Originally posted by Richard Barrett
View Post
Men make Better Conductors
Collapse
X
-
I think Jude has a good point.
Sadly the world is much more 'gendered' for people in their 20's now than it was when I was that age even though we do now have more women in significant roles in the arts (Jude Kelly being a case in point).
BUT
It's always seen as remarkable that a woman is conducting an orchestra? WHY on earth should that STILL be the case?
If Orchestral music was a meritocracy then the arguments against encouraging these organisations to encourage more women conductors would have some credence.
But it's not.
It's not a conspiracy.
But the idea that somehow 'talent' rises to the top and only the 'best' end up waving their arms about in front of an orchestra is a bit of a myth. (ask Hornspeiler?)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostHave you no shame? You've cut out the next bit that says that "But it [positive discrimination] was/is [necessary] because when it applied only to men (the Temirkanov observation) it took decades to get to the point of redress.."
This means that positive discrimination is necessary, the very thing you believe is odious. If you then reply 'precisely', you have contradicted yourself. Maybe you didn't mean 'precisely' and by trying to be a clever-clogs, using French, you have merely inadvertantly contradicted yourself.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostI fear tht your logic - or what may pass for it - is beyond my comprehension; What in any case would be "clever-clogs" about using a single word in French?
And it wasn't 'a single word in French', it was three - you're a very slippery man.
We need to stop this now, I don't want another visit from the mountain.
Comment
-
Comment