Originally posted by richardfinegold
View Post
Milhaud
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostI think that you have a point about Holmboe but he's certainly nowhere near the worst case of this, his compatriot Bentzon (who also wrote some fine music) being near the top of the prolificity tree in the past century or so. I'd be tempted to add Havergal Brian also, for all that this might upset some members here; his best work is astonishing but some of the later pieces when his attention was turning more and more to symphonies and less to other works do seem a good deal less inspired and might have fared better had he sought to confine himself to writing less. Schubert began to write a fiar bit less during his last 18 months or so and, had he been able to continue in that vein for another two or more decades, I suspect that the general view of him today might be quite different.
I don't know Bentzon at all. If you had to recommend one or two best examples of his oeuvre, what would you choose?
Comment
-
-
quite and that would be Simonton's evidence as well; a mark is a mark, not a conclusive proof eh ....
as to Bach duds some of the organ works and cantatas feel pedestrian
that violin piece by Mihaud is wondrous S_A!According to the best estimates of astronomers there are at least one hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostI think that you have a point about Holmboe but he's certainly nowhere near the worst case of this, his compatriot Bentzon (who also wrote some fine music) being near the top of the prolificity tree in the past century or so.
Segerstam's tally (or is it folly?) means that English symphonist Derek Bourgeois, who is on Symphony No. 96 "must try harder". Bourgeois does get my award for best titled symphony .... No.52 is called "The Halfway".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aka Calum Da Jazbo View Postas to Bach duds some of the organ works and cantatas feel pedestrian
Not showing off, here - I'm bewildered by the quality: it doesn't seem right!
Sorry - off-topic. I prefer listening to Milhaud than to Hindemith, if that's any use to anyone ...[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boilk View PostComposer (and conductor, assuming he doesn't have a double) Leif Segerstam has just completed his Symphony No. 285. Has anybody on this board heard any of them? I suspect they are very diverse.
Segerstam's tally (or is it folly?) means that English symphonist Derek Bourgeois, who is on Symphony No. 96 "must try harder". Bourgeois does get my award for best titled symphony .... No.52 is called "The Halfway".
Derek was, of course, Professor of Music at Bristol University, so I knew both him (and his wife, a very useful viola player who helped us out on numerous occasions) quite well.
HS
Comment
-
-
Richard Barrett
Originally posted by Hornspieler View Posthis wife, a very useful viola player
I was listening on Youtube a while ago to Milhaud's Harp Concerto - the first movement seemed completely uninspired but then the second had a rather attractive strangeness about it. I have the impression there are probably beautiful things to be found here and there in his huge output, but as with Villa-Lobos, about whom I have a similar suspicion, I haven't yet had the opportunity to seek them out.
As for Bach "duds", well no. Like certain other activities, Bach starts at good and gets better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostAs for Bach "duds", well no. Like certain other activities, Bach starts at good and gets better.
Comment
-
Comment