In Tune tonight had a piece called The Cake-walk by Debussy. Whaterver happened to those cheeky and delightful characters we used to collect out of Robertson's jam? I think it's possible to take PC stuff too far.
PC schedules
Collapse
X
-
Stunned by the initial post - a "golliwog" is a visual representation which exaggerates the physical characteristics of a specific ethnic group, for the supposed entertainment of people not a part of that group. Of course it's offensive, as The Black and White Minstrels were offensive.
I had a golliwog badge from Robertson when I was a child, I was very fond of it in complete ignorance of its meaning, it was like a teddy bear.
I enjoyed some of the songs on the B/W minstrel show but didn't have a clue at the age of 8 or 9 where the images came from or what they might imply.
Don't confuse "pc" with the suppression of offensive images. Can you watch Breakfast at Tiffany's without extreme discomfort at the characterisation of Mr. Yunioshi? I remember my shock at returning to the film after many years, hoping to enjoy the style, the story, the cat - especially the cat - again. The racist stereotype ruined it.
Yes, all these things are a part of cultural history, but that doesn't confer any lasting meaning or quality upon them - or if it does, that meaning can be turned upside down by experience. If an ethnic group now affectionately call themselves or each other "wogs" in creative revenge, that doesn't make it alright for an outsider to call them that. Words are powerful instruments of oppression, as well as self-definition.
Comment
-
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by Vile Consort View PostYes, it should be given its proper name, Le Petit Nègre. That's yer actual French!
As Dave 2002 has said, it's the title Debussy gave the piece. Do we have any right to change it? I don't suppose any editions of the music have been interfered with. We must accept that Debussy lived in a different age.
Comment
-
Don Petter
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostAs Dave 2002 has said, it's the title Debussy gave the piece. Do we have any right to change it? I don't suppose any editions of the music have been interfered with. We must accept that Debussy lived in a different age.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostIn Tune tonight had a piece called The Cake-walk by Debussy. Whaterver happened to those cheeky and delightful characters we used to collect out of Robertson's jam? I think it's possible to take PC stuff too far.
It's quite easy NOT to be offensive
you just don't say or write things that give offence
simple really
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostAgreed. But Debussy was not intending to give offence. Should we change the titles of his pieces?
conflating this with Stalinist censorship is IMV a misreading
for example , i'm quite interested in transgressive musics , I don't expect that this band (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8Xog...eature=related) would even get their name mentioned on the radio let alone any of their songs (yes , it is really dreadful stuff but part of the wide world of music )
Should we change all the Grape Lanes back ?
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostStunned by the initial post - a "golliwog" is a visual representation which exaggerates the physical characteristics of a specific ethnic group, for the supposed entertainment of people not a part of that group. Of course it's offensive, as The Black and White Minstrels were offensive.
I had a golliwog badge from Robertson when I was a child, I was very fond of it in complete ignorance of its meaning, it was like a teddy bear.
I enjoyed some of the songs on the B/W minstrel show but didn't have a clue at the age of 8 or 9 where the images came from or what they might imply.
Don't confuse "pc" with the suppression of offensive images. Can you watch Breakfast at Tiffany's without extreme discomfort at the characterisation of Mr. Yunioshi? I remember my shock at returning to the film after many years, hoping to enjoy the style, the story, the cat - especially the cat - again. The racist stereotype ruined it.
Yes, all these things are a part of cultural history, but that doesn't confer any lasting meaning or quality upon them - or if it does, that meaning can be turned upside down by experience. If an ethnic group now affectionately call themselves or each other "wogs" in creative revenge, that doesn't make it alright for an outsider to call them that. Words are powerful instruments of oppression, as well as self-definition.
The Mickey Rooney performance is a real cringe-maker
Comment
-
Osborn
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostWhaterver happened to those cheeky and delightful characters we used to collect out of Robertson's jam? I think it's possible to take PC stuff too far.
Comment
-
I was not intending to give offence. I just find that revising texts may change "history" as we know it. At the time Debussy's piece was written possibly not everyone was aware of all the connotations, though the fact that the title includes the term "cakewalk" may suggest that some at least had more awareness. Blanking out history does not seem to me an altogether respectable way to do things, and there have been many situations where history and "facts" have been rewritten later. It is said that this is usually by the victors.
Comment
-
Comment