Through the looking Glass
Collapse
X
-
Just read that review.
Well, as you say, she's not afraid to say it how she sees it.
I hope the criticism was valid.I don't like the "Knock it and make yourself a name" school of criticism.
No doubt, the views are well founded, though.
Don't get Glass at all, as it goes.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
-
-
Roehre
Originally posted by Boilk View PostOne young critic not afraid to put Philip Glass in his place
Receiving its UK premiere 10 years after it was written, Philip Glass's Sixth Symphony was overlong, belligerent and devoid of new ideas, writes Kate Molleson
Why aren't more critics unafraid to expose mediocre composers for what they are? Unbelievably, the Guardian has closed comments on this review less than 48 hours after it appeared.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostBecause it's usually used by people who have the mistaken belief that music (and art) they don't like is some kind of con trick.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Roehre View PostOf course
But why do YOU think that, S_A?
But to answer your appendment, Roehr, I think there's a certain break-off between people who were brought up on the idea of an historical evolutionary continuum, such as me (well, self-brought up with an occasional bit of guidance, now aged 66), and those who can take on board many contradictions and evaluate them according to perceived intrinsic worth as not necessarily rooted in precedent, or even within idiom, but maybe validated by factors external to "purely musical" desiderata?
I find myself very much caught between these two these days, having maybe been helped by a twin love of jazz in all manifestations stylistic and historical, and classical music ditto.
Comment
-
Comment