Iván Fischer at 70. Without knowing a great deal about Fischer I admire his music making - notably with his Budapest Festival Orchestra. I have to admit to confusing what he has done with his brother Adam - whose complete Beethoven Symphonies I own.
Iván Fischer at 70
Collapse
X
-
It cant be that difficult to distinguish between Ivan and Adam!
It was Adam who recorded the Haydn symphonies; Ivan is chief conductor of the Budapest Festival Orchestra with many recordings (not Haydn, though) on Channel Classics and previously with Philips.
I wonder if anyone else caught the 'Hard Talk' programme on BBC several weeks ago in which Stephen Sackur interviewed Ivan. Probably gone from the i-player but might still be out there somewhere."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostIt cant be that difficult to distinguish between Ivan and Adam!
It was Adam who recorded the Haydn symphonies; Ivan is chief conductor of the Budapest Festival Orchestra with many recordings (not Haydn, though) on Channel Classics and previously with Philips.
I wonder if anyone else caught the 'Hard Talk' programme on BBC several weeks ago in which Stephen Sackur interviewed Ivan. Probably gone from the i-player but might still be out there somewhere.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostStill "available now": https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3ct1n74 via BBC Sounds, or, for the next 5 months, via https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...r-and-composer (with video) via the iPlayer."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Both of the brothers are worth following. Ivan is best known to me for his recordings with the Budapest Festival Orchestra. They are about 80 players, so a bit small for a major Orchestra. I have several Bartok recordings they did with Phillips, and the PC disc with Kocsis is my favorite in that repertoire. For the past few decades they have been recording, in multichannel SACD, on Channel Classics, primarily Mahler/Brahms/Beethoven, with some Russian music sprinkled in. I admit that I have bought many of these for primarily for the audiophile credentials, but there hasn’t been a bad Apple in the lot, except for an indifferent Brahms First.
As noted Adam gained fame with his complete Haydn, on modern instruments. It was cheap as dirt, but frankly many of the performances sound as if they rolled off an assembly line. His Mahler from Düsseldorf garnered a lot of critical praise, far outpacing critical evaluation of Ivan’s cycle, although after I listened to the Fifth and Seventh by streaming I cannot see what the fuss was. Still Adam radiates a lot of enthusiasm on the YT clips that I have seen, so perhaps there is some gold there that I haven’t mined
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostBoth of the brothers are worth following. Ivan is best known to me for his recordings with the Budapest Festival Orchestra. They are about 80 players, so a bit small for a major Orchestra. I have several Bartok recordings they did with Phillips, and the PC disc with Kocsis is my favorite in that repertoire. For the past few decades they have been recording, in multichannel SACD, on Channel Classics, primarily Mahler/Brahms/Beethoven, with some Russian music sprinkled in. I admit that I have bought many of these for primarily for the audiophile credentials, but there hasn’t been a bad Apple in the lot, except for an indifferent Brahms First.
As noted Adam gained fame with his complete Haydn, on modern instruments. It was cheap as dirt, but frankly many of the performances sound as if they rolled off an assembly line. His Mahler from Düsseldorf garnered a lot of critical praise, far outpacing critical evaluation of Ivan’s cycle, although after I listened to the Fifth and Seventh by streaming I cannot see what the fuss was. Still Adam radiates a lot of enthusiasm on the YT clips that I have seen, so perhaps there is some gold there that I haven’t mined
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostIván's Mahler cycle is now complete except for no.8, is that right?"The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostIt is. My understanding is that Ivan Fischer does not intend recording the 8th, assuming he's not changed his mind.
Comment
-
-
Further thoughts on Fischer's 7th: I was very taken with the recent Petrenko recording, which so to speak ticks all the boxes of what I desire from a recording of this work, but Fischer's ticks boxes I didn't know were there. By concentrating on precision and clarity, he invokes the emotional complexities of each movement to reveal something I hadn't suspected was there, even though this is a work I have always felt very closely involved in, and don't share the critical attitude towards it that many people seem to have. For example the second movement takes on a much stronger aspect of foreboding than I've come across before, not just looking back at morbid Romantic tropes like Heine's "Heimkehr" (a melancholic traveller observes a sentry going about his business in a tower, and ends with the line "I wish he'd shoot me dead") but somehow looking forward also and perceiving a shadow of twentieth century atrocities. Maybe I'm reading too much into it! - I generally tend not to go for overinterpretation of music, and these reflections come after listening rather than in the process, during which I suppose I was aware of something more disturbing than usual without being specific about what it might be. Still, I think this would be a performance to convince those for whom the 7th isn't on the same level as Mahler's other symphonies.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostFurther thoughts on Fischer's 7th: I was very taken with the recent Petrenko recording, which so to speak ticks all the boxes of what I desire from a recording of this work, but Fischer's ticks boxes I didn't know were there. By concentrating on precision and clarity, he invokes the emotional complexities of each movement to reveal something I hadn't suspected was there, even though this is a work I have always felt very closely involved in, and don't share the critical attitude towards it that many people seem to have. For example the second movement takes on a much stronger aspect of foreboding than I've come across before, not just looking back at morbid Romantic tropes like Heine's "Heimkehr" (a melancholic traveller observes a sentry going about his business in a tower, and ends with the line "I wish he'd shoot me dead") but somehow looking forward also and perceiving a shadow of twentieth century atrocities. Maybe I'm reading too much into it! - I generally tend not to go for overinterpretation of music, and these reflections come after listening rather than in the process, during which I suppose I was aware of something more disturbing than usual without being specific about what it might be. Still, I think this would be a performance to convince those for whom the 7th isn't on the same level as Mahler's other symphonies.
I loved the 7th as soon as I heard it, after buying the Solti LPs when I had only read about the work. I wasn't disappointed!
On the evocative level (which doesn't happen often with me, either, in the act of listening) I've usually associated the NightMusic 1 with nature; the 2nd movement reminds me of Simpson's comment on the Bruckner 6th scherzo "we are out in the night with Owls and Blown Leaves..." But there's some strange, at times tongue-in-cheek, dark humour in there too.
I recall a quote about the scherzo "it is a child's fear of the dark that Mahler so compassionately describes..." but I can't remember who wrote that.
The music is wonderfully suggestive in the poetical meaning of the word; there are many ways to play it. But the Symphony itself absolutely adds up into a cyclical unity for me - and very inspired one, melodically and on other levels...Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 08-12-22, 17:48.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostThat's a very interesting reflection, Richard....
I loved the 7th as soon as I heard it, after buying the Solti LPs when I had only read about the work. I wasn't disappointed!
On the evocative level (which doesn't happen often with me, either, in the act of listening) I've usually associated the NightMusic 1 with nature; the 2nd movement reminds me of Simpson's comment on the Bruckner 6th scherzo "we are out in the night with Owls and Blown Leaves..." But there's some strange, at times tongue-in-cheek, dark humour in there too.
I recall a quote about the scherzo "it is a child's fear of the dark that Mahler so compassionately describes..." but I can't remember who wrote that.
The music is wonderfully suggestive in the poetical meaning of the word; there are many ways to play it. But the Symphony itself absolutely adds up into a cyclical unity for me - and very inspired one, melodically and on other levels...
Comment
-
Comment