CE 12.3.25: Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge [L]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30835

    CE 12.3.25: Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge [L]

    Live from the Chapel of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge

    Introit: Memento homo (Byrd)
    Responses: Leighton
    Psalms 65, 66, 67 (Russell, Garrett, Luard Smith)
    First Lesson: Genesis 11 vv1-9
    Office hymn: Jesu quadragenariae (plainsong)
    Canticles: Jesus College Service (Mathias)
    Second Lesson: Matthew 24 vv15-28
    Anthem: Solus ad Victimam (Leighton)
    Voluntary: Fantasia in C minor, BWV 562 (Bach)

    David Skinner (Director of Music)
    Samuel Kemp, Francis Fowler (Organists)


    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
  • jonfan
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 1476

    #2
    A hugely rewarding act of worship with a choir which relished the contrasts in dynamics and mood. The anthem was the true climax of the service where Leighton’s build to the end was superbly done, not only by the choir but by the organ and engineering,

    Comment

    • Pulcinella
      Host
      • Feb 2014
      • 11423

      #3
      I have a particular affection for that Leighton anthem, having introduced it to a choir I sang in as a graduate student; it was adopted into the Maundy Thursday liturgy.

      I'm sorry to say that I thought the closing voluntary to be very dull and pedestrian, almost as though it was being sightread (albeit better than I would have played it!).
      Last edited by Pulcinella; 14-03-25, 11:03. Reason: Typo

      Comment

      • Vox Humana
        Full Member
        • Dec 2012
        • 1265

        #4
        Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
        i'm sorry to say that I thought the closing voluntary to be very dull and pedestrian, almost as though it was being sightread (albeit better than I would have played it!).
        I understand what you mean, but I think you're a little hard. I thought it full of tenderness and pathos. The trouble with such a slow speed is keeping the tension and interest up right through to the end and perhaps this was not quite achieved. A very slightly faster speed would have done it, but I enjoyed the performance nonetheless.

        It's always lovely to hear the psalms of the day, especially when you can hear the words, as you could here. I was less impressed with the chants, which, coupled with the indulgent delivery, made a cheerful set of psalms sound rather downbeat.

        I have never previously enjoyed Leighton's Solus ad victimam, but this powerful and moving performance quite converted me.

        A nice service all round.

        Comment

        • Keraulophone
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 2017

          #5
          Originally posted by Vox Humana View Post
          I understand what you mean, but I think you're a little hard. I thought it full of tenderness and pathos.
          I'm with Vox H here. I thought it was an appropriately Lenten interpretation. This Fantasia lends itself to different moods. Peter Holder was unfairly criticised for playing it too slowly at the end of HM The Queen's funeral at the Abbey. Kevin Bowyer played it in a more bracing manner to cap last Sunday morning's Radio 4 service from Glasgow. Those of my vintage will probably have learnt the piece from Novello Book III (a cleverly selected introduction to JSB's organ works) which is missing the elaborate ornamentation that Bach probably meant for the pedal harpsichard. These days we usually hear the multitude of appoggiaturas, etc on the organ, and in a gentle performance as we heard from Sidney Sussex it works well. Going back to its 'different moods', 562 sounds magnificent played ff organo pleno, as the great Peter Hurford demonstrates here, a completely different experience: https://youtu.be/XqBwqwQI4qg?si=1R8pCobcRANSpXqD

          Comment

          • Pulcinella
            Host
            • Feb 2014
            • 11423

            #6
            Fair comments, VH and K; I'm clearly more of a pleno man.


            Haven't listened to the Hurford link but I see from the Decca set I have that he used the organ in Our Lady of Sorrows, Toronto, in that recording.
            Rogg, in the other full set I have, is pretty full-throated (iirc) on the Arlesheim Silbermann instrument.

            PS: Yes: it looks like that's from that Hurford set. A tad too shrill for me.
            And I suspect I was used to a pretty hefty performance from Noel Rawsthorne in Liverpool.
            Last edited by Pulcinella; 14-03-25, 11:17. Reason: PS added.

            Comment

            • Vox Humana
              Full Member
              • Dec 2012
              • 1265

              #7
              Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
              I'm clearly more of a pleno man.
              Oh, me too. It's a very powerful, intense piece and for my money needs and intense and powerful registration. I think it needs a good, solid chorus to mixture plus a good, solid 16' reed in the Pedal. I don't know this Flentrop organ, but I do wonder whether, for all its loveliness, it was perhaps a little too refined. Some of these modern German and Dutch organs lack the oomph that the organs of Bach's time had. I'm not eough of an organ nerd to know what the difference is, but it's quite subtle because a Trost or a Hildebrandt organ is in no way an English cathedral organ.

              Comment

              Working...
              X