs A and her contemporaries were in the forefront of straight consort singing, a tradition that followed through to our children and grandchildren.
So I do not accept that girls' voices need to sound different, at least in the method of production and the vowel sounds. There is maybe just one aspect that boys' voices have, especially in the years immediately before the change. That is a natural 'crescendo' as they go up the scale. This is sometimes though not always absent from girls of the same age.
I have heard many examples of boy and girl choristers singing together with glorious effect. I recall with great pleasure Malcolm Archer's last carol service from Wells.
Comment
-
-
Totally agree about Malcolm Archer and Wells - a fine mixing / training / finished article.
I agree too that the girls and boys NEED not sound different: my question was whether DoMs found that will they, nill they, boys are more likely to imitate older girls singing alongside them in mixed ensembles?
For example, it always surprised me how fast a boy's voice could / would, whatever his background beforehand, come to sound like, even indistinguishable from, voices around him in a choir he had only just entered. I have sung behind treble lines in which the DoM has actually picked out a model treb he / she wanted that newbie to imitate. Is that a common method? or it is just osmosis? And common to either gender?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DracoM View PostI agree too that the girls and boys NEED not sound different: my question was whether DoMs found that will they, nill they, boys are more likely to imitate older girls singing alongside them in mixed ensembles?
When the boys and girls are of different age ranges, their sound can be very different, despite having choral trainers in common. Indeed, in deciding to form a choir of 13-18-year-old girls, a DoM has probably already decided that he/she wishes them to have a sound, personality and repertoire distinctly different from that which the boys have developed over very many, if not hundreds, of years. The Truro boys and (older) girls normally sing separately with the back row, with their own distinctive repertoire (eg their broadcast CE of music solely by female composers earlier in the year). When occasionally the top rows of different age groups are combined, I would agree with mw963 when commenting above 'it tends to be the "sound" of the girls that dominates when normally separated choirs [of different age groups] sing together', qualified by my square brackets, though this doesn't mean that they don't combine successfully. Going back to Draco's point, our trebles do not attempt to emulate the more rounded, fuller and more powerful sound of our girls; even if they did try, they would most likely be told not to by th DoM. The boys' sound in our lovely acoustic has an unforced clarity and directness which is lower in dB levels than the girls' output, but both are distinctive and equally admired.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BasilHarwood View PostGenuinely intrigued to know what you mean by the vowel point. Can you say more?
And I don't really agree with keraulophone on his (?) point about the mixing of choirs of *different* age groups, I was quite specifically meaning that a mixed choir of boys and younger girls tends to lead to that harsher "a" sound, if it's present in the girls' voices, dominating the whole sound.
But that's only my experience - and mainly from a few years ago.
It just shows how differently (in a scientific way) we all hear sound....
Comment
-
-
Been into the archives, and I have found a March 1993 broadcast from Salisbury billed as "sung by the girls and layclerks of the Cathedral Choir".
Is that the first one?
Would anyone like it on Dropbox - we have an incredibly slow ADSL connection but I could probably get it up by next Friday-ish(!) if anyone is interested.....
Just listening to it now, solo trebles' verse in office hymn, I defy anybody NOT to be able to say with confidence "those are girls singing".
live from Salisbury
Cathedral, sung by the girls and layclerks of the Cathedral Choir.
Introit: The Angel Gabriel (Traditional); Responses
(Smith); Psalm 119, vv 1-32 (Martin, Buck, Hopkins, Barnby); First Lesson:
Isaiah 52, vv 7-15; Office Hymn: The Lord whom earth and sea and sky (Veni redemptor);
Canticles: The Second
Service (Byrd); Second
Lesson: Luke I,vv26-38a; Anthem: A Hymn to the Virgin (Britten); Hymn: Sing we of the Blessed Mother (Abbot's Leigh): Litany with Ave Maria (Lindley); Organ
Voluntary: Fantasia (Gibbons).
Director Richard Seal.
Organist David Halls.Last edited by mw963; 11-06-17, 14:50.
Comment
-
-
The whole recording of Salisbury 1993 is now on Dropbox.
Rather than making the link public (which I suspect is poor netiquette) I suggest that if anyone does want to hear it they drop me a PM and I'll supply the details.
Although from the lack of response to my previous I'm not sure there's much of an appetite.
I've also located the early 90's recording of St Mary's Warwick.
Comment
-
Comment