Originally posted by doversoul
View Post
What we describe as "intention" is inference: that cat "knows what it is doing" as it watches the bird, but it is us, through our learned capacity for inference, who infer the cat's intention. Confusing concepts with what they describe - there is a whole discipline for understanding how language works known as signification - is, one eastern sage, can't at present remember who - said, confusing the journey with the map. Cage's philosophy of "allowing sounds to be themselves" was part and parcel of a tradition that sees the selective ego, a confabulation of memories themselves "tainted" by exclusions, as limitive of experience; he devised means which would (as far as he saw it) limit the degree of control exercised by the artistic originator over outcomes. Of course, there was a contradiction, inasmuch as he saw himself as necessary, and not just in the preliminaries; but in order not to intend, one has as a starting point to intend not to intend. The experience precipitated by the disciplines, involving concentrating, ultimately, for its own good, rather than for ulterior motive, then becomes the lesson.
Comment