Originally posted by Master Jacques
View Post
Luise Adolpha Le Beau (1850-1927): 2-6/12/24
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
I can't help wondering if criticism of and dissatisfaction with COTW these days is in part a result of the lack of the kind of more meaty treatment that used to be available on R3. If the more technical considerations of a composer's output are addressed in a dedicated programme, then the more superficial approach of COTW isn't such an issue as there are alternatives. I appreciate the opportunity COTW allows me to be introduced to composers I would never otherwise encounter, and also to look at aspects of well known composers in a way I find easy to understand.That I realise is anathema to the serious music-lovers , but so be it. As a teenager and young adult in orchestras and singing groups outside school I became used to the dismissive and superior attitudes from those who were better informed and more talented than I. Didn't like it, but the desire to continue with the music making was more important than the effect on my self-confidence and feeling of inferiority.
Who was it who said, that 'if you feel you're the stupidest person in the room, then you're in the right room'? Don't dismissive and superior attitudes harden us to prove such people wrong?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post
There's a great deal in what you say. Composer of the Week had precisely this strong and useful educational function, in a period where it was actually at the 'popular' end of Radio 3's output.
"Presentation should be light, brief and engaging - informative, but inclusive. Detailed musicological and biographical detail should be kept to a minimum. This is more suited to Composer of the Week which follows at 12.00."
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post
I am sure you'd agree, that 'unconscious [fill in the blank-ism]' is notoriously the last bastion for those whose campaigning positions fail to stand up to fact, and who resort to amateur psychology instead. The slur relies on theories of the 'unconscious' which are to say the least, open to argument, and can come over as an easy put-down.
I would recommend next time you are 'cut up' by another driver, checking out with yourself what you say to yourself about the driver - gender, race etc. A useful exercise.
But I'll say no more here on that topic.Last edited by kernelbogey; 06-12-24, 11:25.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostI would recommend next time you are 'cut up' by another driver, checking out with yourself what you say to yourself about the driver - gender, race etc. A useful exercise..
(And I am inured to prejudice, conscious or unconscious, against my musical tastes!)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
I've just located R3's commissioning brief for Essential Classics, year 2017-2018, including:
"Presentation should be light, brief and engaging - informative, but inclusive. Detailed musicological and biographical detail should be kept to a minimum. This is more suited to Composer of the Week which follows at 12.00."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostAs I don't drive, and never could, the only people who 'cut me up' are cyclists driving on the pavement. They get my standard response 'you are breaking the law', irrespective of age, sex, gender, sexuality, race or creed.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
That's not COTW's fault though is it - it's because of what has been stripped away from around it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
Who are only there in the first place due to the totally inadequate provision for those who prefer active travel as a means of transportation (compare Paris; Amsterdam, Copenhagen etc), by which they keep themselves fit, thereby reducing the burden on the NHS (ie the taxpayer or you and me if you prefer!) but don't get me started!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post
Yes indeed, F. R. Leavis still reigns!
One particularly interesting exercise, for me, is to try and move away from Leavis, by examining cases where the biography is inextricably linked with the art, as its subject. This is not true of many composers, as it needs a facility in the written word which only Berlioz (among household names) possessed. I often wonder what his music would amount to without its biographical component in the listener's mind. My answer - like that of his own French classicist contemporaries - is, not a hill of beans.
It's rather the same case with Mahler, who has reached his current sainted status for biographical as much as musical reasons.
Thing is Leavis produced some very good criticism on Yeats without mentioning the Easter arising or Maud Gonne once.
To your earlier point on the sometimes irrelevancy of biography I must have read 8 to 10 lives of Mozart including classics like Robbins Landon’s which just cover one year. But do I really “know “ Mozart? I know a lot of facts but
These great geniuses are essentially unknowable . The sad facts of his last months just aren’t reflected in the triumph of his music, It’s all been sentimentalised, You ending up “knowing “ more about Mozart from Act 2 of Nozze or stumbling through a sonata than listening to a hundred COTW’s.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostThe sad facts of his last months just aren’t reflected in the triumph of his music, It’s all been sentimentalised, You ending up “knowing “ more about Mozart from Act 2 of Nozze or stumbling through a sonata than listening to a hundred COTW’s.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostThat's not COTW's fault though is it - it's because of what has been stripped away from around it.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
"I agree with Nick."
The rise of feminism in my lifetime - well, in the second half of my lifetime - is a beacon of hope for humanity in my view. I imagine that would be true for many if not all who post here. The struggles of women like Le Beau - in the 1850s! - are also a beacon of hope.
In my view, and in my experience, it is easy to get caught in unconscious misogyny, and we must guard against it.
Comment
-
Comment