In the Wikipædia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_van_Dieren we find the startling suggestion that one composer - the Dutch secret-service man Bernard van Dieren - may have murdered another composer - the Englishman Philip Heseltine (who for some weird reason loved to call himself "Warlock"). In Grove's Dictionary Mr. Chisholm appears to refer obliquely to the matter when he writes "The . . . accusation of his [van Dieren's] having a baleful and indeed fatal effect on some of his friends is . . . unjustified."
How can Mr. Chisholm be so baldly certain that it is "unjustified"? It is more likely that he does not know, in which case he should say just that: that he has no evidence one way or the other. If he is certain that it is unjustified he should tell us why.
Can any one tell us more about the case? Cecil Gray doesn't appear to mention it.
How can Mr. Chisholm be so baldly certain that it is "unjustified"? It is more likely that he does not know, in which case he should say just that: that he has no evidence one way or the other. If he is certain that it is unjustified he should tell us why.
Can any one tell us more about the case? Cecil Gray doesn't appear to mention it.
Comment