Originally posted by Padraig
View Post
Meaning of Vocalist?
Collapse
X
-
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostI did actually make the point that I was not differentiating on the grounds that one voice was 'superior' when I said "I stress 'particular' so that it should not be thought I mean that one style has 'quality' and the other has not."
I wonder if jean is quite satisfied with the various sfforts to address her question.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostI think that it's a well known 19th century virtuoso pianist singing his own songs (and fine - though too few and far between - most of them are, too)...
I may have a few more questions later.
Comment
-
-
This Wiki article on the 'Fach' is interesting in suggesting descriptions of the qualities of the various operatic voices. Is the classification just as much to do with the 'sweet spot' of the voice as the actual range, and the qualities it has? A low, husky, gravelly voice is not what I would associate with a contralto, for example. Heavy, rich, resonant, supple, sweet, light, lyrical, pure. And seven different types of soprano to consider.
Perhaps 'vocalist' is just 'none of the above'?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment