Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte
View Post
Haydn’s Keyboard Sonatas: 17-21 July
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOooh, yes! And quite a bit cheaper than the CAPRICCIO box, too!
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Haydn-Compl.../dp/B001DSR9PCMy life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pianorak View PostOooh, yes! Thanks Ferney. Snapped up the Used - Like New.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post.
... I think he's a bit heavy-handed. If you want a modern-keyboard set, I think I wd prefer -
http://amzn.eu/2egggSR
Comment
-
-
I've known some of the later sonatas off various LPs since student days. Bought the Schornsheim set when it came out and was amazed how 'classically motivic/ developmental' the very earliest works are, even though entitled Divertimentos or Partitas. Haydn was already Haydn in 1766 apparently!
(Fully-formed from the head of Zeus??)I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AmpH View PostWith due respect to those already mentioned and although not a complete set , I could not imagine being without Alfred Brendel on Philips - he gets right to the heart of the music like no other ( imho ).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostWhat? No votes for Brautigam's survey of the complete solo keyboard works?
I would put Brautigam at the top of my list - sensitive, witty playing alongside a lovely, crisp, clean recording. I also like Schornsheim for her use of appropriate harpsichords and fortepianos, but for me, Brautigam reigns supreme. His other complete Mozart sonatas box for BIS is equally as good.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AmpH View PostWith due respect to those already mentioned and although not a complete set , I could not imagine being without Alfred Brendel on Philips - he gets right to the heart of the music like no other ( imho ).
I'd also agree with those who think McCabe is a bit pedestrian. It is a fine set, but does lack the sparkle, wit and outright panache of the best performances. To be harsh, I suppose it shows the difference between a really good pianist and a really great one (like Brendel).
If you are newish to the Haydn sonatas, I wouldn't worry too much about a "complete" set. The Haydn sonatas are a mixed bunch, quality wise. The very early ones - say the first dozen or so - are hardly more than simple exercises for not very gifted students. Movements are sometimes less than 30 seconds long and half the movements are not very interesting minuets - not much different to the kind of generic pedagogic stuff you find in the Nannerl notebooks. After that, things get more interesting and there are quite a few masterpieces among the remaining 40 or so left. There is also a lot of variety. It is the Haydn of the piano trios - experimental, quirky,daring, frequently profound. As Gould put it in the liner notes to his (fabulous and very funny) late Haydn set, "no two are cut from the same cookie stamp", though they are all obviously works of the same master.
Finally, I wouldn't worry too much about the Last Seven Words transcription. It really doesn't work very well (though Haydn did play it on "tour", apparently.......). As we are talking about 8 movements in a very slow tempo, there is really only one way to do this on the piano and that is to have a plonking crotchet beat all the way through........boink.......boink......boink....... boink..........What is indispensable, on the other hand, is the F minor variations - one of the absolute pinnacles of the repertoire and you get that in Brendel.
Comment
-
-
Waldo - I wholeheartedly agree with you. If you don't mind I'll "push" the Andras Schiff Haydn selections once more: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Haydn-Piano...0TRXXBZZ6AEBBHMy life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pianorak View Post... If you don't mind I'll "push" the Andras Schiff Haydn selections once more:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Haydn-Piano...0TRXXBZZ6AEBBH
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by waldo View PostI'd go along with that and I am not much of Brendel fan in general. An indispensable set.
I'd also agree with those who think McCabe is a bit pedestrian. It is a fine set, but does lack the sparkle, wit and outright panache of the best performances. To be harsh, I suppose it shows the difference between a really good pianist and a really great one (like Brendel).
If you are newish to the Haydn sonatas, I wouldn't worry too much about a "complete" set. The Haydn sonatas are a mixed bunch, quality wise. The very early ones - say the first dozen or so - are hardly more than simple exercises for not very gifted students. Movements are sometimes less than 30 seconds long and half the movements are not very interesting minuets - not much different to the kind of generic pedagogic stuff you find in the Nannerl notebooks. After that, things get more interesting and there are quite a few masterpieces among the remaining 40 or so left. There is also a lot of variety. It is the Haydn of the piano trios - experimental, quirky,daring, frequently profound. As Gould put it in the liner notes to his (fabulous and very funny) late Haydn set, "no two are cut from the same cookie stamp", though they are all obviously works of the same master.
Finally, I wouldn't worry too much about the Last Seven Words transcription. It really doesn't work very well (though Haydn did play it on "tour", apparently.......). As we are talking about 8 movements in a very slow tempo, there is really only one way to do this on the piano and that is to have a plonking crotchet beat all the way through........boink.......boink......boink....... boink..........What is indispensable, on the other hand, is the F minor variations - one of the absolute pinnacles of the repertoire and you get that in Brendel.
Comment
-
Comment