CE Liverpool Cathedral 30th March 2011

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DracoM
    Host
    • Mar 2007
    • 13009

    CE Liverpool Cathedral 30th March 2011

    CE Liverpool Cathedral


    Order of Service:


    Introit: Evening Hymn of King Charles I (Ley)
    Responses: Leighton
    Psalms: 36, 38, 39 (Hylton Stewart, South, Barnby, Sinclair)
    Office Hymn: There's a wideness in God's mercy (Corvedale)
    First Lesson: Genesis 9: 8-17
    Canticles: The First Service (Batten)
    Second Lesson: 1 Peter 3: 18-22
    Anthem: My soul, there is a country (Parry)
    Final Hymn: I heard the voice of Jesus say (Kingsfold)

    Voluntary: Prelude and Fugue in C minor BWV546 (Bach)


    Organ Scholar: Martyn Noble
    Associate Organist: Daniel Bishop
    Director of Music: David Poulter
  • DracoM
    Host
    • Mar 2007
    • 13009

    #2
    I tried an experiment - sure everyone else has done exactly the same week after week, but..........!

    Listened live in stereo on FM, then later iPlayer. The difference is actually quite startling particular with an acoustic like Liverpool Cathedral.

    On FM, the distance, separation, rather edgy sound picture plus echo combined to make much tuning feel a bit wobbly at times, some men's voices pretty prominent, and at times the top line disappeared into the not inconsiderable open spaces. No lack of enthusiasm, nor musicianship at all. It must be a pig of a place to engineer sympathetically, particularly for live broadcast.

    However, on iPLayer, the much more compressed sound actually made the choir sound physically alive, present, much closer and well-knit, solos stood out well - particularly the boy in the canticles - while the alto did not fare anythng like as well.

    Lot of real energy and enthusiasm throughout the service, maybe tiny indiscipline in the psalms at times, but the occasional use of unison allowed each part to sing out with some relish, and the freedom and delight evinced was clear.

    The Batten canticles I didn't think worked ideally in this acoustic, very decent piece thnough it is in its own right, since it tended to exaggerat the sheer hugeness of the spaces and came over on FM at least as a bit thin as a result. But that's probably just me, and anyway, you can't keep on choosing the semi-operatic end of the repertoire because of the cathedral you direct in I do understand.

    Parry however was a great choice for that acoustic, and the choir delivered it with real swagger and fine sonority.

    On both FM and iPlayer, the very fine Bach Prelude and Fugue were a joy. How often do we EVER hear a complete pairing of Prel/Fug? ? Many thanks for that.

    Comment

    • ardcarp
      Late member
      • Nov 2010
      • 11102

      #3
      Well done Liverpool. I love the hymn, There's a Wideness in God's Mercy, sung to Coverdale. A really splendid tune. I'm so glad that the final hymn and not that one was sacrificed to time pressures. In past broadcasts the organ has (unsurprisingly) been a bit OTT, and here it was tastefully controlled...and the chamber organ in the Batten was just great.

      Comment

      • DracoM
        Host
        • Mar 2007
        • 13009

        #4
        Sorry - yes, the Batten accompaniment was delightful, wasn't it? Supportive but discreet.

        Comment

        • Bullock in D

          #5
          Is it true that the choir goes in in fours ( not on all fours ) because the place is so vast?

          Comment

          • amateur51

            #6
            Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
            Well done Liverpool. I love the hymn, There's a Wideness in God's Mercy, sung to Coverdale. A really splendid tune. I'm so glad that the final hymn and not that one was sacrificed to time pressures. In past broadcasts the organ has (unsurprisingly) been a bit OTT, and here it was tastefully controlled...and the chamber organ in the Batten was just great.
            Coverdale?

            Isn't that the milk that the cows want back?

            I'm a stranger here myself

            Comment

            • DracoM
              Host
              • Mar 2007
              • 13009

              #7
              Gosh, that ws funny.

              Comment

              • bach736
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 213

                #8
                Actually, they could have sung the final hymn and still had time to spare. You don't suppose they forgot, do you? I've done it myself.

                Comment

                • DracoM
                  Host
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 13009

                  #9
                  But that would have left them no time for the splendid Bach - that finished pretty well spot on 5 p.m.

                  Comment

                  • bach736
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 213

                    #10
                    Sorry to be pedantic, Draco, but the running time was only 57'31". I remain unconvinced.
                    I agree about the Bach, though - superbly played.
                    Last edited by bach736; 31-03-11, 05:42. Reason: summoned for tea-making duties mid post

                    Comment

                    • dj02468

                      #11
                      Some good sounds here from the choir, particularly the men; the boys diction and pitch in the psalms a little unclear. I agree about the organ balance - much better than in the past. Batten very competently sung, pity about the fluffed organ note though. Bach and the organ/building acoustic have never IMO been good bedfellows as the detail is often swamped by the echo. Not sure I agree with bach736, as there were several dubious sounds, fluffs and tempo variations - competent rather than superb. Which raises an interesting question - why wasn't Prof Tracey playing? You would normally have expected the senior player to be there, even if a less experienced player was allowed to play for some part. Has there been another upset?

                      Comment

                      • Lizzie
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 299

                        #12
                        Originally posted by dj02468 View Post
                        Some good sounds here from the choir, particularly the men; the boys diction and pitch in the psalms a little unclear. I agree about the organ balance - much better than in the past. Batten very competently sung, pity about the fluffed organ note though. Bach and the organ/building acoustic have never IMO been good bedfellows as the detail is often swamped by the echo. Not sure I agree with bach736, as there were several dubious sounds, fluffs and tempo variations - competent rather than superb. Which raises an interesting question - why wasn't Prof Tracey playing? You would normally have expected the senior player to be there, even if a less experienced player was allowed to play for some part. Has there been another upset?
                        I believe the Maestro felt it would be good to let a young player have the pleasure of some moments of glory, having played so many broadcasts for nearly 30 years. No upsets! Bws. Liz

                        Comment

                        • Lizzie
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 299

                          #13
                          Have heard many a good Bach concert played on the Lady Chapel organ though. Think Bach sounds much brighter in the Cathedral these days, since the installation of the Nave division several years ago. Perhaps one just has to be there to really hear that though. L

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20580

                            #14
                            Originally posted by DracoM View Post
                            It must be a pig of a place to engineer sympathetically, particularly for live broadcast.
                            I heard Elgar's oratorio "The Apostle" under Sir Charles Groves in Liverpool Cathedral in the early 1970s, and the echo was very destructive. The BBC recording that was broadcast later couldn't overcome this completely, but it was amazing just how much the blurring of sound was minimised. Sometimes a bit of aural cheating can be beneficial.

                            Comment

                            • Lizzie
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 299

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                              I heard Elgar's oratorio "The Apostle" under Sir Charles Groves in Liverpool Cathedral in the early 1970s, and the echo was very destructive. The BBC recording that was broadcast later couldn't overcome this completely, but it was amazing just how much the blurring of sound was minimised. Sometimes a bit of aural cheating can be beneficial.
                              I've sung Crucifixion in there many a time and it always feels as if one is singing a solo! Mind you as I sing Second Sop, and there are always larger numbers of Top G merchants, it's probably not so far from the truth! Fun though!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X