Originally posted by gurnemanz
View Post
Dvorak
Collapse
X
-
The Serenade Op. 44 for 9 winds ( who include 3 horns ) cello & double bass, is a 'minor masterpiece' ( but then I would say that wouldn't I?).
I do agree with pastoralguy about the wonderfully poignant last movement of the Cello concerto with its sudden emergence of the solo violin that never fails to generate goosebumps.
And then, finally, after the almost unbearably wistful musings of the cello in the 'long-a-dying' coda, culminating in that long-held cello high F# climbing to the high B, just as one is managing to wipe away the tears, Dvorak gives us his last master-stroke, in the orchestral 'tutti' - a glorious 'flattened seventh' chord ( ' A major' superimposed on the 'home key' of B major) before the animated 'play out' of the last six bars.
Comment
-
-
I love much Dvorak, though he can get rather bogged-down (well, boring) quite often. Of the symphonies, the New World will always be tops (yes, I can list its deficiencies too) though all from 5 onward are fine. I'm very fond of 4 apart from the finale, which demands too much of any conductor to soften the 'rum-pum rum-ti-tum' repetitions (note the anticipation of Elgar's The Kingdom in the slow movement). I love the opening of 3, though it rather peters out.
I love every note of the cello concerto (a work I've conducted, so I've got to know it intimately anyway) and the violin concerto is fun if I'm in the right mood.
I've never quite taken to the late tone poems, though, but I enjoy both Serenades, the Czech Suite, the Slavonic Dances, My Home, In Nature's Realm, Carnival and the Scherzo Capriccioso.
Of the chamber works, I love the A major piano quintet, the E-flat string quintet, the 'American' quartet, the Bagatelles, and the violin Sonatina.
I can sit through the Stabat Mater, and the Te Deum is fun.
I'd never want to be without Dvorak.
Comment
-
-
I agree with pretty well everything you say, Pabs.
But, do have another think ( or listen to, if you have a recording) about Symphony #2 in Bb. I will never forget recording that work with the LSO and the woefully undervalued Witold Rowicki over 40 years ago, in the lovely wood-panelled acoustic of Wembley Town Hall.
Ok, it's a bit 'sprawly' and repetitious but the TUNES and the orchestration are magnificent. I think it holds together in its totality much better than #3 and #4 which both start out wonderfully and then sort-of peter out in their inspiration.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View PostI agree with pretty well everything you say, Pabs.
But, do have another think ( or listen to, if you have a recording) about Symphony #2 in Bb. I will never forget recording that work with the LSO and the woefully undervalued Witold Rowicki over 40 years ago, in the lovely wood-panelled acoustic of Wembley Town Hall.
Ok, it's a bit 'sprawly' and repetitious but the TUNES and the orchestration are magnificent. I think it holds together in its totality much better than #3 and #4 which both start out wonderfully and then sort-of peter out in their inspiration.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gurnemanz View PostI went to see Rusalka in German about 40 years ago and remember not being hugely riveted by the experience.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by David-G View PostPerhaps you should try again! I find Rusalka one of the most moving of all operas, from start to finish. Of course, one has to see it in a good production. I have been lucky enough to see two superb ones - Glyndebourne and the Pountney production at the ENO. Whatever you do, don't go to the ghastly ROH production if they revive it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gurnemanz View PostA few things I like:
I have a soft spot for the Sixth with Pesek and the Czech Phil + a bracing In Nature's Realm.
The Dumky Trio has always appealed to me.
Let me add two:
Serenade for Strings
Overture :"Carnival"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gurnemanz View PostOriginally Posted by David-G
Perhaps you should try again! I find Rusalka one of the most moving of all operas, from start to finish. Of course, one has to see it in a good production. I have been lucky enough to see two superb ones - Glyndebourne and the Pountney production at the ENO. Whatever you do, don't go to the ghastly ROH production if they revive it.
I'm sure it was my fault and if I get a chance I will try again.
I find the ending of Rusalka remarkable. She is condemned to a watery limbo, neither human nor water nymph, shunned by all her sisters... And yet in a curious way she is redeemed by her love of the Prince and his for her; the closing music glows with optimism, and one leaves the theatre with a "feel-good factor".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View PostI agree with pretty well everything you say, Pabs.
But, do have another think ( or listen to, if you have a recording) about Symphony #2 in Bb. I will never forget recording that work with the LSO and the woefully undervalued Witold Rowicki over 40 years ago, in the lovely wood-panelled acoustic of Wembley Town Hall.
Ok, it's a bit 'sprawly' and repetitious but the TUNES and the orchestration are magnificent. I think it holds together in its totality much better than #3 and #4 which both start out wonderfully and then sort-of peter out in their inspiration.
But, at 51'50, there are still cuts in Rowicki's No.2 aren't there? Seek out Rozhdestvensky/USSR TV&RLSO (!), on the Audiophile Classics Gold CD. At 62'37, it must be the closest we'll get to a complete version and just happens to be stunningly well-played, recorded and remastered. (And appears to be a terrific bargain on Amazon now - ready, steady...).
I do find the early symphonies (1-4) really open up as you get to know them, and the Wagnerian influence is fascinating (Dvorak loves forest murmurs...). Suitner's Berlin Staatskapelle set is evocative here (though heavily cut in 1 & 2). Smetacek's Prague SO reading of No.3 is VERY special, marvellously sung and rhythmically sprung! THAT's what we mean by idiomatic...
(... but the Supraphon Archiv SQ occasionally inclined to harshness on some systems...)Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 04-09-13, 03:28.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostI see you're no longer Kidding, Beefy (or Kippering come to that) but you have acquired punctuation.
On Dvorak, you remind me of two further wonderful pieces that I'd overlooked, the American Quartet and the Te Deum
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
I don't think anyone has mentioned Silent Woods Op 68 and the Rondo for cello Op 94, both discovered via a Naxos CD of "Virtuoso cello showpieces" by Maria Kliegel (a pupil of Janos Starker acc. to the sleeve notes). Both gorgeous works.
Heard Isserlis give a fine perf. of the cello concerto in Cardiff a couple of years ago, with Andras Schiff conducting.
Dvorak's gift for melody (among much else) never ceases to amaze me.
Comment
Comment