For my first encounter with the 4th I went for Sanderling, since I thought it was likely to be at least well recorded.
I think it's a beautifully shaped and orchestrated piece, maybe more so than Sanderling gives it credit for; harmonically and texturally it often seems strangely related to Mahler sometimes (rather than Bruckner which I don't think it resembles at all). I found the slow movement the most memorable of the four. I'm not sure I would associate the finale with any image in particular although the way it winds down at the end rather than in a more traditional way is quite attractive. But the whole piece lets itself down a bit for me in its material being a bit dry and forgettable, which is a shame. Thanks for the recommendation though, Jayne, I think I'll be listening to the other symphonies before too long.
I think it's a beautifully shaped and orchestrated piece, maybe more so than Sanderling gives it credit for; harmonically and texturally it often seems strangely related to Mahler sometimes (rather than Bruckner which I don't think it resembles at all). I found the slow movement the most memorable of the four. I'm not sure I would associate the finale with any image in particular although the way it winds down at the end rather than in a more traditional way is quite attractive. But the whole piece lets itself down a bit for me in its material being a bit dry and forgettable, which is a shame. Thanks for the recommendation though, Jayne, I think I'll be listening to the other symphonies before too long.
Comment