Originally posted by smittims
View Post
International Women's Day
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostOf course I accept that it's difficult if not impossible, and unwise to try, to apply labels like 'masterpiece', as it always raises the question of where one draws the line and what qualifications one has for doing so.
When I questioned the assertion that 'we can't fill the schedules with masterpieces' I took it to mean that it's necessary for Radio 3 to play a range of classical music which includes much music which frankly isn't 'top drawer' but which is interesting in its way, which sheds light on musical life in history or provides light relief between the heavy stuff: otherwise we'd be playing just Bach and Haydn to Schubert all day long and we'd tire of it; so there has to be room for , say, Jack Moeran's 'Overture for a Masque' or Percy Grainger's 'Harvest Hymn' which aren't masterpieces but provide necessary variety. We can't fill the schedules with masterpieces any more than we can eat only fillet steak and fresh strawberries.
But when I asked 'why can't we?' I was thinking it would be a good experiment to have a week or so when only unquestioned masterpieces were broadcast. I think a lot of people would learn something.
Still, there are many outstanding pieces from 20th/21st Century to draw upon, from such as - Gubaidulina, Bacewicz, Ustvolskaya, Saariaho, Unsuk Chin, Tabakova, Eliane Radigue....(how often do even these names feature on this forum?)
You could fill days with those, but at least some of them are more often broadcast or recorded now (if in the more recent examples still not often enough). As for IWD, it has come to seem a little redundant in some contexts; but I suspect the composer choice on the day itself will try to include the (even) less often played....the quality less easily judged....
*****
Fiction and Poetry don't seem to need the IWD promotion; filmmakers and directors certainly do!
But childcare and equal pay can't be shouted about loud enough, or often enough!Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 08-03-23, 20:46.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostNow that Radio 3 is recognising women composers throughout the year, rather than just giving them a token day once a year, IWD on Radio 3 is less important than it was. That said, I’ve always found this to be a most interesting day, as we hear much that few of us know, rather than the daily playlist of stuff we’ve heard countless times before.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostBut who, which authority, decides on the (un)question? Vigorous debate would quickly (probably angrily) ensue.....
Still, there are many outstanding pieces from 20th/21st Century to draw upon, from such as - Gubaidulina, Bacewicz, Ustvolskaya, Saariaho, Unsuk Chin, Tabakova, Eliane Radigue....(how often do even these names feature on this forum?)
You could fill days with those, but at least some of them are more often broadcast or recorded now (if in the more recent examples still not often enough). As for IWD, it has come to seem a little redundant; I suspect the composer choice on the day itself will try to include the (even) less often played....the quality less easily judged....
*****
Fiction and Poetry don't seem to need the IWD promotion; filmmakers and directors certainly do!
But childcare and equal pay can't be shouted about loud enough, or often enough!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boilk View PostAm I missing something? Of course, her gender and ethnicity mean she ticks two boxes, so it's two-for-the-price-of-one in terms of BBC inclusivity.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostWhat you may be missing is the issue that women composers, and composers of colour, and those who fall in both those categories have been historically neglected. To suggest that anyone at the BBC is 'ticking boxes' I find offensive. Not to mention that there is something called 'BBC inclusivity' - as though it were alien to the rest of us.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostI think we need an all - gender international filmmakers and directors day to be honest .
Trans and non-binary writers/directors remain largely marginalised arthouse (if you're even that lucky), main exception the Wachowskis, whose mega-hit Matrix franchise predates their (separate) transitioning...
Why on Earth would ALL men need inclusion in such a day?
Zan-Zindagi-Azadi
WOMAN
LIFE
FREEDOMLast edited by jayne lee wilson; 08-03-23, 20:33.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostHow many women have been nominated for best director in Oscars history? 7. How many winners? 3. JUST 3 — Kathryn Bigelow for “The Hurt Locker” (2009), Chloé Zhao for “Nomadland” (2020) and Jane Campion for “The Power of the Dog” (2021)....
Trans and non-binary writers/directors remain largely marginalised arthouse (if you're even that lucky), main exception the Wachowskis, whose mega-hit Matrix franchise predates their (separate) transitioning...
Why on Earth would ALL men need inclusion in such a day?
WOMEN
LIFE
FREEDOM
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostWhat you may be missing is the issue that women composers, and composers of colour, and those who fall in both those categories have been historically neglected. To suggest that anyone at the BBC is 'ticking boxes' I find offensive. Not to mention that there is something called 'BBC inclusivity' - as though it were alien to the rest of us.
Do you really think they are doing this without more than half an eye on the inclusivity ratings they can give in their annual reports?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostTo think that that is NOT part of the exercise is, in my view, incredibly naive.
Do you really think they are doing this without more than half an eye on the inclusivity ratings they can give in their annual reports?
Surely "they" - producers and programmers - might, might just, care about such causes...?
Zan-Zindagi-Azadi
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostTo think that that is NOT part of the exercise is, in my view, incredibly naive.
Do you really think they are doing this without more than half an eye on the inclusivity ratings they can give in their annual reports?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostBut isn't that incredibly (and sweepingly) cynical?
Surely "they" - producers and programmers - might, might just, care about such causes...?
Zan-Zindagi-Azadi
And I'm not even sure that producers and programmers will have that much leeway anyway.
There will be diktats from on high, surely.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostTo think that that is NOT part of the exercise is, in my view, incredibly naive.
Do you really think they are doing this without more than half an eye on the inclusivity ratings they can give in their annual reports?
I thought the post itself ticked two boxes: (possibly unconscious) racism and (possibly unconscious) misogyny.
Comment
-
Comment