Robert Simpson as genial pedagogue

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Karafan
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 786

    Robert Simpson as genial pedagogue

    Having read and enjoyed Simpson's writings on Bruckner and Nielsen, I was attempting to find if any of his broadcast material/recorded lectures still exist.

    Nothing listed by the RS Society that I could see and just a shortish snippet on YT relating his youthful discovery of Bruckner from inside a radiogram(!). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ys90UXfPzWg

    Does anyone know of/have any of his BBC broadcasts at all?

    Thanks

    Karafan
    "Let me have my own way in exactly everything, and a sunnier and more pleasant creature does not exist." Thomas Carlyle
  • teamsaint
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 25210

    #2
    From "Espansiva," a BBCTV Workshop presentation, directed by Barrie Gavin (1970 ca.).The speaker is the composer and BBC producer Robert Simpson. Nielsen's ...


    this is great.

    (Simpson on Nielsen 5)
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

    I am not a number, I am a free man.

    Comment

    • jayne lee wilson
      Banned
      • Jul 2011
      • 10711

      #3
      I don't know of any anthologies, but how well I remember those talks - especially his analytical hatchet-job on describing a composer as "using an advanced language"...

      ...well-ferretted TS as usual!

      Comment

      • ahinton
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 16122

        #4
        Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
        I don't know of any anthologies, but how well I remember those talks - especially his analytical hatchet-job on describing a composer as "using an advanced language"
        I remember that too and thinking at the time about whether anyone would dare describe a composer as having used a retarded one...(!)...

        Comment

        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
          Gone fishin'
          • Sep 2011
          • 30163

          #5
          Do not miss this, Karafan ('tho the second-hand option is probably the one to go for!):



          ... it's essentially a 62 page essay illustrating Beethoven's technical biography as revealed in the Nine Symphonies. Utterly characteristic of the man's writing - astonishing insights, completely connected with the subject, talking to the reader (not down at him/her), gruffly and entertainingly opinionated. I bought mine in 1974 for 45p and I still return to it.
          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

          Comment

          • teamsaint
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 25210

            #6
            some (sleeve?) notes about the String Quartets here.


            what we really need is access to the Bodleian Library............#



            actually, you can access the archive if you are a member of the RS society.
            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

            I am not a number, I am a free man.

            Comment

            • jayne lee wilson
              Banned
              • Jul 2011
              • 10711

              #7
              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              Do not miss this, Karafan ('tho the second-hand option is probably the one to go for!):



              ... it's essentially a 62 page essay illustrating Beethoven's technical biography as revealed in the Nine Symphonies. Utterly characteristic of the man's writing - astonishing insights, completely connected with the subject, talking to the reader (not down at him/her), gruffly and entertainingly opinionated. I bought mine in 1974 for 45p and I still return to it.
              This is very good isn't it? A real system-side companion for me too.

              Comment

              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                Gone fishin'
                • Sep 2011
                • 30163

                #8
                Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                This is very good isn't it? A real system-side companion for me too.
                Oh yes; I wish I'd remembered what Simpson said about the repeats in the Scherzo and Finale of the Fifth on the Mahler Sixth Thread:

                My feeling is that the proper thing to do is to restore Beethoven's first colossal idea despite his own apparent uncertainty. The "final decisions" of the great masters (insofar as they are known) are often the subject of pious nonsense uttered by those to whom words are, as Alistair Sim has perfectly said, "the anodyne for the pain of thinking";

                I don't know of any other writer on Music (with the possible exception of Richard Osborne) to whom it would ever occur to refer to Alistair Sim in a discussion of Beethoven's Fifth!
                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                Comment

                • ahinton
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 16122

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                  Oh yes; I wish I'd remembered what Simpson said about the repeats in the Scherzo and Finale of the Fifth on the Mahler Sixth Thread:

                  My feeling is that the proper thing to do is to restore Beethoven's first colossal idea despite his own apparent uncertainty. The "final decisions" of the great masters (insofar as they are known) are often the subject of pious nonsense uttered by those to whom words are, as Alistair Sim has perfectly said, "the anodyne for the pain of thinking";

                  I don't know of any other writer on Music (with the possible exception of Richard Osborne) to whom it would ever occur to refer to Alistair Sim in a discussion of Beethoven's Fifth!
                  Well, even as writers on music go, Robert Simpson's never did grow on trees! A great communicator indeed!

                  Comment

                  • BBMmk2
                    Late Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20908

                    #10
                    When anybody talks about Robert Simpson, I shall always remember the meeting I went to, in Brighton, with him giving a talk(can't remember what it was about now), but his brass band music is certainly worth hearing as well.
                    Don’t cry for me
                    I go where music was born

                    J S Bach 1685-1750

                    Comment

                    • richardfinegold
                      Full Member
                      • Sep 2012
                      • 7667

                      #11
                      Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=homMLfg6ctk

                      this is great.

                      (Simpson on Nielsen 5)
                      I watched this a few weeks ago. It really is wonderful

                      Comment

                      • BBMmk2
                        Late Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 20908

                        #12
                        Thanks to teamsaint, for this headsup here. Just makes you aware, on how great a man RS was, and how he could get you yto understand the music. Jascha Horenstein!! Yes!
                        Don’t cry for me
                        I go where music was born

                        J S Bach 1685-1750

                        Comment

                        • Serial_Apologist
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 37691

                          #13
                          One needs to remember that Robert Simpson did have a very particular view of classical music - one that took Bach, Beethoven, Bruckner, Nielsen and Brian on board but not Debussy, Mahler, the Second Viennese School, Bartok, or the Darmstadt composers, let alone John Cage and Fluxus. A limited view.

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                            One needs to remember that Robert Simpson did have a very particular view of classical music - one that took Bach, Beethoven, Bruckner, Nielsen and Brian on board but not Debussy, Mahler, the Second Viennese School, Bartok, or the Darmstadt composers, let alone John Cage and Fluxus. A limited view.
                            Oh, yes - but within the tunnel vision: such insights! (Pretty good on Brahms, too. Misses the point completely with Stravinsky - not that he's alone in that limitation )
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • teamsaint
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 25210

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                              One needs to remember that Robert Simpson did have a very particular view of classical music - one that took Bach, Beethoven, Bruckner, Nielsen and Brian on board but not Debussy, Mahler, the Second Viennese School, Bartok, or the Darmstadt composers, let alone John Cage and Fluxus. A limited view.
                              interesting.
                              I suppose that is true of any teacher, S_A.
                              I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                              I am not a number, I am a free man.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X