Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte
View Post
Searle, Humphrey (1915 - 1982)
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostWell, it surely should have been this week, should it not?
In turn, I should also stress that my indignation at Mr Kenyon's response was no reflection of my very high regard for Musgrave's work; rather the extraordinary suggestion that the inclusion of one of her works somehow "made up" for the absence of anything by Lutyens.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostYes, it should.
In turn, I should also stress that my indignation at Mr Kenyon's response was no reflection of my very high regard for Musgrave's work; rather the extraordinary suggestion that the inclusion of one of her works somehow "made up" for the absence of anything by Lutyens.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostYes, it should.
(* = no, not that one! Although a Music Matters Searle Special would be gratefully received.)[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Here should be the Eliot Growltiger piece I was unable to check out yesterday - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUQ69qEN6vY
Comment
-
-
So nothing of Searle's was spotted all day? It was, apparently, also Sally Beamish's birthday yesterday which was recognised with a piece on Breakfast (I only checked to see if someone had requested Seavaigers as yesterday's 'water music' (after FctM the day before), but it was the birthday not the water that was mentioned.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostHere should be the Eliot Growltiger piece I was unable to check out yesterday - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUQ69qEN6vY
(Wouldn't "Eliot Growltiger" be a brilliant name for a Band Leader!)[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostSo nothing of Searle's was spotted all day? It was, apparently, also Sally Beamish's birthday yesterday which was recognised with a piece on Breakfast (I only checked to see if someone had requested Seavaigers as yesterday's 'water music' (after FctM the day before), but it was the birthday not the water that was mentioned.
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Well, as there was no response from R3 to my Facebook enquiry, I did revisit and post a link to his Symphony No 1. Unfortunately, the topic is now quite invisible - having been long buried by posts such as:
'Have you signed up for Newquay's BIG Bale Push at Crantock Village?? On September 11, this barking mad event returns for the 16th year' and
'economic advisor to China gov't just interviewed on BBC world is a propagandist at worst and a complete freakin idiot at the least.'
So much for Facebook as Radio 3's up-to-date replacement for old-fashioned messageboards …It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Humphrey Searle was born at Oxford in 1915
He was well educated at Winchester (1928–33), at Oxford university (1933–7) where he was a classical scholar, and at the RCM (1937)
He left us five grand symphonies in all. While the highly demanding and intense Symphony no. 1 – the first strictly serial symphony we are told – employs a derived row, based on the B–A–C–H motif, later works made little use of such construction. The first three symphonies all exhibit an exuberance and dramatic scoring, but this was to contrast with a move towards the gentle more meditative style of the Symphony no. 5.
They are:
Symphony no. 1 opus 23, 1953
Symphony no. 2 opus 33, 1958
Symphony no. 3 opus 36, 1960
Symphony no. 4 opus 38, 1962
Symphony no. 5 opus 43, 1964
There are also two piano concertos:
no. 1, opus 5, 1944
no. 2, opus 27, 1955
Why we wonder was he not knighted...?Last edited by Sydney Grew; 24-07-21, 00:39.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sydney Grew View PostHumphrey Searle was born at Oxford in 1915
He was decently educated at Winchester (1928–33), at Oxford university (1933–7) where he was a classical scholar, and at the RCM (1937)
He left us five grand symphonies in all. While the highly demanding and intense Symphony no. 1 – the first strictly serial symphony we are told – employs a derived row, based on the B–A–C–H motif, later works made little use of such construction. The first three symphonies all exhibit an exuberance and dramatic scoring, but this was to contrast with a move towards the gentle more meditative style of the Symphony no. 5.
They are:
Symphony no. 1 opus 23, 1953
Symphony no. 2 opus 33, 1958
Symphony no. 3 opus 36, 1960
Symphony no. 4 opus 38, 1962
Symphony no. 5 opus 43, 1964
There are also two piano concertos:
no. 1, opus 5, 1944
no. 2, opus 27, 1955
Why we wonder was he not knighted...?
Comment
-
Comment