Originally posted by richardfinegold
View Post
Schoenberg, Arnold (1874-1951)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
Comment
-
-
For an "instant" (and incredibly cheap) Arnie collection, Bbm, you can't go wrong with the Boulez SONY box:
... to be complemented (chortle-chortle) by the La Salle Quartet's box of the 2VS S4tets:
... but my own favourite conductor of this Music is Robert Craft on NAXOS. His individual discs will end up costing you a lot more than both those excellent boxes combined (chortle-chortle), though.
For the Piano Music (including the Concerto) you shouldn't miss the Pollini:
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
It's nice to be reminded by S_A of all those piece I haven't heard in most cases for some considerable time. I do keep coming back to Moses though, I think it's a work in which so much comes together, for example the obvious parallels between its plot and Schoenberg's own situation as a sort of musical prophet in the cultural world of the early 20th century (with Schoenberg as Moses and Berg as Aron!), and by extension with every individual whose vision exceeds the understanding of their contemporaries, and whose lack of compromise prevents them from packaging it in an "accessible" way. The first scene is one of the most moving moments in music theatre, as far as I'm concerned, quite apart from its multi-textural complexity with the orchestra, vocal ensemble, speaking choir, and Moses suspended somewhere between ecstasy and weariness.
However, I'm at one with the postwar avantgarde bunch in being disappointed that Schoenberg's rethinking of pitch-relationships in music left everything else in more or less the state it was in when he found it. There's something about it that gives me a claustrophobic feeling, in distinction to the "emancipation" of all dimensions (not just of "dissonance") in for example Gruppen. Not to mention the way that Schoenberg's twelve-tone music so often falls back on neoclassical forms and symmetries. This again is a reason for my attachment to Moses, whose (incomplete!) form is so integrated with its urgent expressivity. I hear Erwartung in much the same sort of way.
And: I agree that the Boulez set is absolutely essential for anyone wanting to appreciate the breadth of Schoenberg's musical achievement (despite its fatal flaws... but one has to admire how high he was aiming). Many of the most memorable concert evenings in my first years as a student in London in the late 1970s involved Boulez conducting music by Schoenberg and his colleagues, like the also incomplete and almost impenetrable Jakobsleiter.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Conchis View PostVerklaerte Nacht and Pelleas Et Melisande are Schoenberg for your Granny.....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostI think Conchis's post is a bit of an insult myself. I find that the compositional style of Schoenberg in that period very interesting indeed.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostYes but Conchis's granny no doubt finds that this is the only period of Schoenberg's music which is interesting, and that everything he wrote afterwards went horribly wrong. She wouldn't be alone in this of course. While I find Verklärte Nacht beautiful in every way, I think Pelleas und Melisande is quite a problematic piece, particularly as regards its often murky and overloaded orchestration, something it shares with Zemlinsky's Die Seejungfrau which was premiered at the same concert in 1905 and which I had the opportunity to hear the other day. Both composers subsequently found ways to make their orchestral textures clearer; if not to the point of transparency then at least to the point that everything that's played can be heard and things aren't getting in each other's way.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostYes I've felt this more and more about Pelleas, having found it a useful way into understanding more than I before discovering it about how Schoenberg was expanding the harmonic and expressive language in some of the directions that would lead to the greater clarity and transparency of his post-1907 music.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostTo me, Pelleas is but a single example of an orchestral work whose impression of "murky and overloaded orchestration" might be down to the conductor rather than the composer who, in this instance, conducted it himself on several occasions; just saying...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostTo me, Pelleas is but a single example of an orchestral work whose impression of "murky and overloaded orchestration" might be down to the conductor rather than the composer who, in this instance, conducted it himself on several occasions; just saying...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostI think Conchis's post is a bit of an insult myself. I find that the compositional style of Schoenberg in that period very interesting indeed. For example, as mentioned above Pelleas & Mellissande and Verklarter Nacht.
Comment
-
Comment