Eric Whitacre - BBC Singers - Kings Singers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hedgehog

    #16
    Well........... Whitacre is popular with amateur choirs and a cut above Rutter. I've heard a few of his pieces and I find them effective. That is where I'd place his repertoire though - with good amateur choirs, generally I'd expect other repertoire from the BBC singers. His work often appears alongside more technically challenging contemporary repertoire in concerts and works well too in that respect.

    Comment

    • Serial_Apologist
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 37851

      #17
      Originally posted by hedgehog View Post
      Well........... Whitacre is popular with amateur choirs and a cut above Rutter. I've heard a few of his pieces and I find them effective. That is where I'd place his repertoire though - with good amateur choirs, generally I'd expect other repertoire from the BBC singers. His work often appears alongside more technically challenging contemporary repertoire in concerts and works well too in that respect.
      You mean it gives you time to pop out for a wee while it's on, is I guess what you mean.

      Comment

      • hedgehog

        #18
        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
        You mean it gives you time to pop out for a wee while it's on, is I guess what you mean.
        No what I mean is that it makes it possible for good amateur choirs to present a whole programme of contemporary music - some pieces more and some less demanding for the singers.
        If you want to go out for a quick fag/drink/pee, then that makes everybody happy, no? ( Whitacre is just one of very many composers I'd put in the filler category btw)

        Comment

        • ardcarp
          Late member
          • Nov 2010
          • 11102

          #19
          OK. It was tabula rasa time for me. I relaxed and listened without preconception. EW's public manner, a bit touchy-feely but humorous, might not appeal to everyone. It clearly went down a bundle with the audience. It's easy to be sniffy about his musical language, but I find he has some original ideas which go beyond the merely repetitive stuff of the minimalists.

          For me the first half of the programme was the best. Leonardo Dreams of his FM, Alone and The Stolen Child were sensitively done by the BBCS and the Kings Singers. Indeed EW obviously has a choral-training knack and elicited some quiet passages from the Beebs. This was lost a bit in the second half I felt, where the music (IMHO) was also generally naffer.

          Love him or hate him, I think EW is a bit of a phenomenon...and if anyone else wants to dip a toe in the water, try the very first piece. It paid a sort of homage to Italian madrigalists...even if Leonardo pre-dated them a bit.

          Comment

          • Gabriel Jackson
            Full Member
            • May 2011
            • 686

            #20
            Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
            OK. It was tabula rasa time for me. I relaxed and listened without preconception. EW's public manner, a bit touchy-feely but humorous, might not appeal to everyone. It clearly went down a bundle with the audience. It's easy to be sniffy about his musical language, but I find he has some original ideas which go beyond the merely repetitive stuff of the minimalists.

            For me the first half of the programme was the best. Leonardo Dreams of his FM, Alone and The Stolen Child were sensitively done by the BBCS and the Kings Singers. Indeed EW obviously has a choral-training knack and elicited some quiet passages from the Beebs. This was lost a bit in the second half I felt, where the music (IMHO) was also generally naffer.

            Love him or hate him, I think EW is a bit of a phenomenon...and if anyone else wants to dip a toe in the water, try the very first piece. It paid a sort of homage to Italian madrigalists...even if Leonardo pre-dated them a bit.
            Eric is a nice guy, a generous and supportive colleague to many, and has a unique ability to inspire and enthuse people. He has played a huge role in popularising the choral medium and attracting new listeners (and practioners). It is easy (and cheap) to sneer at him but, like John Rutter in his different way, he has done an enormous amount for choral music, and choral singing.

            Comment

            • underthecountertenor
              Full Member
              • Apr 2011
              • 1586

              #21
              Originally posted by hedgehog View Post
              Well........... Whitacre is popular with amateur choirs and a cut above Rutter. I've heard a few of his pieces and I find them effective. That is where I'd place his repertoire though - with good amateur choirs, generally I'd expect other repertoire from the BBC singers. His work often appears alongside more technically challenging contemporary repertoire in concerts and works well too in that respect.
              Why is he a cut above Rutter, rather than just being very different from him?

              Comment

              • hedgehog

                #22
                Originally posted by underthecountertenor View Post
                Why is he a cut above Rutter, rather than just being very different from him?
                Ah, sorry I should have added imo. Personally I find Whitacre's music a little more imaginative. A piece like Cloudburst for instance is extremely well done, a journey in sound - not new as such, but still very fresh to the ear, not caught up in or alluding to a tradition ( I know, that sounds like a contradiction, but it isn't - like a salad, the mix may not be new but you know if it's fresh or not ).

                Comment

                • Black Swan

                  #23
                  I totally agree that he has helped Choral music immensely. However, for me I don't like his music. But others do and I am happy for them.

                  Comment

                  • Roehre

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Black Swan View Post
                    I totally agree that he has helped Choral music immensely. However, for me I don't like his music. But others do and I am happy for them.
                    That makes two of us

                    Comment

                    • ardcarp
                      Late member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 11102

                      #25
                      Talking of Cloudburst reminds me of....

                      <p>At the age of only 35, Eric Whitacre has already gained a reputation in the United States that many composers strive for a lifetime to achieve. The <i>American Record Guide</i> named his first recording one of the top ten classical albums in 1997, and the <i>Los Angeles Times</i> described his music as having ‘electric, chilling harmonies; works of unearthly beauty and imagination’. His <i>Water Night</i> (included on this new recording) has become one of the most popular choral works of the last decade, and is one of the top-selling choral publications of all time.</p> <p>Whitacre’s published works have sold well over 350,000 copies worldwide. This is clearly a composer to watch, and if his phenomenal Stateside success is anything to go by, his emergence into the British music scene should be revelatory.</p> <p>And who better to represent an innovative young choral composer than Stephen Layton and Polyphony, award-winning exponents of twentieth-century choral music? Their account of Britten’s <hyperion:link album="CDA67140"><i>Sacred and Profane</i></hyperion:link> garnered the group a <i>Gramophone</i> Award and a Diapason d’Or in 2001, in 2002 a <i>Gramophone</i> Award nomination followed for the choir’s <hyperion:link album="CDA67330">Walton</hyperion:link> CD, and at the 2004 <i>Gramophone</i> Awards Polyphony’s recording of works by Arvo Pärt, <hyperion:link album="CDA67375"><i>Triodion</i></hyperion:link>, was voted Best of Category in the Choral division.</p> <p>Under Layton’s directorship, Polyphony handles Whitacre’s evocative and soulful music with consummate artistry; from the quiet intensity of <i>Sleep</i> to the breathtaking exuberance of <i>With a lily in your hand</i>, by way of the tender innocence of <i>This Marriage</i> (one of three premiere recordings on the disc), this new recording is a stunning showcase both for an up-and-coming young composer and also for the awesome talents of one of the UK’s leading choirs.</p>


                      ... a CD of Whitacre's choral music, entitled Cloudburst performed superbly by Polyphony. There was some controversy a little while ago when [if my memory serves me correctly] Whitacre presented an edition of The Choir and implied that his recently formed Eric Whitacre Singers were the best in the universe at performing his music. It struck many at the time as being a teeny bit boastful. Many (not least members of Polyphony) also thought it untrue!

                      Comment

                      • Ian
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 358

                        #26
                        The planet of choral music seems to exist in a parallel universe to, pretty much, the rest of ‘classical’ music: Last week I spent an enjoyable day attending some end of year ‘recitals’ given by the post-graduate choral conducting students at the RWCMD. In all I heard seventeen pieces and all but six were by living composers. So natural and normal this seemed, it didn’t immediately occur to me how different this was from your average orchestral (etc.) season where you would be lucky to find more than a couple of new pieces in an entire season.

                        Comment

                        • ardcarp
                          Late member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 11102

                          #27
                          What an interesting experience. Give us an idea of the composers, Ian.

                          Comment

                          • Ian
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 358

                            #28
                            Purcell,
                            Britten,
                            Rist (b. 1988)
                            MacMillan
                            Camilleri (d. 2003)
                            Portelli (b. 1973)
                            Gasparini (18c)
                            Muscat (b.1977)
                            Elgar
                            Aguiar (b. 1949)
                            Stroope (b. 1953)
                            Budi Susanoto Yohanes (b. 1979)
                            Ireland
                            Chilcott
                            Ola Gjeilo

                            Comment

                            • ardcarp
                              Late member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 11102

                              #29
                              Thanks, Ian! What was the format...every student bringing his/her own group of singers, or a fixed choir upon which they all worked. Were there some clearly outstanding budding choral directors??

                              Comment

                              • Ian
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 358

                                #30
                                Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
                                Thanks, Ian! What was the format...every student bringing his/her own group of singers, or a fixed choir upon which they all worked. Were there some clearly outstanding budding choral directors??
                                A pool of singers, mainly undergrads, but also including the conductors themselves when not actually conducting. They were all excellent.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X