His string quartets by the Borodin Quartet on Melodiya are wonderful.
Tchaikovsky - time to rehabilitate?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostStrains of the Nutcracker floating in from the next room as I type, someone must have switched over to Breakfast. Actually the complete Nutcracker generally gets a seasonal spin around here.
Likewise - some great live performances stick in the memory - Cotrubas' Tatyana in Yevgeny Onegin, Fonteyn and Nureyev in Sleeping Beauty, Dowell and Makarova in Swan Lake, Ida Haendel, Rostropovich (Rococo Vars.,), Queen of Spades with Gergiev and the Kirov inc. Gorchakova, Gilels in 1st concerto with Svetlanov.....
Lots of favourites. For home listening these days it tends to be chamber music and, very occasionally, one of my favourite discs, Olli Mustonen playing the Children's Album - a gem at 24 minutes that I've never heard on radio. I tend to leave the orchestral stuff for concerts these days.
Tchaikovsky's own particular blend of Romanticism and classicism is part of what appeals. By contrast I'm allergic to Rachmaninov, but that's another story.
PS love the tawny owl, cloughie!
The complete Nutcracker is a favourite of mine - LSO Previn LPs many years ago. Two recent acquisitions - downloaded Tchaikovsky Big box - from Vanguard catalogue which includes among others Stoki in No4, Monteux No5 and Romeo & Juliet plus some Abravanel in the Ballets. The other is the Ormandy Sony box of 12 cds (Sainsburys £17.99) which has the reconstructed 7th Sym and also 1/2/3/Manfred which to my knowledge have not previously appeared. Whilst I really like Rachmaninov I can understand the 'allergy syndrome' mine is Chopin's seemingly endless supply of solo piano music!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostThanks Richard, hopefully a wise change of av!
The complete Nutcracker is a favourite of mine - LSO Previn LPs many years ago. Two recent acquisitions - downloaded Tchaikovsky Big box - from Vanguard catalogue which includes among others Stoki in No4, Monteux No5 and Romeo & Juliet plus some Abravanel in the Ballets. The other is the Ormandy Sony box of 12 cds (Sainsburys £17.99) which has the reconstructed 7th Sym and also 1/2/3/Manfred which to my knowledge have not previously appeared. Whilst I really like Rachmaninov I can understand the 'allergy syndrome' mine is Chopin's seemingly endless supply of solo piano music!
Now the Liszt detractors REALLY have something to worry about.
99 of those babies.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostTchaikovsky is one of my favourite composers, always has been ever since I can remember. In fact he's a desert island composer for me.
It's queer, that having said that, I play his music less often than I used to and he rarely gets a mention on the forum.
When I was a kid, his music seemed to be everywhere, even more than Beethoven's, now it's a rarity.
Is it not time to restore him, especially given our preference for music from the 1800s?
Lest he suffers the fate of Mendelssohn
I also spent a lot of time listening in my youth to his music and then went through a spell of a few years where I generally avoided it, but I recovered from that years ago. I think it was more a case of discovering other composers who at that time were considered 1 step off the beaten track--in my case that was Mahler, Bruckner, Vaughn Williams, Elgar, Shostakovich and others--now that distinction probably has no relevance.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
I have a certain mental image of the Tchaikovsky "sound" as swinging between pretty/camp/twee, grandiose and overwrought - which for me is a limited world. But whenever hearing previously unknown Tchaikovsky, it always strikes me how much of it doesn't sound in the least like I would associate with the composer, based on the above; rather I hear anonymous music, well crafted but usually rather uninteresting and lacking in character or definition. Much of the piano music is over-ornate and indistinguishable from Liszt, to me. And I agree with his own self-definition as a symphonist, that the seams always show.
Comment
-
-
Roehre
Nothing wrong with Tchaikovsky.
Love his music (apart from his operas, which I don't know but for Onegin), not all first league (especially the piano music), but generally worth to be heard frequently (and that IMO includes 1812, which has got a bad press, but in reality certainly is not a bad piece at all).
(It is remarkable that the "popular" concertos (piano 1 and violin) are "early works" and the "popular" symphonies are relatively "late ones", with Swan Lake an early and Nutkracker a late work).
Comment
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostMuch of the piano music is over-ornate and indistinguishable from Liszt, to me.
I've just heard more Nutcracker on In Tune, second time today.
Comment
-
I wasn't aware that Tchaikovsky needed any rehabilitation. He's surely one of the handful of composers of whom everyone has heard even if they never listen to classical music.
Have to admit that I despair of the 3rd Symphony which I think is a total failure but the rest are undoubted masterpieces, including and especially Manfred.
The real under-rated work, though, in my opinion, is Swan Lake which has absolutely everything one could ask for and is a work of intense, dramatic tragedy on an epic scale. It isn't much heard in the concert hall complete and I'm surprised that more conductors haven't made extended excerpts from the ballet to keep the narrative flow as with Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet. Haitink did this in an unforgettable 1976 Prom and it was that performance that had me dashing off to the record shop to get the Rozhdestvensky highlights LP."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
I'm really looking forward to getting the new Jarvi version of Swan Lake for Christmas following his Sleeping Beauty last year.
The Third Symphony received a lot of attention on the forum around the time of a Building a Library outing. A lovely work IMHO, quite deep in its way, and plenty of interesting points of interpretation arose.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostTchaikovsky is one of my favourite composers, always has been ever since I can remember. In fact he's a desert island composer for me.
It's queer, that having said that, I play his music less often than I used to and he rarely gets a mention on the forum.
I've often wondered, had he been born 100 years later, would he have composed a Manfred Mann Symphony?
Comment
-
Comment