Music Education in England

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DracoM
    Host
    • Mar 2007
    • 12977

    Music Education in England



    Item on Music hubs and Education. Hear it and tremble.
    Incidentally, four experts gathered, segment FAR too short for such a crucial topic.
    R3 has a responsibility to reflect the incremental crisis in funding, teaching, access to music of all kinds in schools.
    If R3 doesn't, then who the heck does?
  • Anna

    #2
    Just caught the end of the programme, need to LA, but my goodness that James Rhodes did speak a lot of common sense didn't he?!!

    Comment

    • DracoM
      Host
      • Mar 2007
      • 12977

      #3
      Absolutely, Anna, Top drawer from James Rhodes, and far, far more utterly fearless than any R3 presenter could be. Talk about calling it like it is!! That Ch4 doc series looks one not to miss!!

      Comment

      • Eine Alpensinfonie
        Host
        • Nov 2010
        • 20570

        #4
        All rather depressing. The Hubs were a cosmetic way of hiding huge funding cuts. Ofsted is now no more than an arm of the government's policies/opinions.

        Comment

        • MrGongGong
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 18357

          #5
          Predictable and superficial
          and no discussion of MUSIC

          Why on earth does PT keep referring to "Headmasters" ??
          Guess what, some schools are run by WOMEN (it's like CE )

          It's a bit of a car crash after all the enthusiasm for the Henley Review which so many folks, naively imv, got so excited about.
          Guess what, there's not much money and less is yet to come.
          Only when there is a real discussion (which does take place amongst many music educators) about what music is in schools for that we might get somewhere. But the sad fact is that many of the schools I don't visit anymore to run projects don't event do music at all.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30323

            #6
            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
            Only when there is a real discussion (which does take place amongst many music educators) about what music is in schools for that we might get somewhere.
            What is it?
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • MrGongGong
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 18357

              #7
              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              What is it?
              What is music for ?
              This has been going the rounds for a while



              If we think that music education is simply a talent quest to fill the orchestras/x factor shows of the future then we loose so much

              Comment

              • Anna

                #8
                Originally posted by DracoM View Post
                Absolutely, Anna, Top drawer from James Rhodes, and far, far more utterly fearless than any R3 presenter could be. Talk about calling it like it is!! That Ch4 doc series looks one not to miss!!
                I'd like to see James Rhodes in conversation with Roger Wright - He was so spot on re crossover and classical. I'll listen again tomorrow to hear it all but I think I missed something, what Ch4 docu did you mean?

                Comment

                • DracoM
                  Host
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 12977

                  #9
                  JR is making a doc ref music in schools for Ch4.

                  Comment

                  • MrGongGong
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 18357

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Anna View Post
                    He was so spot on re crossover and classical.
                    I thought he was a little confused
                    At the start he said how the word "Classical" wasn't always useful and we should maybe use the word "music"
                    then seemed to use it over and over
                    Though I thought he was spot on with regard to the "classical brits" ..... fake shite that it is.

                    Enthusiasm is always engaging
                    sadly being a music teacher isn't something that many of the most enthusiastic musicians would consider as an option

                    Comment

                    • DracoM
                      Host
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 12977

                      #11
                      He actually made some pretty clear distinctions, named names eg Clayderman, and then said that 'crossover' was NOT 'classical'. Which seemed to make sense to me. But maybe I'm not very bright this morning.

                      Comment

                      • gradus
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 5611

                        #12
                        I thoroughly enjoyed Mr Rhodes interview and agreed with his comments, although I had thought that he'd rubbished the label 'classical' but later went on to use it which slightly confused me, but the general drift was clear. I've seen him on television and hope that R3 broadcast one/some of his innovative-sounding recitals.

                        Comment

                        • Honoured Guest

                          #13
                          I agree that James Rhodes's contribution was very clear and persuasive. I would appreciate a weekly Radio 3 music programme presented and personally programmed by someone like him (or a small rotating team), ideally regularly scheduled in one of the Late Junction slots - a Classical on 3 equivalent of Jazz on 3 and World on 3, but maybe with less of their emphasis on balanced coverage of the current live and recorded music scenes. I think that Radio 3 is missing a properly "authored" classical music programme (except for specialists The Choir and Hear and Now). The daytime strands are too bland and general. Is there a classical music Andy Kershaw out there to get stuck in and to enthuse us? Maybe one might emerge from the Saturday Classics guest roster ...

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20570

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Honoured Guest View Post
                            Is there a classical music Andy Kershaw out there to get stuck in and to enthuse us? Maybe one might emerge from the Saturday Classics guest roster ...
                            But isn't this once again slipping into the trap of the presenter becoming more important than the topic/programme? HG's idea has much merit, but I would prefer it not to be personality-based.

                            Comment

                            • MrGongGong
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 18357

                              #15
                              I think it's a little amusing that some folks are cheering him as he is saying (and in the same vernacular ) the same kind of things that Nigel Kennedy has been saying for years. NOT that there's anything wrong with that BUT more that many of the folks who lambast Nige for how he speaks and the way he presents himself seem find it ok with mr Rhodes....




                              Do you think he will be taken more 'seriously' if he put his shirt on and cut his hair ?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X