Originally posted by Suffolkcoastal
View Post
Music for the Coronation
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostThe saddest thing is that the Coronation is one of the occasions when more listeners and viewers from outside Britain , many of whoim may never come here, look in to see what we're up to. When they hear these composers' offerings will they sigh or laugh up their sleeves and say 'There, didn't we say it was 'The Land Without Music?'
A remark such as this could so easily have been forgotten, but like so many quotations, it has been amplified disproportionately.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
The whole cathedral choir feels greatly honoured that our sixth-form girl choristers have been asked to sing in the Coronation.
(Unfortunately three years too late for my daughter, though you will be able to hear her in something else from Ash Wednesday...)
Comment
-
-
A different take on the subject of coronation music.
As reports swirl on the big stars playing or snubbing the upcoming coronation, here’s a few numbers that would actually sum up king and country in 2023
Anyone got any info on this? Or is it all firmly the realm of the social/trash media - uninformed speculation and clickbait?
As reports swirl on the big stars playing or snubbing the upcoming coronation,
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostA different take on the subject of coronation music.
As reports swirl on the big stars playing or snubbing the upcoming coronation, here’s a few numbers that would actually sum up king and country in 2023
Anyone got any info on this? Or is it all firmly the realm of the social/trash media - uninformed speculation and clickbait?
I suppose it shouldn't be a surprise that our newspapers seem happy to churn out articles by rock journalists on music at the after-party, whilst completely ignoring the music and performers programmed for the actual coronation.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostA remark such as this could so easily have been forgotten, but like so many quotations, it has been amplified disproportionately.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cat View PostIt is in reference to the concert at Windsor on the day after the coronation. Apparently Adele and Harry Styles et al. have cited previous commitments as rendering them unable to make an appearance at what is probably short notice relative to how their big gigs are typically scheduled.
I suppose it shouldn't be a surprise that our newspapers seem happy to churn out articles by rock journalists on music at the after-party, whilst completely ignoring the music and performers programmed for the actual coronation.
Comment
-
-
I was disappointed to see that Guardian article. So often nowadays in the media 'music' means rock music, as if no other exists. I don't think the music they mention 'represents' Britain today any more than the many other kinds of music such as amateur choirs, folk groups, local amateur wind bands, or you and me sitting at home playing a CD of Haydn, etc. Nor do I think there's any reason why the Coronation should 'represent' Britain today; this idea seems to have emerged from somewhere without any justification.
The Coronation is surely supposed to be a visible ceremony of religious significance where the King takes his oath for life . Music isn't essential at all. I know there's along standing tradition of it but it's curious that there should be such a fuss about the choice of music this time; I don't think that's happened before. I think the King has been pushed into this absurd low-brow choice of composers because of this spurious idea about 'representing' Britain, and as an unsatisfactory compromise to try to find a middle ground; but I suspect it will please only the 'Proms-in-the Park' type of audience
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI was disappointed to see that Guardian article. So often nowadays in the media 'music' means rock music, as if no other exists. I don't think the music they mention 'represents' Britain today any more than the many other kinds of music such as amateur choirs, folk groups, local amateur wind bands, or you and me sitting at home playing a CD of Haydn, etc. Nor do I think there's any reason why the Coronation should 'represent' Britain today; this idea seems to have emerged from somewhere without any justification.
The Coronation is surely supposed to be a visible ceremony of religious significance where the King takes his oath for life . Music isn't essential at all. I know there's along standing tradition of it but it's curious that there should be such a fuss about the choice of music this time; I don't think that's happened before. I think the King has been pushed into this absurd low-brow choice of composers because of this spurious idea about 'representing' Britain, and as an unsatisfactory compromise to try to find a middle ground; but I suspect it will please only the 'Proms-in-the Park' type of audience
I couldn’t agree more with your comments concerning 'music for the coronation'.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post.
... come now, caliban - it was a knowing joke
."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI was disappointed to see that Guardian article. So often nowadays in the media 'music' means rock music, as if no other exists. I don't think the music they mention 'represents' Britain today any more than the many other kinds of music such as amateur choirs, folk groups, local amateur wind bands, or you and me sitting at home playing a CD of Haydn, etc. Nor do I think there's any reason why the Coronation should 'represent' Britain today; this idea seems to have emerged from somewhere without any justification.
The Coronation is surely supposed to be a visible ceremony of religious significance where the King takes his oath for life . Music isn't essential at all. I know there's along standing tradition of it but it's curious that there should be such a fuss about the choice of music this time; I don't think that's happened before. I think the King has been pushed into this absurd low-brow choice of composers because of this spurious idea about 'representing' Britain, and as an unsatisfactory compromise to try to find a middle ground; but I suspect it will please only the 'Proms-in-the Park' type of audience
Comment
-
Comment