Classical music as 'protest music'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Wheels of Cheese

    #46
    I've directed people to this thread via my website. So be on your best behaviour people.

    Comment

    • heliocentric

      #47
      Originally posted by Wheels of Cheese View Post
      does the very existence of such music attack, let it be said, the whole smug edifice of contemporary capitalism. A bit? A little bit?
      In my opinion the most important thing contemporary composers have to offer the world is an example of how free the imagination and the intellect can be, as opposed to music which is constrained by tradition or genre or commercial considerations (note: extending and/or radicalising a tradition is not the same thing as being constrained by it). Unfortunately many contemporary composers behave as if what they do is hedged around by rules and regulations... but Pauline Oliveros obviously isn't one of those. So yes, in answer to your question, but it also depends on people hearing and understanding and questioning and using their own imaginations.

      Comment

      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
        Gone fishin'
        • Sep 2011
        • 30163

        #48
        Originally posted by heliocentric View Post
        In my opinion the most important thing contemporary composers have to offer the world is an example of how free the imagination and the intellect can be, as opposed to music which is constrained by tradition or genre or commercial considerations (note: extending and/or radicalising a tradition is not the same thing as being constrained by it).


        I would only add that the same distinctions can be made using "performers" instead of/as well as "composers" and that this doesn't just apply to Musicians from the "Classical" Music traditions.
        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

        Comment

        • heliocentric

          #49
          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
          I would only add that the same distinctions can be made using "performers" instead of/as well as "composers" and that this doesn't just apply to Musicians from the "Classical" Music traditions.
          Indeed so. By "composers" I had in mind creative musicians in general. The "imaginative freedom" idea is generally my answer to the common question of what relevance or function a music might have if it doesn't gather a large audience or make money, but it seemed to fit also with WoC's comment about Oliveros. What we call "contemporary music" for want of a more precise term is in a sense a tiny part of the musical landscape, but in another sense a keyhole through which a much larger landscape can be seen, it's a music which bears witness to infinite possibilities (or it has the potential to be) and in that sense at least can be radical in the way WoC describes.

          Comment

          Working...
          X