How do you convert a Mozart sceptic?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stanfordian
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 9314

    #76
    Originally posted by Andrew Preview View Post
    I have a music-loving friend who struggles with Mozart. I've tried to win him over with some choice selections, in conversations reminiscent of Monty Python's what-have-the-Romans-ever-done-for-us. But, ultimately, he concludes that there are just a handful of exceptions to his general indifference. His view, and I've heard it from other people too, is that Mozart is just too darn polite and/or formulaic/obvious.

    I empathise because it also took me a while to come round to him, and perhaps because I still agree that there are some significant chunks of his output to which the criticisms seem to apply pretty well. But, over time, the number of "exceptions" that I found I liked grew sufficiently to constitute a substantial body of work. If that sounds ridiculously arrogant - lucky old Mozart must be oh-so-relieved that I deign to appreciate his works - then that is completely unintended. I'm sure there are many, many cases where my failure to enjoy his compositions is purely my loss and attributable to my ignorance. He is not my favourite composer, but his best music seems to plumb the greatest depths of sadness and reach the loftiest heights of joy - and does so at least partly because of its honesty, its apparent refusal to strain for effect.

    How do other boarders react to Mozart, and what are the works that you think most likely to convert a sceptic?
    Hiya Andrew Preview, I've just come across this interesting thread. Someone once told me that music appreciation is a process. At one time Mozart was one of my lesser regarded composers but with the assistance of a talented music tutor, over time I have begun to love Mozart’s music and regard him as a genius.

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 30302

      #77
      Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
      Or indeed what is an over-reaction.

      Any praise for something one doesn't agree with, or enjoy, is excessive, of course. Just as opposition to or criticism of something that one approves of is an over-reaction.
      Heh, heh! I'm not sure that I would see it in the same way: If someone likes something more than I do, I think that's just a statement of fact: X likes Y more than I like Y (like, that's how things are). Whereas 'excessive' and 'overreaction' have a subjective element, don't they, suggesting people are in the wrong to be so extreme?
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • David-G
        Full Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 1216

        #78
        Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
        ... some of the operas are wonderful - terrific music & searching explorations of the human condition (but I think his libretist might have helped there).
        Exactly. Terrific music and searching explorations of the human condition. Mozart in a nutshell.

        Of course any opera composer requires a fine librettist. But da Ponte's contribution to the operas does not detract from Mozart's; rather, it inspired Mozart to even greater heights.

        Comment

        • verismissimo
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 2957

          #79
          Originally posted by Simon View Post
          How sad, on returning after some time, to note that the unpleasantness is still going strong. From the same people, of course supported later by the same members of the clique.
          I just don't see this. What am I missing?

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30302

            #80
            Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
            & the Exsultate Jubilate is a 'fun' piece.
            And he was 17 when he composed that (K165) [recte 16 - just before his 17th birthday]

            Emily Anderson's translation of a reference in one of Mozart's letters tries to catch the style of the original:

            "I for have the primo a uomo [Rauzzini] motet compose which to tomorrow at Church the Theatine perform be will."
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • David-G
              Full Member
              • Mar 2012
              • 1216

              #81
              Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
              ... From the start, with his father touring him round Europe, & continued by the Salzburg tourist board a Mozart myth has been built up that he is unique among composers.
              Mozart's uniqueness, if it exists, is to be found in his music. It has absolutely nothing to do with his father touring him around Europe, or with the Salzburg tourist board. Of course, all composers are unique. But having fallen under Mozart's spell, I would contend that perhaps he is indeed more unique than others.

              Comment

              • Arcades Project

                #82
                \
                Last edited by Guest; 30-07-13, 22:08.

                Comment

                • Dave2002
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 18021

                  #83
                  Originally posted by Arcades Project View Post
                  Persuading someone who is left cold by certain music - it depends; if they are keen to get some idea of what other people hear in the music, I think all you can do (with a nice circularity) is play them some of the music. Whether the below from YouTube would do the trick I don't know, but it's an excuse to share some (IMO) wonderful Mozart playing. I find it strange that someone could remain unmoved by this, but then there are people who have the oddest ideas about ... oh contemporary music or improv. I hope my fellow Mozart admirers enjoy this as much as I do: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nqtVQGWQBQ
                  Lovely, and Mozart's 27th piano concerto is one of many which I enjoy a lot. However, it struck me that the following qualities come out from this:

                  elegance
                  contrasting themes
                  calm development
                  relatively restrained dynamics
                  restrained key and harmonic variety
                  interchange between soloists and instrumental groups
                  steady tempo

                  It may be that a listener wants more or different things. Mozart can offer more, in different pieces, but generally will not provide extremes of loudness, extremes of tempo, wildness or some other qualities. Mozart can do chromaticism, and even 12 note music - the last movement of one of the symphonies uses all 12 notes - but generally his music does not wander tonally like Mahler, Strauss, Wagner, nor is it atonal, or aleatoric. A listener who wants those characteristics should listen elsewhere.

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30302

                    #84
                    Oh, dear - and I got up early to get on with some work :-) - but thank you for posting that.

                    [Referring to the Mozart PC vid.]
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • cloughie
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 22127

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                      It may be that a listener wants more or different things. Mozart can offer more, in different pieces, but generally will not provide extremes of loudness, extremes of tempo, wildness or some other qualities. Mozart can do chromaticism, and even 12 note music - the last movement of one of the symphonies uses all 12 notes - but generally his music does not wander tonally like Mahler, Strauss, Wagner, nor is it atonal, or aleatoric. A listener who wants those characteristics should listen elsewhere.
                      No but not many composers did in the late eighteenth century, I would argue that he was a key element in the evolution towards these things. Whilst his operas may not be seen as a blueprint for Salome or Elektra there is possibly a link through to Rosenkavalier.

                      Comment

                      • Dave2002
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 18021

                        #86
                        Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                        No but not many composers did in the late eighteenth century, I would argue that he was a key element in the evolution towards these things. Whilst his operas may not be seen as a blueprint for Salome or Elektra there is possibly a link through to Rosenkavalier.
                        I could have gone backwards in time, as well as looking forward from Mozart's. The characteristics of earlier music are different again - polyphonic choral music (smooth, mellifluous), dance rhythms in Renaissance and Medieval period music (vibrant, dynamic), etc..

                        One thing which I think has changed is the way words and music relate - or not. Some early music is really quite monotonous - with music presumably intended to accompany words - which themselves tell a story. Thus one might have a 5, 10 or even 20 verse song, with each verse being musically more or less identical to the last, but the words and the story are interesting. Sometimes they are like long shaggy dog stories, with a final denouement. I think we lose the appreciation of this, and often we don't understand the words anyway because of language issues. Listening traditions were different centuries ago - there were no films, TV etc. to watch.

                        Modern day pop music doesn't usually do this either, because it's so compressed - amongst other reasons.

                        In the 20th Century there were still some listening and performing traditions which have perhaps now largely vanished from our culture. How many people would go out in an evening to sing "On Ilkely moor baht'at"? nowadays?

                        Comment

                        • jean
                          Late member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 7100

                          #87
                          Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                          Some early music is really quite monotonous...
                          That's fighting talk!

                          Comment

                          • anamnesis

                            #88
                            Originally posted by waldhorn View Post
                            1) Requiem
                            2) Mass in C minor
                            3) Mass in C - 'Coronation Mass'
                            4) Idomeneo
                            5) Don Giovanni
                            6) All piano concertos from 1784 onwards
                            7) Symphonies 35-41
                            8) string quintet g-minor K 516

                            Comment

                            • cloughie
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2011
                              • 22127

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                              In the 20th Century there were still some listening and performing traditions which have perhaps now largely vanished from our culture. How many people would go out in an evening to sing "On Ilkely moor baht'at"? nowadays?
                              Maybe not that song but down here in Cornwall there's many a pub that has informal singing and probably it exists in England also.

                              Comment

                              • Arcades Project

                                #90
                                Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                                It may be that a listener wants more or different things.
                                Well yes. Except I don't see why it's so difficult to appreciate different music for its different characteristics. I don't expect Machaut to sound like Schütz or Schütz like Mozart or Mozart like Mahler or Mahler like Morton Feldman or Morton Feldman like Hans-Joachim Hespos - but whenever I listen to those composers I don't spend my time wishing (a) exhibited the musical characteristics of (b) etc. There's music I don't get on with, of course, but that's not because it doesn't sound like something else.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X