Vespers at Hampton Court

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nevilevelis

    #16
    Originally posted by Miles Coverdale View Post
    The piece is also the subject of an interesting article in Early Music by Stephen Rice. John Milsom has also made an edition which was, I think, recorded by New College a number of years ago.
    Interesting. Thank you. I shall look out for it. I saw a snippet of the Rice article and rather assumed he may have done one himself. I sang both the reconstructed part and the Contratenor recently in Jon Dixon's edition and was not entirely convinced either by the edition or the performance. The assembled cognoscenti thought it wasn't Tallis's best. It is not a setting which suits an army of trebles, however fine. Afterwards one of the lay clerks suggested I have a go at it m'self! I now think they are both very fine, of course.

    Cheers,

    NVV.
    Last edited by Guest; 10-02-16, 22:54.

    Comment

    • Miles Coverdale
      Late Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 639

      #17
      I don't think John Milsom's is available to buy. The piece was also one of those studied in a very interesting reconstruction workshop held in Cambridge last November as part of the Tudor Partbooks project at which both John and Stephen were present.

      I don't find Jon Dixon's version very convincing either. If I remember right (don't have a copy to hand), he used the Roman chant, not the Sarum, on the grounds that the Sarum one wouldn't have been used after the Reformation, though why he thinks the Roman one would have I don't quite understand.
      My boxes are positively disintegrating under the sheer weight of ticks. Ed Reardon

      Comment

      • Nevilevelis

        #18
        Originally posted by Miles Coverdale View Post
        I don't think John Milsom's is available to buy. The piece was also one of those studied in a very interesting reconstruction workshop held in Cambridge last November as part of the Tudor Partbooks project at which both John and Stephen were present.

        I don't find Jon Dixon's version very convincing either. If I remember right (don't have a copy to hand), he used the Roman chant, not the Sarum, on the grounds that the Sarum one wouldn't have been used after the Reformation, though why he thinks the Roman one would have I don't quite understand.
        I cannot access Rice's article on Oxford Journals - something to do with cookies.

        Yes, odd reasoning in Dixon's edition. The 1559 Act of Uniformity finally abolished the Sarum rite, but not the chant itself, I would presume...
        Last edited by Guest; 11-02-16, 13:32.

        Comment

        • Magnificat

          #19
          Originally posted by Nevilevelis View Post
          I sang New Rite Vespers at St. Paul's Cathedral a couple of weeks ago. Westm. C., Westm. Abbey & St. Paul's regularly sing their services in one another's places as part of Christian Unity Week.
          I wonder why boys and men were not used for this special service? After all such would have been the forces used prior to the Reformation. Why import The Sixteen?

          VCC

          Comment

          • ardcarp
            Late member
            • Nov 2010
            • 11102

            #20
            You're incorrigible VCC. The Sixteen were probably the Rolls Royce option....but agreed, for authenticity, maybe choristers of the Chapels Royal?

            I feel a naughty urge to say that as.....
            The service was recorded by BBC Radio 3 for a world exclusive broadcast
            ....I am surprised a certain other group of singers was not used.......
            Last edited by ardcarp; 11-02-16, 19:38. Reason: Afterthought

            Comment

            • decantor
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 521

              #21
              Originally posted by Magnificat View Post
              I wonder why boys and men were not used for this special service? After all such would have been the forces used prior to the Reformation. Why import The Sixteen?

              VCC
              Ecumenism, perhaps? The Sixteen as honest brokers between the service and its venue?

              Comment

              • Nevilevelis

                #22
                Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
                The Sixteen were probably the Rolls Royce option....but agreed, for authenticity, maybe choristers of the Chapels Royal?
                Authentic? Who said authentic? New Rite Vespers wasn't big in the early 1540's.

                Comment

                • ardcarp
                  Late member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 11102

                  #23
                  VCC had a point...Hampton Court, Wolsey, Herny VIII, Field of the Cloth of Gold, the (portable) Chapels Royal, probably William Cornysh (younger or ellder; can't remember which), choirs on French and English sides....probably a male-ish coterie.
                  Last edited by ardcarp; 12-02-16, 06:00.

                  Comment

                  • Miles Coverdale
                    Late Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 639

                    #24
                    Originally posted by jean View Post
                    If it's Latin it's presumably before the Prayer Book, but if it really is a pair with the Nunc it's not written fro Vespers, is it?
                    Let's not forget that the Liber Precum Publicarum, for use in the universities of Oxford and Cambridge, and schools such as Winchester and Eton, was published in 1560.
                    My boxes are positively disintegrating under the sheer weight of ticks. Ed Reardon

                    Comment

                    • jean
                      Late member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 7100

                      #25
                      True, places where Latin might be expected to be understanded of the people.

                      Comment

                      • Nevilevelis

                        #26
                        Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
                        VCC had a point...Hampton Court, Wolsey, Herny VIII, Field of the Cloth of Gold, the (potable) Chapels Royal, probably William Cornysh (younger or ellder; can't remember which), choirs on French and English sides....probably a male-ish coterie.
                        You would say that.

                        Comment

                        • Miles Coverdale
                          Late Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 639

                          #27
                          Originally posted by jean View Post
                          True, places where Latin might be expected to be understanded of the people.
                          And also places which may well have had choirs capable of singing polyphony.
                          My boxes are positively disintegrating under the sheer weight of ticks. Ed Reardon

                          Comment

                          • jean
                            Late member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 7100

                            #28
                            Well, I always rather like the theory that after the Roman rite had gone underground, such singing as was done at all was likely to have been around the kitchen table by persons of either sex (they would never have dared sing anything during an actual mass, which had to be completed as quickly as possible for fear of discovery).

                            Comment

                            • Miles Coverdale
                              Late Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 639

                              #29
                              But the LPP wasn't the Roman rite, it was the Anglican, reformed rite, just in Latin.

                              My point was that it is not inconceivable that Tallis's Mag and Nunc could have been used in a service of Latin Evensong, or Vesperam, as the LPP calls it.
                              My boxes are positively disintegrating under the sheer weight of ticks. Ed Reardon

                              Comment

                              • jean
                                Late member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 7100

                                #30
                                Yes I know, sorry - I just went off at a tangent.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X