Elgar 29 Jul - 2 Aug

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Serial_Apologist
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 37812

    #46
    Originally posted by smittims View Post
    Hi, S-A, you might be interested in JPE Harper Scott's book 'Elgar, a modernist composer' (Cambridge 2010). I haven't read it, though I was most interested to read your posts above .

    On could, of course, say 'it depends what you mean by 'modernism'. Parry was acclaimed as a 'modernist ' in the 1880s when his Prometheus Unbound was first performed, and while Elgar's musical language didn't keep pace with the rapid advances of Schoenberg and Stravinsky in the early 20th century, there are passages in the two big oratorios, the secoind symphony and Falstaff which would have sounded very modern to their first audiences .
    Thanks smittins - I'll definitely look into Mr Scott's book.

    Comment

    • silvestrione
      Full Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 1722

      #47
      Thanks to S-A for his thoughtful, knowledgeable extended posts. Helpful for me as recently I have made a bit more headway than before with AS and Berg (have always liked Webern).

      Not sure I've ever listened to Elgar's Violin Sonata. Must try it.

      I'm another admirer (well, I love!) Rubbra Sym 5, 6 and 7.

      Comment

      • smittims
        Full Member
        • Aug 2022
        • 4325

        #48
        For me the classic version of the Elgar sonata is Sammons/Murdoch on Naxos or Dutton, but Sammons' pupil Hugh Bean made a fine stereo version for EMI with David Parkhouse.

        Comment

        • LMcD
          Full Member
          • Sep 2017
          • 8627

          #49
          Originally posted by smittims View Post
          For me the classic version of the Elgar sonata is Sammons/Murdoch on Naxos or Dutton, but Sammons' pupil Hugh Bean made a fine stereo version for EMI with David Parkhouse.
          The Nash Ensemble's version on Helios is coupled with the sublime Piano Quintet.

          Comment

          • hmvman
            Full Member
            • Mar 2007
            • 1121

            #50
            I was a bit disappointed that we only got one movement of the violin sonata but all of the 'cello concerto. A nod to populism, I suspect.

            Comment

            • smittims
              Full Member
              • Aug 2022
              • 4325

              #51
              This is one of the faults of this programme for me. That sonata does need hearing entire to make its effect, not least because there are thematic links from one movement to another.

              I think COTW needs replacing with a similar strand which allows only complete works. This of course would explode the one -hour fixed format, as (for instance) a programme in a series on Wagner would need longer episodes that a Webern series. I'd like to see more emphasis (in the spoken bits) on the music than on. for example, how many children the composer's wife was having, etc.

              Comment

              • Sir Velo
                Full Member
                • Oct 2012
                • 3258

                #52
                Originally posted by smittims View Post

                I think COTW needs replacing with a similar strand which allows only complete works. This of course would explode the one -hour fixed format, as (for instance) a programme in a series on Wagner would need longer episodes that a Webern series. I'd like to see more emphasis (in the spoken bits) on the music than on. for example, how many children the composer's wife was having, etc.
                There has to be a balance between the biographical and the musicological but I would say that the programme has erred recently far too much in the direction of the former.

                Comment

                • Serial_Apologist
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 37812

                  #53
                  Looking through a list of Elgar's living addresses, I discovered his first London address to have been here in Crystal Palace in 1889, when they had married. I could find no physical trace of The Oaks, on Fountain Drive. Then yesterday it occurred to me that it might be on one of my old maps, and there it was, actually marked on the 1871 OS Kent Sheet 7.10 centreing on the Palace, where Elgar had some gigs I believe - his main reason for their moving this way. The exact location of the house - sandwiched in the tight angle where Fountain Drive forks away south from College Road, so it must have been small - now has two houses from the 1950s on it. I slightly know the man living there - my upstairs neighbour does his accounts. It is a mere two minutes' stroll from where I live!
                  Last edited by Serial_Apologist; 15-01-24, 23:25.

                  Comment

                  • smittims
                    Full Member
                    • Aug 2022
                    • 4325

                    #54
                    I've read that they could hear the organ pedal notes from the Palace. Goodness knows what an orchestra sounded like in that space.

                    If only Elgar had hit success in that first London period his career might have been very different.

                    Comment

                    • Nick Armstrong
                      Host
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 26569

                      #55
                      Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post

                      There has to be a balance between the biographical and the musicological but I would say that the programme has erred recently far too much in the direction of the former.
                      Just catching up with the “Self-Made Man” episode, and had to relisten to one thing to make sure I hadn’t mis-heard… but no, a rare lapse: DM referred to Elgar’s disappointment at not being in the Coronation Honours List in June 1902 for the “new king, George V”……
                      "...the isle is full of noises,
                      Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                      Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                      Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                      Comment

                      • smittims
                        Full Member
                        • Aug 2022
                        • 4325

                        #56
                        He also referred to Dora Penney as Dora Powell, which she wasn't at the time Elgar knew her in Malvern. I hear lots of little slips like these, which is one reason I've stopped listening.

                        Comment

                        • Serial_Apologist
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 37812

                          #57
                          Originally posted by smittims View Post
                          He also referred to Dora Penney as Dora Powell, which she wasn't at the time Elgar knew her in Malvern. I hear lots of little slips like these, which is one reason I've stopped listening.
                          Lack of time allowing for checking and proof-reading, I wonder?

                          Comment

                          • Sir Velo
                            Full Member
                            • Oct 2012
                            • 3258

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Nick Armstrong View Post

                            Just catching up with the “Self-Made Man” episode, and had to relisten to one thing to make sure I hadn’t mis-heard… but no, a rare lapse: DM referred to Elgar’s disappointment at not being in the Coronation Honours List in June 1902 for the “new king, George V”……
                            That is a bad error and suggestive that the interns have been let loose again without appropriate supervision or review of their "output". However, DM and/or the producer should have sufficient general knowledge to be able to rectify on the fly.

                            Comment

                            • Serial_Apologist
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 37812

                              #59
                              Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post

                              That is a bad error and suggestive that the interns have been let loose again without appropriate supervision or review of their "output". However, DM and/or the producer should have sufficient general knowledge to be able to rectify on the fly.
                              And put right, as an old work colleague would say whenever anyone used this word!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X