Originally posted by silvestrione
View Post
Bruckner
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View PostReally off-thread now, but Terry Eagleton's new book, Critical Revolutionaries, has a pretty good go at restating the rationale for it....
Comment
-
-
Download of the month from a.bruckner.com: https://www.abruckner.com/downloads/...3wNUxMrAHqECGU
i.e. a FLAC of the excellent Sinfonica of Lonon/Wyn Morris Helgoland. With Windows, just right-click on the download link and "Save link as ...".
Comment
-
-
For anyone there who fancies trips across the Channel for an Anton Bruckner symphony cycle, the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra has you in mind, for a cycle scheduled over the next two seasons:
No. 3: 17 December 2023 (Ivan Fischer)
No. 7: 19 January 2024 (Myung-whun Chung)
No. 5: 2 May 2024 (Klaus Mäkelä)
No. 8: 20 June 2024 (Christian Thielemann)
No. 2: 27 September 2024 (Andrew Manze)
No. 4: 3 October 2024 (Daniel Harding)
No. 1: 8 December 2024 (Vladimir Jurowski)
No. 6: 17 January 2025 (Simone Young)
No. 9: 6 February 2025 (Riccardo Chailly) (*)
(*) For No. 9, "in voltooide vorm" translates as "in completed form". Guess we'll learn later which completion that Chailly will use.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostAnyone wondering which edition of Bruckner's 8th was broadcast on TtN last night, it was the Haas. Not mentioned in the listing or the on-air (or online) presentation, of course.Pacta sunt servanda !!!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flay View Post
Sadly I thought it a lugubrious, plodding performance. Is the Haas the version the one most frequently performed (forgive my ignorance)?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by CallMePaul View Post
The Haas version includes several bars cut by Bruckner. Haas thought that the cuts were made under duress, but his edition does not represent any performance of the symphony during the composer's lifetime. It is considered by many to be "musicologically incorrect" (my phrase) but many conductors, including Haitink, Wand, Karajan and Thielmann, have preferred it to the Nowak edition published in the 1950s. Haas's membership of the NSDAP meant that he lost his official positions after World War 2 and his Bruckner work was continued and replaced under Nowak's direction.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bluestateprommer View PostFor anyone there who fancies trips across the Channel for an Anton Bruckner symphony cycle, the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra has you in mind, for a cycle scheduled over the next two seasons:
No. 3: 17 December 2023 (Ivan Fischer)
No. 7: 19 January 2024 (Myung-whun Chung)
No. 5: 2 May 2024 (Klaus Mäkelä)
No. 8: 20 June 2024 (Christian Thielemann)
No. 2: 27 September 2024 (Andrew Manze)
No. 4: 3 October 2024 (Daniel Harding)
No. 1: 8 December 2024 (Vladimir Jurowski)
No. 6: 17 January 2025 (Simone Young)
No. 9: 6 February 2025 (Riccardo Chailly) (*)
(*) For No. 9, "in voltooide vorm" translates as "in completed form". Guess we'll learn later which completion that Chailly will use.
Comment
-
-
Received the Naxos Newsletter email today which included mention of Bruckner Symphonies and like M&S food - not just any Bruckner Symphonies but Hansjorg Albrecht’s organ transcriptions of the complete shmphonies - I think I Imight sample a few movements but Can’t imagine anything but a fair amount of tedium will abound should I attempt to trawl through the set. Is this intlerent of me or a sensible view?
what do you organ scholars and Bruckner fans think?Last edited by cloughie; 18-12-24, 08:49.
Comment
-
-
I don't care for arrangements generally, where we have adequate recordings of the original. In some cases they have historic interest in their own right, for instance the chamber ensemble versions made for Schoenberg's Verein fur musikalische Privatauffuhrungen or Elgar's rescored and abridged versions of his works he made for early acoustic recordings . And sometimes a piano transcription can bring out detail, as in Percy Grainger's two-piano version of Song of the High Hills.
But I don't think I'd listen much if at all to organ arrangements of orchestral works . The organ repertoire is wonderfully rich enough without playing non-organ works. I do recall an old friend who use to play the '48' on the organ. Some of them work very well (e.g. the Csharp minor in Book One).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostReceived the Naxos Newsletter email today which included mention of Bruckner Symphonies and like M&S food - not just any Bruckner Symphonies but Hansjorg Albrecht’s organ transcriptions of the complete shmphonies - I think I Imight sample a few movements but Can’t imagine anything but a fair amount of tedium will abound should I attempt to trawl through the set. Is this intlerent of me or a sensible view?
what do you organ scholars and Bruckner fans think?
Bruckner was an organist but never composed any music for his instrument. All of his symphonies were written for the orchestra and just because he was an organist is, imo, a poor excuse for transcribing them for the organ. If he'd wished them to be heard that way he'd have written them for the organ in the first place!
Once again, poor Bruckner. The things he has to put up with!"The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
A few years ago, after reading Herrin des Hügels, a biography of Cosima Wagner by Oliver Hilmes, I commented in a thread about Liszt on the circumstances of his funeral, which was a half-hearted affair, his daughter being preoccupied with the Bayreuth Festival. Bruckner was on hand to play the organ. When some of Liszt's students asked him why he hadn't played something by the deceased composer he said he didn't know anything, so had improvised on Parsifal. It was high summer and Felix Mottl reported that at the post-funeral evening party thrown by Cosima in Wahnfried, the smell of the dead Liszt still lingered in the hallway.
Comment
-
Comment