Originally posted by Petrushka
View Post
COTW - Film muzac
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
Spot on, Alpen. And likewise with JW's music as we are hearing this week; it is a treat to hear it without the visuals. It is dissapointing to hear the same snobbish attitude to film music here that has persisted since the days of Korngold.
But then when a number of posters seem to take pride in the fact that they never go to the cinema, one wonders just how narrow their boundaries are......
You don't have to watch movies to have broad horizons. I know plenty of people who watch plenty of movies who might be thought to have rather narrow "boundaries". But then who am I to judge them?I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Paul Sherratt
Of course yer proper classical tunes only work for most folk when they're alongside an image or two.
( Retreats back under blanket )
Comment
-
Thropplenoggin
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostSpeaking for myself , Mr Pee, I don't take pride in never going to the cinema . I just don't go, because I don't tend to enjoy the Hollywood stuff that is on at my local cinema, I don't enjoy the experience,(blood Diamond being a perfect example for me) and I have a lot of other worthwhile things to do with my time and money.
You don't have to watch movies to have broad horizons. I know plenty of people who watch plenty of movies who might be thought to have rather narrow "boundaries". But then who am I to judge them?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
It is dissapointing to hear the same snobbish attitude to film music here that has persisted since the days of Korngold.
Is there any point in in-depth discussion about film music without visual reference?
P.S. Don’t they compose music like the theme tune (I think) from Orfeu Negro or the song that Jeanne Moreau sang in Jules et Jim anymore?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
Spot on, Alpen. And likewise with JW's music as we are hearing this week; it is a treat to hear it without the visuals. It is dissapointing to hear the same snobbish attitude to film music here that has persisted since the days of Korngold.
But then when a number of posters seem to take pride in the fact that they never go to the cinema, one wonders just how narrow their boundaries are......
I think the 'snobbish' attitudes to film music actually derive from those who, since Korngold, have insisted that it's good enough to stand alongside music written for independent performance. If the film composers want their music played independently why don't they write independent music?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostSurely the whole point about film music is that it's written to accompany 'the visuals'? It's written to help create a mood, or set a scene. If it's worth listening to in its own right it has become too dominant in the context of the film, too distracting. Good film music should be part of the whole & not too obvious (I'd go as far as to say it should be unmemorable). If it's good enough to be heard in the concert hall it's not good film music. Film music, especially in modern films with rapid changes of scene, is going to be episodic - rather unsatisfying to hear independently.
I think the 'snobbish' attitudes to film music actually derive from those who, since Korngold, have insisted that it's good enough to stand alongside music written for independent performance. If the film composers want their music played independently why don't they write independent music?Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.
Mark Twain.
Comment
-
-
It took a surprisingly long time for someone to mention opera. I think the difference between opera & film music is that opera can't exist without music - the music isn't there to support whatever else is happening, it is what's happening. The characters sing, & their music is integral to the whole. It would be perfectly possible to watch a film without the music (even a film that has had music written for it) without losing anything.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mr Pee View PostOh well, I'd better stop listening to Operas without the visual aspect then.
[ed.] oops, too late (this is like Classical Music Association thread).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostSurely the whole point about film music is that it's written to accompany 'the visuals'? It's written to help create a mood, or set a scene. If it's worth listening to in its own right it has become too dominant in the context of the film, too distracting. Good film music should be part of the whole & not too obvious (I'd go as far as to say it should be unmemorable). If it's good enough to be heard in the concert hall it's not good film music. Film music, especially in modern films with rapid changes of scene, is going to be episodic - rather unsatisfying to hear independently.
I think the 'snobbish' attitudes to film music actually derive from those who, since Korngold, have insisted that it's good enough to stand alongside music written for independent performance. If the film composers want their music played independently why don't they write independent music?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostI think you've used a very narrow definition of film music here. True, if music is there just to create atmosphere, you may well have a point, but surely music can be much more than that? Opera and incidental music for plays show us that fine music can come out of the least promising of things; film music should not be restricted to the purely functional. I don't have a problem with film music, but there is a large amount of routine dross out there obscuring some real gems.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by doversoul View PostYes, film music can be a very fine thing and can be listened to and enjoyed independent of the film for which it was originally composed. A lot of ‘standard’ popular songs and music are in fact theme tunes from films. The question I am asking is, is Composer of the Week the right place for it?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostI think you've used a very narrow definition of film music here. True, if music is there just to create atmosphere, you may well have a point, but surely music can be much more than that? Opera and incidental music for plays show us that fine music can come out of the least promising of things; film music should not be restricted to the purely functional. I don't have a problem with film music, but there is a large amount of routine dross out there obscuring some real gems.
I think it would be interesting to have a history of film music - from its origins as accompaniament to silent films - & why films, generally, have music while plays, generally, don't.
Comment
-
-
Flossie and dovers points are valid for a large proportion of films, but the best film scores transcend this mere "background" effect: in a documentary devoted to Herrmann (who did write some very good concert pieces as well as his CotW-worthy film scores) the car scene from Psycho was shown without Music. This was a very dull 10 minutes. Then again with those strings - the hairs shivered down my spine!
Similarly with Scott of the Antarctic: the Music - unobtrusively, surreptitiously - created the tone of the film, giving those "stiff-upper-lip" performances a genuine depth of courage.
That sort of film Music is worthy of general praise and discussion. I don't like Williams' scores, but even giving him as much benefit of the doubt as I possibly can, too much of his music seems to me to be very "one-size fits all": the ET theme JLW cites could be swapped with the Music that accompanies Superman flying with Lois Lane; the dinosaurs in Jurrasic Park interchangeable with the Jaws theme. Fine for general purpose, and for the contexts they serve, but I can't take them away from those contexts.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment