Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
Iván Fischer at 70
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostYou may have done well to get the Abravanel. The lp version of that recording was intentionally mixed for AM Radio capabilities. It sounded much better as a CD
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostIt cant be that difficult to distinguish between Ivan and Adam!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostYes, my original copy was on a Philips mid-price label, IIRC. More recently I have bought a CD release and downloaded high-resolution remasters. Seymour Solomon had an interesting approach to recording production. I have, of course, added that Berstein recording and his later ones, since, along with innumerable other recorded performances. It can be good to go back to recordings which introduced one to works, especially those which made a major initial impact.
The Utah Concertmaster was Joseph Silverstein, longtime Boston SO concertmaster and a player with a discography of his own. His granddaughter went to school with me in Michigan. One day J.S. Came to our classroom-I was probably about 10- and played a few short pieces. I could have cared less at the time. A few years later I became interested in music and eventually realized what a special event that had been. His granddaughter and I went to the same University and whenever I ran into her I would always ask how her Grandfather Joe was.
I think I’ve told that story on the Forum previously. I turn 65 in a few weeks, and you know how old geezers prattle on
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostMaurice Abravanel deserves remembering as a pioneer of several composers including Vaughan Williams, recording three of his works on Vanguard at a time when they were neglected, including 'Dona Nobis Pacem' , its first and for some years only available recording.
Comment
-
-
Returning to Iván Fischer, if we may, I'm now listening to his Mahler 9. The trouble with this work is that I get so involved in the composition that it's difficult to concentrate on what I might think about the performance. But the sighing horns at the end of the first movement are really special.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostReturning to Iván Fischer, if we may, I'm now listening to his Mahler 9. The trouble with this work is that I get so involved in the composition that it's difficult to concentrate on what I might think about the performance. But the sighing horns at the end of the first movement are really special.
In fact I have the complete Haydn symphonies, having at the time imagined - without checking! - that I was getting a recording by the Austro-Hungarian Haydn Orchestra (pure laziness, or rushing, I believe); I haven't yet heard Ivan's Mahler.
And I recently acquired Adam's Beethoven Cycle with the Danish Chamber Orchestrs.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View Postwhich Fischer are you referring to, Richard.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostI'm referring to Iván, here and elsewhere. A postscript to my previous post: when the final movement began I thought to myself oh no, this is far too fast, but by the end it had me thinking that the glacial pace of some renditions of this movement is more self-indulgence than bleak expressiveness. Fischer (I) is showing us the void, without having to underline it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View Post... the second movement takes on a much stronger aspect of foreboding than I've come across before... perceiving a shadow of twentieth century atrocities.Last edited by kernelbogey; 09-12-22, 17:55.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostI feel that myself about the fifth symphony - but it has to be our own projection, and nothing to do with the composer at the time of composition.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostThis has been raised before on this Forum... though not in relation to the Seventh, AFAIK. I don't see how to avoid this, given the European history of the last 100 years. I feel that myself about the fifth symphony - but it has to be our own projection, and nothing to do with the composer at the time of composition.Last edited by richardfinegold; 10-12-22, 02:16. Reason: After seeing the typos in kernelbogey’s repost
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostI've tried to read a lot about the origins of WWI, and to do that one really has to delve into European, and to a lesser extent Asian, African and American History of the last half of the 20th Century. I think it's fair to say that by the end of the 19th Century most of the World knew that something dreadful was going to occur around the horizon. While a Composer such as Mahler could not have predicted some thing as specific as, for example, the Battle of the Somme, they knew that the various sources of stress in the world were going to burst the relative peace that Europe enjoyed. However Mahler was undoubtedly influenced by his personal tragedies as well. Is his music (and others of the general period, such as the Brahms Fourth, or the Tchaikovsky Sixth) inicative of purely personal psychological crisis, spwcific to the individual creator? Or is there a more general anxiety for the fate of mankind as a whole mixed in?Originally posted by RichardB View PostThat [personal projection] doesn't make it any less real of course, but I think there's more to it than that - the sense of foreboding isn't uncommon in art and thought between 1900 and 1914, whether it's Mahler or Schoenberg or the beginnings of Expressionism - a perception that the current world order was about to collapse, even if it might not have been completely clear that something like the First World War was only a few years away.Last edited by kernelbogey; 10-12-22, 08:28.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostI'm not a Jungian - and Carl Jung said, I believe, 'Thank God I'm not a Jungian!'. But what you allude to here, I think Richard B and Richard F, is close to what he called 'The Collective Unconscious'. I'm not best placed to describe this, but one might say, I think in line with Jung's idea, that a widespread concsiousness that something dreadful was going to occur, however that might be individually experienced might become manifest in music, music theatre and visual arts. In Mahler's symphonies that's pretty clear - in #2 Der Mensch liegt in tiefster Not - and the first movement, in particular of #5, expresses, for me, profound existential angst.
I think I agree with your assessments, kb. Whereas the first movement of the Sixth, with its Grotesque Marche, seems to usher in a specifically military catastrophe, 5/1 is a more generalized angst.
Regarding Jung, it’s been a while for me there. However—do we need to postulate the existence of a “collective unconscious “ as opposed to a very collective consciousness? For these Armageddon scenarios were openly discussed.
There was a dichotomy between those who on the one hand argued that Nations were to bound up with economic interdependence to fight a ruinous war (and these people also believed that Civilization had advanced to a stage that recognized the futility and evil of War); and on the other the other side those that thirsted to smash things up using whatever
argument was convenient as a pretext-Nationalism and Economics (Capitalism vs Socialism ) being the 2 most commonly used idealogies. So there was angst about who would prevail, and as the Political Crises, the Pogroms and other persecutions were matched by Anarchist Violence which gave rise to more Militarism and Persecution. Female Emancipation , Colonialism, andRacism added to a toxic brew. From our vantage point it was a Golden Era;
Not so much to the contemporaries. And as we know, the Smashers prevailed. There had to be a collective feeling of helplessness in the face of all this, and that is what I tend to think of when I listen to much of what was created during this time
Comment
-
Comment