Categorisation of Music

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ein Heldenleben
    Full Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 6770

    #76
    I suspect Homo sapiens has been categorising things ever since we arranged bones / stones in every increasing size of deadliness . I also suspect we are not the only species to categorise. Putting my library in alphabetical order wouldn’t work though , nor would ordering by category work. The key thing at this “life stage “ is that nobody puts them back in the wrong place under ANY circumstances whatsoever.

    Comment

    • cloughie
      Full Member
      • Dec 2011
      • 22118

      #77
      Originally posted by RichardB View Post
      But there doesn't need to be! (I always attribute that quotation to Ellington rather than Armstrong but maybe they both said it...)

      Cloughie, sorry I misunderstood you. I certainly agree that "genres" as we know them were invented for the convenience of people making money out of musicians' work, rather than for those musicians or their listeners.
      Fine - I always thought it was Previn not Armstrong or Elligton - maybe I got it bad - not good!

      Comment

      • RichardB
        Banned
        • Nov 2021
        • 2170

        #78
        Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
        ever since we arranged bones / stones in every increasing size of deadliness
        Did we? I'm not aware of any evidence of that.

        All I'm saying is that putting music into tidy categories, or trying to, seems to me a somewhat limiting way to look at things. Even if some people find it convenient. Is music about convenience?

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30262

          #79
          Originally posted by RichardB View Post
          Even if some people find it convenient. Is music about convenience?
          Finding a form of classification 'convenient' isn't the same as finding music convenient, is it? And isn't arranging your CDs in alphabetical order in some sense for your convenience?
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            #80
            Originally posted by RichardB View Post
            Did we? I'm not aware of any evidence of that.

            All I'm saying is that putting music into tidy categories, or trying to, seems to me a somewhat limiting way to look at things. Even if some people find it convenient. Is music about convenience?
            Well, there's Dave Smith's "Music for Public Convenience", which I heard and recorded in concert, some decades ago. Other works featured were by John White, Gavin Bryars and the then 14 years old Amanda Hurton, a student of John's.

            Comment

            • RichardB
              Banned
              • Nov 2021
              • 2170

              #81
              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              Finding a form of classification 'convenient' isn't the same as finding music convenient, is it? And isn't arranging your CDs in alphabetical order in some sense for your convenience?
              This is getting a bit silly. I think you must know what I'm trying to say.

              Comment

              • NatBalance
                Full Member
                • Oct 2015
                • 257

                #82
                Originally posted by RichardB View Post
                Of course, all music actually originated from what could be called folk music.
                Can't see that. I think classical music mainly originated from church music. I believe in the west the first classical music was Gregorian chant.

                Originally posted by RichardB View Post
                What might be more desirable, in terms of opening minds and imaginations, is not to define musical "genres" in the first place. Can anyone think of a reason why they're needed?
                Well it makes conversation a lot less long winded. Just imagine how complicated discussions would be if that policy was carried through to everything. Imagine if the animal kingdom was not categorised into all its miriad branches and types and whatnot. It helps in analysing and understanding, otherwise you can't see the wood for the trees. I don't see anything wrong with putting things in boxes, it's what you then do with those boxes that can sometimes cause problems, and as I've pointed out before there will always be exceptions and also blending of different boxes.

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  #83
                  Originally posted by NatBalance View Post
                  Can't see that. I think classical music mainly originated from church music. . . . .
                  Which, in turn, came from . . .

                  I find no evidence that music originated in the Christian, or any other, church. See Stephen Mithen's The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind, and Body, for instance.

                  Comment

                  • RichardB
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2021
                    • 2170

                    #84
                    Originally posted by NatBalance View Post
                    Can't see that. I think classical music mainly originated from church music. I believe in the west the first classical music was Gregorian chant.
                    I wasn't talking about "classical" music but about music more generally, which as Bryn points out has almost certainly been around longer than our species. Also, Gregorian chant itself developed out of Byzantine chant which developed out of pre-christian music in the Greek modal system, which existed at least by the time of Pythagoras in the 6th century BCE and no doubt derived from folk music...

                    Originally posted by NatBalance View Post
                    Imagine if the animal kingdom was not categorised into all its miriad branches and types and whatnot.
                    Music is not a science. I think it's too often thought of as being divided into boxes according to genre, and that it's worth exploring the idea of not thinking of it like that.
                    Last edited by RichardB; 30-12-21, 08:58.

                    Comment

                    • antongould
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 8782

                      #85
                      Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                      Of course anton should be congratulated - the voice of reason - the rest of us are mere hangers on!
                      Hardly the voice of reason …… but still enjoying the discussions hereabouts …..

                      Comment

                      • Ein Heldenleben
                        Full Member
                        • Apr 2014
                        • 6770

                        #86
                        Originally posted by NatBalance View Post
                        Can't see that. I think classical music mainly originated from church music. I believe in the west the first classical music was Gregorian chant.



                        Well it makes conversation a lot less long winded. Just imagine how complicated discussions would be if that policy was carried through to everything. Imagine if the animal kingdom was not categorised into all its miriad branches and types and whatnot. It helps in analysing and understanding, otherwise you can't see the wood for the trees. I don't see anything wrong with putting things in boxes, it's what you then do with those boxes that can sometimes cause problems, and as I've pointed out before there will always be exceptions and also blending of different boxes.
                        This is where categories fall apart. Although Gregorian chant might have been a key point in the “development” of western music I don’t regard it as “classical” music. It was certainly amongst the earliest notated music though (I think ) .

                        Bang on queue they are just playing Peace Piece by Bill Evans on R3. It’s a fairly simple improvisation around two chords with an unvarying bass pedal.It borrows from Satie’s Gymnopedie and Bill’s own improvisation on Some Other Time : a Broadway tune written by Leonard Bernstein for On The Town . Is it Classical ? Is it jazz ? It isn’t really either …

                        Comment

                        • cloughie
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2011
                          • 22118

                          #87
                          Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
                          This is where categories fall apart. Although Gregorian chant might have been a key point in the “development” of western music I don’t regard it as “classical” music. It was certainly amongst the earliest notated music though (I think ) .

                          Bang on queue they are just playing Peace Piece by Bill Evans on R3. It’s a fairly simple improvisation around two chords with an unvarying bass pedal.It borrows from Satie’s Gymnopedie and Bill’s own improvisation on Some Other Time : a Broadway tune written by Leonard Bernstein for On The Town . Is it Classical ? Is it jazz ? It isn’t really either …
                          Whatever you call it - really very good!

                          Comment

                          • Ein Heldenleben
                            Full Member
                            • Apr 2014
                            • 6770

                            #88
                            Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                            Whatever you call it - really very good!
                            Yes I love the way the improv drifts into Messiaen style birdsong at the end…..definitely hors de categorie…

                            Comment

                            • french frank
                              Administrator/Moderator
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 30262

                              #89
                              Originally posted by RichardB View Post
                              This is getting a bit silly. I think you must know what I'm trying to say.
                              I think so, as in "I think it's too often thought of as being divided into boxes according to genre, and that it's worth exploring the idea of not thinking of it like that."

                              I was simply trying to put a different view, but it does depend on what the individual finds rewarding.
                              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                              Comment

                              • Ein Heldenleben
                                Full Member
                                • Apr 2014
                                • 6770

                                #90
                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                I think so, as in "I think it's too often thought of as being divided into boxes according to genre, and that it's worth exploring the idea of not thinking of it like that."

                                I was simply trying to put a different view, but it does depend on what the individual finds rewarding.
                                I’m surprised no one has said that there are essentially two categories of human beings . Those that divide things into categories and those that don’t …

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X