The contrary motion scale

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20570

    The contrary motion scale

    Ever since my piano teacher first intriduced me to the contrary motion scale, I have been puzzled by its frequent used by baroque and classical composers. Why? Because it appears to break so many of the other incredibly strict rules of harmony of the time, with a chord sequence of :
    I - VIIb - VIc - V7d - V7 - VI - Vb - I
    or the the other way round.

    However you look at it, this would have caused me to receive a metaphorical rap on the knuckles from my harmony teachers...
  • Serial_Apologist
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 37710

    #2
    Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
    Ever since my piano teacher first intriduced me to the contrary motion scale, I have been puzzled by its frequent used by baroque and classical composers. Why? Because it appears to break so many of the other incredibly strict rules of harmony of the time, with a chord sequence of :
    I - VIIb - VIc - V7d - V7 - VI - Vb - I
    or the the other way round.

    However you look at it, this would have caused me to receive a metaphorical rap on the knuckles from my harmony teachers...
    How about Schoenberg's 1st Chamber Symphony, in which even Beethoven's and Bach's comparative observance of harmonic norms of the time by "tweaking" the inverted order of tones and semitones so as to make them "euphonious" was abandoned in favour of "correct" orderings by using the resulting "dissonances" as passing notes (actual or potential)?

    The resulting "clashes" were certainly subvertive of "listener expectations" as well as theoretical niceties, but they paved the way for atonality, and the completely "new" ways of listening neccessitated by Schoenberg's opening up of music to new expressive realms.

    Many people still to this day can't manage to take these advances on board, more than 100 years after Schoenberg's composition; imv they are missing out!

    S-A

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20570

      #3
      My point was that this scale seemed to flout the there conventions of the time, and I've yet to see evidence on anyone raising an eyebrow.

      Comment

      • rauschwerk
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 1481

        #4
        I can't call any examples to mind, but surely in practice the scale would never be played slowly enough for there to be a different chord on each note?

        Comment

        • Pabmusic
          Full Member
          • May 2011
          • 5537

          #5
          Originally posted by rauschwerk View Post
          I can't call any examples to mind, but surely in practice the scale would never be played slowly enough for there to be a different chord on each note?
          This is what I was thinking. Any scales (in contrary motion or not) in 'older' music tend to be reasonably fast, and so wouldn't ever be harmonised note-by-note. Instead, the potentially problematic notes would become passing notes between strong harmonic ones*, giving rise to no concerns.

          *Or appoggiaturas on strong notes.

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            #6
            Originally posted by rauschwerk View Post
            I can't call any examples to mind, but surely in practice the scale would never be played slowly enough for there to be a different chord on each note?
            You've never heard me practising, rauschy*!

            Don't the conventions of voice-leading over-ride those of four-part harmony in this case, Alpie?







            (* = Lucky you! )
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37710

              #7
              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              You've never heard me practising, rauschy*!

              Don't the conventions of voice-leading over-ride those of four-part harmony in this case, Alpie?







              (* = Lucky you! )
              *Do* these conventions still apply? I'd imagined the went out with Stanford. To what do they apply?

              Comment

              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                Gone fishin'
                • Sep 2011
                • 30163

                #8
                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                *Do* these conventions still apply? I'd imagined the went out with Stanford. To what do they apply?
                Alpie's OP referred to the "incredibly strict rules of harmony of the time" (and, in #3, the "conventions" of the Baroque). My "get out of jail free card" with these "rules" (which Bach joyfully diregarded) is that "Voice -Leading" as far as JSB is concerned, is more important (especially in a two-part texture) than conventions of Chord progression in 4-part harmony.
                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                Comment

                • Serial_Apologist
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 37710

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                  Alpie's OP referred to the "incredibly strict rules of harmony of the time" (and, in #3, the "conventions" of the Baroque). My "get out of jail free card" with these "rules" (which Bach joyfully diregarded) is that "Voice -Leading" as far as JSB is concerned, is more important (especially in a two-part texture) than conventions of Chord progression in 4-part harmony.
                  Fair enough. I was "thrown" by Alpie's referring to *his* harmony teacher...

                  Comment

                  • Bryn
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 24688

                    #10
                    Somebody had to do it.

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • Eine Alpensinfonie
                        Host
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 20570

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                        Fair enough. I was "thrown" by Alpie's referring to *his* harmony teacher...
                        My, she was strict. We nicknamed her "Annie" after Annie Warburton.

                        Comment

                        • teamsaint
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 25210

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                          My, she was strict. We nicknamed her "Annie" after Annie Warburton.
                          I seem to recall having to play Bb major CM, and that it was an absolute pig to play !!

                          or is my memory going.....................
                          I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                          I am not a number, I am a free man.

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20570

                            #14
                            Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                            I seem to recall having to play Bb major CM, and that it was an absolute pig to play !!

                            or is my memory going.....................
                            Try E flat minor next.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X