Originally posted by LMcD
View Post
Parry, C. H. H. (1848-1918)
Collapse
X
-
-
-
I wonder if anyone knows Parry's Pied Piper of Hamelin? It is scored for orchestra, SATB choir plus tenor and bass soloists. I think Parry intended it to be 'for children' but not by children. I found this online, which does not distinguish itself chorally.
This is "DCS: Parry – Pied Piper" by Andrew Lang on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them.
Perhaps not a great work anyway, but indicative of Parry's instinct to interest young people in music.
Why is it that I can never remember that the 'Composers' section of the Forum is arranged alphabetically and not chronologically?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostMe too. I thought there was a lot of rhetoric about "Englishness" without defining what it was - particularly with regards to the 5th symphony - which hopefully COTW will go towards correcting, though on general evidence I'm not holding my breff. Also, it was amusing someone of the hyper-conservative ilk of Simon Heffer by implication recommending what he described as the revolutionary aspects of Parry's music - a case, as so often, of revolution being OK at sufficient distance. Dear me - what would the Hefferlump's political forbears have said?
Comment
-
-
I thought COTW gave a much better portrait of Parry than the Heffer prog. I can't pretend to have the knowledge that others on this strand have of his work. He clearly had great melodic gifts but some of it does seem a bit ploddingly worked through e.g. the very beautiful slow movt of the 2nd symphony played today - what would his hero Brahms have made of the same material? Still it is enough to be able to create beauty surely ? I wonder he'd gone to France / Germany he might have developed more as a composer? Finally for all his idiosyncrasies good to hear Robert Tear in that lovely setting of the Keat's sonnet .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostI wonder if anyone knows Parry's Pied Piper of Hamelin? It is scored for orchestra, SATB choir plus tenor and bass soloists. I think Parry intended it to be 'for children' but not by children. I found this online, which does not distinguish itself chorally.
This is "DCS: Parry – Pied Piper" by Andrew Lang on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them.
Perhaps not a great work anyway, but indicative of Parry's instinct to interest young people in music.
Why is it that I can never remember that the 'Composers' section of the Forum is arranged alphabetically and not chronologically?
Comment
-
-
I've always loved Parry's music, and am greatly looking forward to his being next Composer of the Week on the Third. Incidentally, a good friend of mine had a grandmother who had been in service to the Parrys at Highnam Court, so we all went down to Gloucestershire for a sort of nostalgia trip, to see the grounds and the House. And of course, he had a town house in London, just off High Street Kensington, which was not very far from the Royal Albert Hall
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostMe too. I thought there was a lot of rhetoric about "Englishness" without defining what it was...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hmvman View PostI seem to remember there was a TV programme on Parry a few years back with the Prince of Wales and Professor Jeremy Dibble (who appears to be the 'go to' expert on the composer.) I recall that HRH seemed obsessed with the "Englishness" of the music, again with no firm definition of it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostI thought COTW gave a much better portrait of Parry than the Heffer prog. I can't pretend to have the knowledge that others on this strand have of his work. He clearly had great melodic gifts but some of it does seem a bit ploddingly worked through e.g. the very beautiful slow movt of the 2nd symphony played today - what would his hero Brahms have made of the same material? Still it is enough to be able to create beauty surely ? I wonder he'd gone to France / Germany he might have developed more as a composer? Finally for all his idiosyncrasies good to hear Robert Tear in that lovely setting of the Keat's sonnet .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View Postthe very beautiful slow movt of the 2nd symphony played todayOriginally posted by antongould View PostRoehre, late of this parish, thought very, very highly of the slow movement of the 2nd symphony and I personally love the whole work .......
(EDIT: yes, it was (just checked on the i-Player) )Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 08-10-18, 22:57.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hmvman View PostI seem to remember there was a TV programme on Parry a few years back with the Prince of Wales and Professor Jeremy Dibble (who appears to be the 'go to' expert on the composer.) I recall that HRH seemed obsessed with the "Englishness" of the music, again with no firm definition of it.
(No mention of Prof Dibble in the list of Credits, though.)[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostBut wasn't it the slow movement of the first Symphony that was played today?
(EDIT: yes, it was (just checked on the i-Player) )
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostBut wasn't it the slow movement of the first Symphony that was played today?
(EDIT: yes, it was (just checked on the i-Player) )
Comment
-
Comment