If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I would have liked Simon Heffer's programme to deal at greater length with Parry's compositions, rather than concentrating quite as much on his achievements, considerable though they clearly were, as a teacher and administrator. He did the symphonies no favours by stating that No. 5 was the first, and only, one not to sound German.
Me too. I thought there was a lot of rhetoric about "Englishness" without defining what it was - particularly with regards to the 5th symphony - which hopefully COTW will go towards correcting, though on general evidence I'm not holding my breff. Also, it was amusing someone of the hyper-conservative ilk of Simon Heffer by implication recommending what he described as the revolutionary aspects of Parry's music - a case, as so often, of revolution being OK at sufficient distance. Dear me - what would the Hefferlump's political forbears have said?
I wonder if anyone knows Parry's Pied Piper of Hamelin? It is scored for orchestra, SATB choir plus tenor and bass soloists. I think Parry intended it to be 'for children' but not by children. I found this online, which does not distinguish itself chorally.
Me too. I thought there was a lot of rhetoric about "Englishness" without defining what it was - particularly with regards to the 5th symphony - which hopefully COTW will go towards correcting, though on general evidence I'm not holding my breff. Also, it was amusing someone of the hyper-conservative ilk of Simon Heffer by implication recommending what he described as the revolutionary aspects of Parry's music - a case, as so often, of revolution being OK at sufficient distance. Dear me - what would the Hefferlump's political forbears have said?
And the programme rather missed the visionary and subversive side of Blake's Jerusalem . It is very far , as Parry instinctively grasped , from being a patriotic hymn.
I thought COTW gave a much better portrait of Parry than the Heffer prog. I can't pretend to have the knowledge that others on this strand have of his work. He clearly had great melodic gifts but some of it does seem a bit ploddingly worked through e.g. the very beautiful slow movt of the 2nd symphony played today - what would his hero Brahms have made of the same material? Still it is enough to be able to create beauty surely ? I wonder he'd gone to France / Germany he might have developed more as a composer? Finally for all his idiosyncrasies good to hear Robert Tear in that lovely setting of the Keat's sonnet .
I wonder if anyone knows Parry's Pied Piper of Hamelin? It is scored for orchestra, SATB choir plus tenor and bass soloists. I think Parry intended it to be 'for children' but not by children. I found this online, which does not distinguish itself chorally.
I've always loved Parry's music, and am greatly looking forward to his being next Composer of the Week on the Third. Incidentally, a good friend of mine had a grandmother who had been in service to the Parrys at Highnam Court, so we all went down to Gloucestershire for a sort of nostalgia trip, to see the grounds and the House. And of course, he had a town house in London, just off High Street Kensington, which was not very far from the Royal Albert Hall
Me too. I thought there was a lot of rhetoric about "Englishness" without defining what it was...
I seem to remember there was a TV programme on Parry a few years back with the Prince of Wales and Professor Jeremy Dibble (who appears to be the 'go to' expert on the composer.) I recall that HRH seemed obsessed with the "Englishness" of the music, again with no firm definition of it.
I seem to remember there was a TV programme on Parry a few years back with the Prince of Wales and Professor Jeremy Dibble (who appears to be the 'go to' expert on the composer.) I recall that HRH seemed obsessed with the "Englishness" of the music, again with no firm definition of it.
I thought COTW gave a much better portrait of Parry than the Heffer prog. I can't pretend to have the knowledge that others on this strand have of his work. He clearly had great melodic gifts but some of it does seem a bit ploddingly worked through e.g. the very beautiful slow movt of the 2nd symphony played today - what would his hero Brahms have made of the same material? Still it is enough to be able to create beauty surely ? I wonder he'd gone to France / Germany he might have developed more as a composer? Finally for all his idiosyncrasies good to hear Robert Tear in that lovely setting of the Keat's sonnet .
Roehre, late of this parish, thought very, very highly of the slow movement of the 2nd symphony and I personally love the whole work .......
I seem to remember there was a TV programme on Parry a few years back with the Prince of Wales and Professor Jeremy Dibble (who appears to be the 'go to' expert on the composer.) I recall that HRH seemed obsessed with the "Englishness" of the music, again with no firm definition of it.
But wasn't it the slow movement of the first Symphony that was played today?
(EDIT: yes, it was (just checked on the i-Player) )
Thanks for the correction . Listening on the M5 on afour hour journey to London Donald's impeccable enunciation was lost in the road roar . Parry's immaculate orchestration cut through though....
Comment