Anton Bruckner Symphony Nº 0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hornspieler
    Late Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 1847

    Anton Bruckner Symphony Nº 0

    I've just been listening to the recording of this work by The Amsterdam Concervatoire under Bernard Haitinck.

    What a delightful work! Does anyone else know it?

    This record was given to me 15 years ago and I cannot remember ever listening to it.

    Wonderful playing by the orchestra - especially the strings.

    None of your Brucknerian gloom and repetetive scherzos - just a bit (in fact a lot) of fun.

    HS
  • antongould
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 8782

    #2
    You are in good company HS it was the only Bruckner symphony salymap had any time for - IIRC she claimed it had been used, uncredited, in a Hitchcock film ....

    Comment

    • Stanfordian
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 9310

      #3
      Originally posted by Hornspieler View Post
      I've just been listening to the recording of this work by The Amsterdam Concervatoire under Bernard Haitinck.

      What a delightful work! Does anyone else know it?

      This record was given to me 15 years ago and I cannot remember ever listening to it.

      Wonderful playing by the orchestra - especially the strings.

      None of your Brucknerian gloom and repetetive scherzos - just a bit (in fact a lot) of fun.

      HS
      Hiya Hornspieler,

      I think the recent recording by the Philharmonie Festiva/Gerd Schaller on Profil is excellent. It's reviewed on musicweb.

      Comment

      • Petrushka
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 12247

        #4
        I think I know my Bruckner but the Symphony No 0 is one that I've hardly ever heard. I borrowed the Concertgebouw/Haitink LP from the library way back in the early 1970s and the only recording on my shelves is Chicago SO/Solti and I've not played that for many a year.

        Perhaps JLW and PG Tipps would let us have their thoughts on this work.
        "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

        Comment

        • visualnickmos
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 3610

          #5
          Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
          I think I know my Bruckner but the Symphony No 0 is one that I've hardly ever heard. I borrowed the Concertgebouw/Haitink LP from the library way back in the early 1970s and the only recording on my shelves is Chicago SO/Solti and I've not played that for many a year.

          Perhaps JLW and PG Tipps would let us have their thoughts on this work.
          Spooky! - I played the very same recording a few hours ago! Loved it Clocking in at 38 minutes, must be Bruckner's shortest composition...?

          Comment

          • Richard Barrett
            Guest
            • Jan 2016
            • 6259

            #6
            Nothing with Bruckner is ever simple of course - no.0 was actually written after no.1, but withdrawn by Bruckner and not published or performed until long after his death. Recordingwise, in my opinion nothing comes near the Venzago.

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              #7
              Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
              Spooky! - I played the very same recording a few hours ago! Loved it Clocking in at 38 minutes, must be Bruckner's shortest composition...?
              Most performances of Die Nullte are over 40mins, visnick - and some close to 45. The "Study Symphony" (The "00") is the shortest of the Symphonies - there are plenty of his choral works that are much shorter.
              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              • jayne lee wilson
                Banned
                • Jul 2011
                • 10711

                #8
                When the Venzago release of the noughtth appeared, c/w No.1 (with that gorgeous yellow & green abstract impasto cover design... I often take it out just to gaze upon the marvel, as worthy of contemplation as Charles Tomlinson's apothecary's jar) I thought - surely, this time....
                ...but no. It was still the musical disappointment it has always been. Despite the date of its composition, it sounds like another study symphony, a 'prentice-piece, pre-Bruckner, as if self-consciously working through its own stylistic quirks. For me it's utterly overshadowed by the brilliance, originality and endlessly inventive energy of Symphony No.1 - a work which seems to say "HERE I AM!" announcing the true symphonic arrival (poignantly so in the light of subsequent misguided editorial influence and interference) of a bold and confident creator.
                Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 19-03-16, 04:02.

                Comment

                • Eine Alpensinfonie
                  Host
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 20570

                  #9
                  Of course it's really no. 2 . . .

                  Comment

                  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                    Gone fishin'
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 30163

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                    Of course it's really no. 2 . . .
                    No 3, really? As Richard Barrett pointed out, it was written after the c minor "First" Symphony, but the "Study" Symphony, (number "00") was the first "First".
                    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      #11
                      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                      ... the first "First".
                      ... so, perhaps - rather than "double zero", it should be referred to as "double First" (which is quite good for a "Student Symphony") except that in print that might look like "no 11". And that's the Ninth.

                      I greatly enjoy the "Nullte" - I think it works better when conductors don't give the impression that they're trying to turn it into a later work (imposing the aesthetics of, say, the Sixth or Seventh onto it) but let it speak in its own gentler, more easy-going terms. Skrowaczewski has the measure of it (on OEHMS with the Saarbruckners ).

                      I'm recently coming increasingly to the opinion that, "post-Karajan", the later Symphonies also get stronger with a "lighter", fleeter, more athletic approach to the reading, too.
                      Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 18-03-16, 09:32.
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #12
                        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                        Most performances of Die Nullte are over 40mins, visnick - and some close to 45. The "Study Symphony" (The "00") is the shortest of the Symphonies - there are plenty of his choral works that are much shorter.
                        I really should check for couplings when comparing Total Timings on the backs of CDs

                        You're absolutely right, of course, visnick - at around 36/37mins, the "0" is, with the "00" the shortest of Bruckner's Symphonies.
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • visualnickmos
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 3610

                          #13
                          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                          I really should check for couplings when comparing Total Timings on the backs of CDs

                          You're absolutely right, of course, visnick - at around 36/37mins, the "0" is, with the "00" the shortest of Bruckner's Symphonies.
                          As I am still familiarising myself with Bruckner's symphonies, I hadn't realised that Solti (perhaps unsurprisingly) takes it at quite a lick. However it 'sounded fine' to my untrained ears! I certainly didn't know Bruckner wrote a '00' as well! Interesting thread, this is turning out to be - thanks to those whose knowledge of Bruckner (you, for example) is far, far greater than mine....

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            #14
                            Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
                            I certainly didn't know Bruckner wrote a '00' as well!
                            It doesn't really sound "Brucknerian" - some lovely moments, and the Slow Movement is gorgeous. Stan the Man again does it full justice:

                            You've got to love a composer so humble that he called his first symphony the double zero. But that doesn't mean you've got to love the double zero. Because ...


                            No need for the <sadface>, by the way - hearing a repertoire like this for the first time is an enviable situation
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • visualnickmos
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 3610

                              #15
                              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                              ... hearing a repertoire like this for the first time is an enviable situation
                              That's a very good and positive way of looking at it - I'll drink to that, too

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X