Originally posted by MrGongGong
View Post
Applause
Collapse
X
-
Applause between movements seems to still be a bit of an open question.
Since it does sometimes happen at the proms, perhaps instead of the partial, start/stop kind of muted applause between movements, there could be an experiment at certain specified proms to actively encourage whatever response the audience feel like giving, and see how it pans out.
I am against applauding the paid artists before they have so much as played a note. Let them earn their applause , I say !!I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostIt isn't tradition. It's evolution, based upon experience. Over time, people have come to an understanding that the audience should let the music speak without interruption until it has ended.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostOh no it's not. is simply a mater of fashion. You find it fashionable to sit on your hands, others find it fashionable to show approbation by slapping theirs together
Insofar as either is 'fashionable' at the moment, it is what predominantly occurs which is: no applause. There may be the beginnings of a change but at the moment it isn't clear whether we shall revert to the previous 'fashion' (applaud when you like) or stay with the current one.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Panjandrum
Originally posted by Bryn View PostOh no it's not. is simply a mater of fashion. You find it fashionable to sit on your hands, others find it fashionable to show approbation by slapping theirs together while the orchestra retunes and throats are cleared throughout the performance venue.
How about this contemporary account of the reception of Lucrezia Borgia from 1860: "Not a note of Donizetti's delicious music was lost on him. There he sat, high above his neighbours, smiling, and nodding his great head enjoyingly from time to time. When the people near him applauded the close of an air (as an English audience in such circumstances always WILL applaud), without the least consideration for the orchestral movement which immediately followed it, he looked round at them with an expression of compassionate remonstrance, and held up one hand with a gesture of polite entreaty."
Comment
-
No lack of logic in my comment, frenchie. It's simply a matter of opposing fashions. Some find it fashionable to ape the behaviour of 18th century audiences, others find it fashionable to emulate a school detention session until the bell rings. As it happens, I tend towards the latter, but have been known to cough and splutter between movements. Frankly, I find my concentration on the music performed during separate movements is no more disrupted by applause between them than it is by retuning or a barrage of coughing and fidgeting. In fact, I find it less so. There again, I don't go to concerts to sneer at those who fail to follow any prevailing fashion. I go for the music.
Where do you get the idea that two or more competing fashions cannot exist at the same time?
Comment
-
-
If you want to have your music presented as a solemn religious ritual then there are places you can go for this ! (Late night in St Pauls hall for example !) but to try and insist on this for ALL music , particularly at a festival like the Proms, is ridiculous.
Some people become electroacoustic composers because they are dis-satisfied with the inaccuracies in live performances of their music and some give up going to concerts all together as they find being with other people intolerable so spend their money on a pair of Grado headphones instead
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostMmmm..really?
How about this contemporary account of the reception of Lucrezia Borgia from 1860: "Not a note of Donizetti's delicious music was lost on him. There he sat, high above his neighbours, smiling, and nodding his great head enjoyingly from time to time. When the people near him applauded the close of an air (as an English audience in such circumstances always WILL applaud), without the least consideration for the orchestral movement which immediately followed it, he looked round at them with an expression of compassionate remonstrance, and held up one hand with a gesture of polite entreaty."
Less flippantly, I intensely dislike applause during movements in music of the European classical tradition. That does interfere with the music and ones ability to hear, let alone concentrate on, it. Where, in opera performances, the orchestra continues attacca following a vocal stint, I really do dislike the long established fashion among opera audiences to drown the orchestra in clapped out applause, and it's by no means merely an English phenomenon. Applause between separate movements, as against those which follow on attacca, is a quite different matter.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostFashion is bullying by a commercial interest, or a focus group. Applause in the middle of a work is just inconsiderate.
Discuss.
where , when , which music ?
Applause is as much part of musicking as the sounds made by those on a stage.
I'm surprised that you regard the spaces between movements as part of the music that shouldn't be interrupted
but glad that you have recognised Cage's genius and let me know if you want to borrow my copy of this rather excellent work
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostFashion is bullying by a commercial interest, or a focus group. Applause in the middle of a work is just inconsiderate.
Discuss.
Comment
-
-
I was once severely frowned at by a member of the audience when I joined in the inter-movement applause during a string quartet concert. Being the composer of the piece they were playing I found it more than a little amusing when I was beckoned on stage at the end (my applause was for the performers not myself !). To lay down some hidden rule (or even an overt rule) at concerts misses out part of the reason for people gathering together in one place to listen ! I guess there's not much applause at choral evensong BUT that's not what the context demands......... performances of Mozart are another thing entirely
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostWhere do you get the idea that two or more competing fashions cannot exist at the same time?
If either could be termed a 'fashion' it would be 'clap between movements if you feel moved to do so'. Whether it will replace the long-standing tradition of not applauding until (a few seconds after) the end is something we cannot know.
But I repeat that Tom Service's attitude is a nonsense and does nothing for new concert-goers who require guidance. It is for the ultra knowledgeable: "I know this is simply the end of the movement but I feel moved to applaud and shall do so; I also know that this is the end of the work but the applause should not begin until I have recovered from this wonderful experience enough to feel I can now applaud." Tom - that's as egotistical as you can get!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment