Originally posted by bluestateprommer
View Post
Britten
Collapse
X
-
Good Morning Britten, a blog about you-know-who, was founded in 2013 and still survives albeit in a dormant form.
In the words of its author, Ben Hogwood, "Good Morning Britten is intended to be a year-long blog that looks to examine all the works of Benjamin Britten in this, the centenary year of his birth."
I hope the members of FOR3, hardy souls that they are, enjoy Mr Hogwood's company as they explore the windswept fens and brackish creeks of Britten's oeuvre.
(My apologies if the blog has been mentioned before.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Hitch View PostGood Morning Britten, a blog about you-know-who, was founded in 2013 and still survives albeit in a dormant form.
In the words of its author, Ben Hogwood, "Good Morning Britten is intended to be a year-long blog that looks to examine all the works of Benjamin Britten in this, the centenary year of his birth."
I hope the members of FOR3, hardy souls that they are, enjoy Mr Hogwood's company as they explore the windswept fens and brackish creeks of Britten's oeuvre.
(My apologies if the blog has been mentioned before.)
Comment
-
-
Looking through this long thread my eye was caught by a 2014 post from the much-missed Mary Chambers, who actually knew Britten, that she felt 'something unpleasant' about Paul Kildea's biography. I wouldn't say 'unpleasant' but I was troubled by his many claims left unsupported by evidence or references; for instance that Frank Bridge was a better conductor than Adrian Boult, or that Alma Mahler asked both Britten and Shostakovitch (separately) to complete her late husband's Tenth Symphony. All too often he endorses Britten's opinions without attempting to justify them .
It reminded me of the time, during Britten's lifetime, when it was impossible to find an impartial view of his music: the efforts of the pro-Brittenites and anti-Brittenites seemed to goad each other to ever wilder claims. For me he was neither a clever, over-privileged show-off, nor 'Britain's greatest composer' but the often uneven author of some wonderful and memorable music .
I was prompted to post this after hearing 'Death in Venice' this morning. I haven't heard it often since hearing the premiere, which impressed me c.50 years ago. I'd be interested to hear what others think of Britten's music today.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostLooking through this long thread my eye was caught by a 2014 post from the much-missed Mary Chambers, who actually knew Britten, that she felt 'something unpleasant' about Paul Kildea's biography. I wouldn't say 'unpleasant' but I was troubled by his many claims left unsupported by evidence or references; for instance that Frank Bridge was a better conductor than Adrian Boult, or that Alma Mahler asked both Britten and Shostakovitch (separately) to complete her late husband's Tenth Symphony. All too often he endorses Britten's opinions without attempting to justify them .
It reminded me of the time, during Britten's lifetime, when it was impossible to find an impartial view of his music: the efforts of the pro-Brittenites and anti-Brittenites seemed to goad each other to ever wilder claims. For me he was neither a clever, over-privileged show-off, nor 'Britain's greatest composer' but the often uneven author of some wonderful and memorable music .
I was prompted to post this after hearing 'Death in Venice' this morning. I haven't heard it often since hearing the premiere, which impressed me c.50 years ago. I'd be interested to hear what others think of Britten's music today.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostMy thoughts about Britten too. I tend to prefer the early works (up to and including "Grimes"), notwithstanding the frequent obviousness of the influences on display in them, to the later ones. I've often felt that he strained in his aim to demonstrate his "modernity", being more naturally inclined to straightforward unaffectedness, as in "A Boy Was Born", than in some later works in which dissonance comes across as forced and difficult to account for in contextual musical terms rather than a wish to come across as up to date. As with Liszt a case of ambition coupled with inconsistent inspiration exerted on more naturally gifted younger figures. I happen to feel the same about Tippett too - feeling his best work to have been up to and including the "Midsummer Marriage". But there we go, and I know a lot of people on the forum I usually concur with will strongly disagree with me on one or other of these two counts.Last edited by Lordgeous; 06-09-22, 16:48.
Comment
-
-
On June 23 someone reminded me it was Britten’s birthday, so I listened to this early recording of the Donne settings by Pears
Benjamin BrittenThe Holy Sonnets of John Donne op.35Oh my blacke Soule ! 0:00Batter my heart 3:19Oh might those sighes and teares 4:33Oh, to vex me 7:37What ...
In fact I was so impressed by the music that I resolved to explore his songs more. Those Donne settings sounded so modern, as modern as songs by Rihm!
This little project led me to Ian Partridge and Jukka Savijoki’s recording of Songs from the Chinese, which I love.
But then it almost ground to a halt, I found more recent performances on record of those two cycles, or indeed other Britten songs, less engaging. That’s no reflection on the music or the performances, of course. Two slight possible exceptions were Alexander Young singing the Donne and a few Chinese settings on an interesting compilation recording by Scot Weir called Letters - Weir’s voice reminds me of a friend’s, and the recording has some wonderful settings of composers’ letters by someone I’d never even heard of before called Dominick Argento.
Prior to that, a couple of years ago, someone “made me” watch a German production of Death in Venice, a production which very much played up the homoerotic aspect. It was so painful - for personal reasons. I had maybe seen this opera twice before, and on both those occasions I could slightly identify with Tadzio. But no more! Now I am more empathetic towards Aschenbach! The horror, the horror. Never again. Bring me the whisky bottle, now!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostLooking through this long thread my eye was caught by a 2014 post from the much-missed Mary Chambers, who actually knew Britten, that she felt 'something unpleasant' about Paul Kildea's biography. I wouldn't say 'unpleasant' but I was troubled by his many claims left unsupported by evidence or references; for instance that Frank Bridge was a better conductor than Adrian Boult, or that Alma Mahler asked both Britten and Shostakovitch (separately) to complete her late husband's Tenth Symphony. All too often he endorses Britten's opinions without attempting to justify them .
It reminded me of the time, during Britten's lifetime, when it was impossible to find an impartial view of his music: the efforts of the pro-Brittenites and anti-Brittenites seemed to goad each other to ever wilder claims. For me he was neither a clever, over-privileged show-off, nor 'Britain's greatest composer' but the often uneven author of some wonderful and memorable music .
I was prompted to post this after hearing 'Death in Venice' this morning. I haven't heard it often since hearing the premiere, which impressed me c.50 years ago. I'd be interested to hear what others think of Britten's music today.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mandryka View PostOn June 23 someone reminded me it was Britten’s birthday, so I listened to this early recording of the Donne settings by Pears
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by crb11 View PostI'm not sure where they got that from, as he was born on November 22 - the feast day of St Cecilia, the patron saint of music, something Britten commented on. But, as Ein Heldenleben comments, he's one of the greatest British composers, so worth exploring at any time of year.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostI don’t think he wrote a single opera that was less than excellent - Grimes, Budd, MSND, Turn of the Screw are masterpieces . The Requiem was of its time and hasn’t worn well - ditto some of the occasional pieces but not Gloriana - so nearly another masterwork. The Songs - in particular the Canticles - masterpieces again , ditto the String Quartets, virtually all the pieces for voice and orchestra. Probably our greatest composer after Elgar and without question our greatest vocal composer. In short I’m a fan…
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostBritten seems to be a good composer to revisit. I hadn't listened to him much for years whn I heard, oddly, the two pieces for two pianos, in the old Decca recording with BB and Clifford Curzon. I was so impressed that set me off rediscovering his music.
https://youtu.be/pRfLbGt1-iU
Comment
-
Comment