Parry, C. H. H. (1848-1918)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Serial_Apologist
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 37628

    #31
    Originally posted by LMcD View Post
    I would have liked Simon Heffer's programme to deal at greater length with Parry's compositions, rather than concentrating quite as much on his achievements, considerable though they clearly were, as a teacher and administrator. He did the symphonies no favours by stating that No. 5 was the first, and only, one not to sound German.
    Me too. I thought there was a lot of rhetoric about "Englishness" without defining what it was - particularly with regards to the 5th symphony - which hopefully COTW will go towards correcting, though on general evidence I'm not holding my breff. Also, it was amusing someone of the hyper-conservative ilk of Simon Heffer by implication recommending what he described as the revolutionary aspects of Parry's music - a case, as so often, of revolution being OK at sufficient distance. Dear me - what would the Hefferlump's political forbears have said?

    Comment

    • ardcarp
      Late member
      • Nov 2010
      • 11102

      #32
      I wonder if anyone knows Parry's Pied Piper of Hamelin? It is scored for orchestra, SATB choir plus tenor and bass soloists. I think Parry intended it to be 'for children' but not by children. I found this online, which does not distinguish itself chorally.

      This is "DCS: Parry – Pied Piper" by Andrew Lang on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them.


      Perhaps not a great work anyway, but indicative of Parry's instinct to interest young people in music.

      Why is it that I can never remember that the 'Composers' section of the Forum is arranged alphabetically and not chronologically?

      Comment

      • Ein Heldenleben
        Full Member
        • Apr 2014
        • 6761

        #33
        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
        Me too. I thought there was a lot of rhetoric about "Englishness" without defining what it was - particularly with regards to the 5th symphony - which hopefully COTW will go towards correcting, though on general evidence I'm not holding my breff. Also, it was amusing someone of the hyper-conservative ilk of Simon Heffer by implication recommending what he described as the revolutionary aspects of Parry's music - a case, as so often, of revolution being OK at sufficient distance. Dear me - what would the Hefferlump's political forbears have said?
        And the programme rather missed the visionary and subversive side of Blake's Jerusalem . It is very far , as Parry instinctively grasped , from being a patriotic hymn.

        Comment

        • Ein Heldenleben
          Full Member
          • Apr 2014
          • 6761

          #34
          I thought COTW gave a much better portrait of Parry than the Heffer prog. I can't pretend to have the knowledge that others on this strand have of his work. He clearly had great melodic gifts but some of it does seem a bit ploddingly worked through e.g. the very beautiful slow movt of the 2nd symphony played today - what would his hero Brahms have made of the same material? Still it is enough to be able to create beauty surely ? I wonder he'd gone to France / Germany he might have developed more as a composer? Finally for all his idiosyncrasies good to hear Robert Tear in that lovely setting of the Keat's sonnet .

          Comment

          • Suffolkcoastal
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 3290

            #35
            Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
            I wonder if anyone knows Parry's Pied Piper of Hamelin? It is scored for orchestra, SATB choir plus tenor and bass soloists. I think Parry intended it to be 'for children' but not by children. I found this online, which does not distinguish itself chorally.

            This is "DCS: Parry – Pied Piper" by Andrew Lang on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them.


            Perhaps not a great work anyway, but indicative of Parry's instinct to interest young people in music.

            Why is it that I can never remember that the 'Composers' section of the Forum is arranged alphabetically and not chronologically?
            Yes, I know it and have a vocal score of the work, composed around 1905 I think.

            Comment

            • frankbridge
              Full Member
              • Sep 2018
              • 112

              #36
              I've always loved Parry's music, and am greatly looking forward to his being next Composer of the Week on the Third. Incidentally, a good friend of mine had a grandmother who had been in service to the Parrys at Highnam Court, so we all went down to Gloucestershire for a sort of nostalgia trip, to see the grounds and the House. And of course, he had a town house in London, just off High Street Kensington, which was not very far from the Royal Albert Hall

              Comment

              • hmvman
                Full Member
                • Mar 2007
                • 1099

                #37
                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                Me too. I thought there was a lot of rhetoric about "Englishness" without defining what it was...
                I seem to remember there was a TV programme on Parry a few years back with the Prince of Wales and Professor Jeremy Dibble (who appears to be the 'go to' expert on the composer.) I recall that HRH seemed obsessed with the "Englishness" of the music, again with no firm definition of it.

                Comment

                • Serial_Apologist
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 37628

                  #38
                  Originally posted by hmvman View Post
                  I seem to remember there was a TV programme on Parry a few years back with the Prince of Wales and Professor Jeremy Dibble (who appears to be the 'go to' expert on the composer.) I recall that HRH seemed obsessed with the "Englishness" of the music, again with no firm definition of it.
                  No carbuncles in it?

                  Comment

                  • antongould
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 8781

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Heldenleben View Post
                    I thought COTW gave a much better portrait of Parry than the Heffer prog. I can't pretend to have the knowledge that others on this strand have of his work. He clearly had great melodic gifts but some of it does seem a bit ploddingly worked through e.g. the very beautiful slow movt of the 2nd symphony played today - what would his hero Brahms have made of the same material? Still it is enough to be able to create beauty surely ? I wonder he'd gone to France / Germany he might have developed more as a composer? Finally for all his idiosyncrasies good to hear Robert Tear in that lovely setting of the Keat's sonnet .
                    Roehre, late of this parish, thought very, very highly of the slow movement of the 2nd symphony and I personally love the whole work .......

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Heldenleben View Post
                      the very beautiful slow movt of the 2nd symphony played today
                      Originally posted by antongould View Post
                      Roehre, late of this parish, thought very, very highly of the slow movement of the 2nd symphony and I personally love the whole work .......
                      But wasn't it the slow movement of the first Symphony that was played today?

                      (EDIT: yes, it was (just checked on the i-Player) )
                      Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 08-10-18, 22:57.
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #41
                        Originally posted by hmvman View Post
                        I seem to remember there was a TV programme on Parry a few years back with the Prince of Wales and Professor Jeremy Dibble (who appears to be the 'go to' expert on the composer.) I recall that HRH seemed obsessed with the "Englishness" of the music, again with no firm definition of it.


                        (No mention of Prof Dibble in the list of Credits, though.)
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • LMcD
                          Full Member
                          • Sep 2017
                          • 8424

                          #42
                          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                          But wasn't it the slow movement of the first Symphony that was played today?

                          (EDIT: yes, it was (just checked on the i-Player) )
                          Donald Macleod did say that all 5 symphonies would be featured, in chronological order, throughout the week.

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            #43
                            Originally posted by LMcD View Post
                            Donald Macleod did say that all 5 symphonies would be featured, in chronological order, throughout the week.
                            - and it looks as if we're getting the entire Second Symphony today.
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • BBMmk2
                              Late Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 20908

                              #44
                              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                              - and it looks as if we're getting the entire Second Symphony today.
                              I wish that the general media could programme composers music without their Anniversary being a reason.
                              Don’t cry for me
                              I go where music was born

                              J S Bach 1685-1750

                              Comment

                              • Ein Heldenleben
                                Full Member
                                • Apr 2014
                                • 6761

                                #45
                                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                                But wasn't it the slow movement of the first Symphony that was played today?

                                (EDIT: yes, it was (just checked on the i-Player) )
                                Thanks for the correction . Listening on the M5 on afour hour journey to London Donald's impeccable enunciation was lost in the road roar . Parry's immaculate orchestration cut through though....

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X