I'm listening to the Symphonic Mass by George Lloyd, and it is utterly beautiful music! It's making me wonder why this is not more popular than it is. There are many other figures for whom I could say the same. Why do some composers get a "big break" and others get left behind, when their music is just as worthy of acclaim and success?
Neglected composers
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by maestro267 View PostI'm listening to the Symphonic Mass by George Lloyd, and it is utterly beautiful music! It's making me wonder why this is not more popular than it is. There are many other figures for whom I could say the same. Why do some composers get a "big break" and others get left behind, when their music is just as worthy of acclaim and success?
I don't know the answer to your question,it's a mystery to me.
For ages now I've been tryng to get a Radio 3 forum George Lloyd fan club going,our next meeting is here.
-
-
Anna
Originally posted by EdgeleyRob View PostI couldn't agree more maestro.
I don't know the answer to your question,it's a mystery to me.
For ages now I've been tryng to get a Radio 3 forum George Lloyd fan club going,our next meeting is here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anna View PostCount me in the Tardis Rob, as the Doctor's assistant, I'm willing to go to outer space With you leading. Let's start a Revolution!
....ahem.
OT - is it something to do with consensus? Ultimately, a critical mass of people like some composers over others, whereas for various reasons, the "neglected" ones speak to a smaller slice of the listening public?"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by maestro267 View PostI'm listening to the Symphonic Mass by George Lloyd, and it is utterly beautiful music! It's making me wonder why this is not more popular than it is. There are many other figures for whom I could say the same. Why do some composers get a "big break" and others get left behind, when their music is just as worthy of acclaim and success?
And then ... it all just fizzled away. The majority of the enthusiasts lost their enthusiasm, and younger performers didn't find anything particularly interesting in the Music to devote their time to. And I think that that's why certain composers who had their moment in the spotlight (from previous centuries, too) cease to get performed: their Music just doesn't "do" enough for enough (numbers of) the performers who have to play it. A painting by an artist of equivalent talent can still be seen; a book of poems or a novel picked up in a Library or second-hand bookshop. But Music and Drama need performers eager and enthusiastic to perform works.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post...that's why certain composers who had their moment in the spotlight (from previous centuries, too) cease to get performed: their Music just doesn't "do" enough for enough (numbers of) the performers who have to play it. A painting by an artist of equivalent talent can still be seen; a book of poems or a novel picked up in a Library or second-hand bookshop. But Music and Drama need performers eager and enthusiastic to perform works.
(PS: Anna - Guilty! )
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
One might also ask why certain composers get the attention they do. There are surely examples of composers who get a lot of attention despite a relatively small body of works that are regularly performed live.
in fact, is not this question of neglect or otherwise partly a function of the very narrow programming that takes place both in broadcasting and in live performance, or to put it another way, the appreciation of quality is squeezed by artificial constraints?I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostIn the case of Lloyd, there was a period in the mid-'80s when you couldn't avoid his Music it was so frequently performed and recorded: he was even featured on a Desert Island Discs and was hugely popular and used as a club with which to attempt to batter "the Avant Garde" (a Gramophone article on "The Lloyd Phenomenon" asked the rhetorical question "which of today's Modernists would devote part of their life to cultivating mushrooms?" to which it received a deluge of replies with the literal answer "John Cage").
And then ... it all just fizzled away. The majority of the enthusiasts lost their enthusiasm, and younger performers didn't find anything particularly interesting in the Music to devote their time to. And I think that that's why certain composers who had their moment in the spotlight (from previous centuries, too) cease to get performed: their Music just doesn't "do" enough for enough (numbers of) the performers who have to play it. A painting by an artist of equivalent talent can still be seen; a book of poems or a novel picked up in a Library or second-hand bookshop. But Music and Drama need performers eager and enthusiastic to perform works.
I suppose those of us who find music by these neglected composers so meaningful just can't understand why others do not.
It works the other way too,I have a Sibelius potty friend who is simply baffled (probably many on here are too) as to why I get so much reward from Lloyd and yet nothing from his hero.
Surely there is of enough of interst in the likes of say Rubbra or Weinberg that performers would be keen to play it,but as I am not a musician maybe I'm wrong.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostIn the case of Lloyd, there was a period in the mid-'80s when you couldn't avoid his Music it was so frequently performed and recorded: he was even featured on a Desert Island Discs and was hugely popular and used as a club with which to attempt to batter "the Avant Garde" (a Gramophone article on "The Lloyd Phenomenon" asked the rhetorical question "which of today's Modernists would devote part of their life to cultivating mushrooms?" to which it received a deluge of replies with the literal answer "John Cage").
And then ... it all just fizzled away. The majority of the enthusiasts lost their enthusiasm, and younger performers didn't find anything particularly interesting in the Music to devote their time to. And I think that that's why certain composers who had their moment in the spotlight (from previous centuries, too) cease to get performed: their Music just doesn't "do" enough for enough (numbers of) the performers who have to play it. A painting by an artist of equivalent talent can still be seen; a book of poems or a novel picked up in a Library or second-hand bookshop. But Music and Drama need performers eager and enthusiastic to perform works.
Comment
-
-
Wasnt Lloyd one of a group of what you might call 'lyrical' British composers, who got pushed aside in favour of the more fashionably 'modernist' kind? I'll leave further discussion to those who know what they are talking about, but I'd like to put in a good word for Richard Itter, who founded the record label Lyrita. As well as Lloyd's symphonies 4, 5 and 8, I have Lyrita LPs of music by Alwyn, Bax, Berkeley, Ireland, Finzi, Leigh, Moeran, Rubbra and Scott. I always enjoy listening to them, though I have to admit that the music isnt often very memorable. You might not like the way Stockhausen makes your ears bleed, but at least its an experience you dont forget in a hurry (yes I know he wasnt British, I cant think of a British equivalent at the moment).
Comment
-
Comment