I was going to head this 'I don't trust Christian Thielemann' which is sort of how I feel but that's a bit broad - of course I'm sure he is as diligent as they come and as honest as the day is long.
It's just that I don't 'get' (and have never 'got') what he does with tempi.
I was reminded of this today because (a) his name keeps coming up re: the BPO post-Rattle; and (b) I caught much of his performance of Schumann's 2nd with the Philharmonia this morning just after 11am on R3.
The latter struck me as being exactly how I don't like Schumann to go - interruptions of pulse for the insertion of pauses and tempo contrasts that seem to my ears to defy what the music is urging performers to do.
Perhaps he is more concerned with the sounds music makes, than with its progress - more 'Klang' than 'Schwung'
I'm afraid I don't like it.
Any views?
It's just that I don't 'get' (and have never 'got') what he does with tempi.
I was reminded of this today because (a) his name keeps coming up re: the BPO post-Rattle; and (b) I caught much of his performance of Schumann's 2nd with the Philharmonia this morning just after 11am on R3.
The latter struck me as being exactly how I don't like Schumann to go - interruptions of pulse for the insertion of pauses and tempo contrasts that seem to my ears to defy what the music is urging performers to do.
Perhaps he is more concerned with the sounds music makes, than with its progress - more 'Klang' than 'Schwung'
I'm afraid I don't like it.
Any views?
Comment